Quantcast

Do you think that atheists are immoral?

Assassin~ Badass Buzz Guru 2012/06/20 21:37:14
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Bastion 2012/06/25 13:44:29
  • ☥☽✪☾DAW ☽✪☾ 2012/06/22 23:01:09
    No
    ☥☽✪☾DAW ☽✪☾
    +1
    Ive met Athiests who are Far more Moral than some highly Religious Zealot Bible Thumpers
  • Aingean 2012/06/22 21:49:13
    No
    Aingean
    They believe differently then I do, I respect that that doesnt make them immoral or bad people.
  • art1ej 2012/06/22 07:21:32
    No
    art1ej
    LOL..most religions are immoral anyway...
  • S123 2012/06/22 03:51:15
    No
    S123
    Being an atheist is not immoral or moral. It's just a lack of belief.
  • Heptarch 2012/06/22 03:42:38
    No
    Heptarch
    +1
    Morality isn't dependent upon belief in a deity.
  • will 2012/06/22 00:56:20
    Yes
    will
    yes and no
    mostly depends on the person
  • NarcolepticGoat 2012/06/21 20:43:00
    No
    NarcolepticGoat
    People who do immoral things are immoral, no matter what they believe or don't.

    I happen to think atheists are wrong on one big issue, but plenty of atheists are good people.
  • Vision of Verve 2012/06/21 18:29:34
  • elijahin24 2012/06/21 17:08:28
    No
    elijahin24
    +1
    Not by virtue of being atheists, anyway. Some are, others are not. Same as Christians. I like to think I'm a pretty moral atheist.
  • JacquelineZote 2012/06/21 15:51:08
    No
    JacquelineZote
    Whether a person is moral or immoral isn't based on their choice of belief. I know many immoral Christians, Hindus and Muslims. So no, just because they're atheists doesn't mean that they're immoral.
  • Maya Zauberman 2012/06/21 15:12:51
    No
    Maya Zauberman
    Why would they be considered immoral? There's no reason for that assumption.
  • toosweet 2012/06/21 15:12:19
    No
    toosweet
    +2
    Morals have nothing to do with religious belief/non-belief.
  • Fran-Halen 2012/06/21 15:03:46
    No
    Fran-Halen
    +2
    nope....some of the most moral people I know are atheists.
  • Piwan 2012/06/21 14:52:28
    No
    Piwan
    +1
    Morals are a HUMAN idea, doesn't matter if you are religious or not, it is just about doing what is right.
  • I know I am a bitch so what? 2012/06/21 14:07:40
    No
    I know I am a bitch so what?
    no one is "immoral"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
  • Assassi... I know ... 2012/06/21 15:05:40
    Assassin~ Badass Buzz Guru
    Not true. Ted Bundy was immoral. Pedophiles are immoral. Lots of people are immoral.
  • ☥☽✪☾DAW... Assassi... 2012/06/22 23:01:44
    ☥☽✪☾DAW ☽✪☾
    Bundy was a Psychopath
  • BOOGIE-WOOGIE-MUSIC-MAN-ROC... 2012/06/21 12:46:16
    No
    BOOGIE-WOOGIE-MUSIC-MAN-ROCK-N-R
    +1
    Good folks
  • Mr.Steve 2012/06/21 10:42:27
  • SamTheSlayer [Codename: Duc... 2012/06/21 08:30:13
    No
    SamTheSlayer [Codename: Duchess]
    +1
    A person's religious beliefs do not determine whether or not a person is moral.
    I'm agnostic and I have morals, they're just not based any religious code.
  • BlytheSpirit~bn0 2012/06/21 06:44:19 (edited)
    No
    BlytheSpirit~bn0
    +2
    Some of them probably are. Not really any that I know. I do, however, think that the Pope is immoral and a whole host of those televangelists.
  • Anonymousforobvious 2012/06/21 06:34:52
    No
    Anonymousforobvious
    +3
    No more so than a theist.
  • c.ruth93 2012/06/21 05:50:04
    No
    c.ruth93
    +2
    Doesn't matter what you really believe in. Even the most faithful God fearing men can live immoral lives. It just depends on who you really are and what YOU believe in.
  • Willie 2012/06/21 05:31:58
    No
    Willie
    +3
    All of the atheists I know are living decent, honest lives, and doing so because they think it's the right thing to do, not because they're living in fear of eternal damnation or displeasing some supernatural being.
  • dvd 2012/06/21 05:18:56
  • OhPuhleze 2012/06/21 03:45:28
    Yes
    OhPuhleze
    +2
    Atheism does not define morality so how could an atheist claim to be moral? They cannot define good and evil in a non-relativistic way so how can they say they are good or evil?

    Because there are no eternal punishments or rewards for evil or good behavior in life there is an implied survival of the fittest morality in atheism.

    Not saying all atheists are bad people here. I'm simply considering the dogmatic implications of atheism itself.
  • elijahin24 OhPuhleze 2012/06/21 17:28:53
    elijahin24
    +1
    Morality is a matter of philosophy, not religion. Of all of the religions in the history of the world, Judaism is the first that attached ethics, to faith. Yet all of the other cultures had laws and cultureal norms, which defined their morality.
    For example, fundamental Buddhism was not religious in nature at all. It was simply a philosophy, an ethical code for how to treat one-another, and the world around us. The Greek and Roman philosophers took similar approaches. Seneca the Younger, one of the great Roman philosophers, didn't believe in the gods at all. He believed in science, yet he spoke of respect for each-other. Socrates, perhaps the greatest philospher to ever wear the label, at the very least, doubted the existance of deities. Yet he spoke of forgivness, mercy, and respect.

    I find it sad, and inherently IMmoral that so many feel that the only reason to be moral, is fear of eternal punishment, or the greed for an eternal reward. One of the ways I discipline my kids, is to make them write an essay about why they were wrong to do what they did. I need them to show me that, when they say they're sorry; they're sorry for doing something they shouldn't, and not just that they're being punished. Pavlov proved that anything can be trained to have a negative reaction to a...



    Morality is a matter of philosophy, not religion. Of all of the religions in the history of the world, Judaism is the first that attached ethics, to faith. Yet all of the other cultures had laws and cultureal norms, which defined their morality.
    For example, fundamental Buddhism was not religious in nature at all. It was simply a philosophy, an ethical code for how to treat one-another, and the world around us. The Greek and Roman philosophers took similar approaches. Seneca the Younger, one of the great Roman philosophers, didn't believe in the gods at all. He believed in science, yet he spoke of respect for each-other. Socrates, perhaps the greatest philospher to ever wear the label, at the very least, doubted the existance of deities. Yet he spoke of forgivness, mercy, and respect.

    I find it sad, and inherently IMmoral that so many feel that the only reason to be moral, is fear of eternal punishment, or the greed for an eternal reward. One of the ways I discipline my kids, is to make them write an essay about why they were wrong to do what they did. I need them to show me that, when they say they're sorry; they're sorry for doing something they shouldn't, and not just that they're being punished. Pavlov proved that anything can be trained to have a negative reaction to an act, due to negative stimulus. That requires no higher thought. the same is true of the proverbial carrot.
    Humans have the gift of higher thinking, without which, morality is pointless. Yet, you believe that the only way to make people do the right thing, is the same Pavlovian reward/punishment system that an inbread dog could follow?
    It isn't true. Allow me to tell you why I practice morality.

    Humanity is beautiful, and worthy of joy, but none of us can find that joy on our own. Each of us must be responsible to the others, for treating each other with respect. Each of us must find something to love, and something to love us back. It is only in the relationships with our fellow human beings, that our lives find meaning. Let me live my life in a way that enriches the lives of others, and others will live their lives in ways that enrich mine. That is MY moral code.
    (more)
  • OhPuhleze elijahin24 2012/07/16 21:49:29
    OhPuhleze
    Morality is not simply a matter of philosophy which is defined as:

    1) love and pursuit of wisdom,
    2) Investigation of the nature, causes, or principles of reality, knowledge, or values, based on logical reasoning rather than empirical methods
    3) A system of thought based on or involving such inquiry
    4) The critical analysis of fundamental assumptions or beliefs
    5) The disciplines presented in university curriculums of science and the liberal arts, except medicine, law, and theology
    6) The discipline comprising logic, ethics, aesthetics, metaphysics, and epistemology
    7) A set of ideas or beliefs relating to a particular field or activity; an underlying theory
    8) A system of values by which one lives

    None of these fit the basic definition of morality which is:
    1) The quality of being in accord with standards of right or good conduct
    2) A system of ideas of right and wrong conduct
    3) Virtuous conduct
    4) A rule or lesson in moral conduct

    In general the study of belief systems is not morality, it is not good and evil.

    Notice how morality is closely aligned with virtuous conduct in other words GOOD versus EVIL. It seems that you're equating the study of systems of belief and behavior with good behavior itself in an attempt to neutralize the need to define good and evil.


    What's sad is that so ma...

    Morality is not simply a matter of philosophy which is defined as:

    1) love and pursuit of wisdom,
    2) Investigation of the nature, causes, or principles of reality, knowledge, or values, based on logical reasoning rather than empirical methods
    3) A system of thought based on or involving such inquiry
    4) The critical analysis of fundamental assumptions or beliefs
    5) The disciplines presented in university curriculums of science and the liberal arts, except medicine, law, and theology
    6) The discipline comprising logic, ethics, aesthetics, metaphysics, and epistemology
    7) A set of ideas or beliefs relating to a particular field or activity; an underlying theory
    8) A system of values by which one lives

    None of these fit the basic definition of morality which is:
    1) The quality of being in accord with standards of right or good conduct
    2) A system of ideas of right and wrong conduct
    3) Virtuous conduct
    4) A rule or lesson in moral conduct

    In general the study of belief systems is not morality, it is not good and evil.

    Notice how morality is closely aligned with virtuous conduct in other words GOOD versus EVIL. It seems that you're equating the study of systems of belief and behavior with good behavior itself in an attempt to neutralize the need to define good and evil.


    What's sad is that so many atheists can only visualize religion as a negative relationship between creator and created. They completely miss the positive relationship of man and his creator.

    Not everyone obeys the laws of the land because they fear going to prison. Many people prefer to be good citizens because they love good. The same applies to those who are religious.
    (more)
  • elijahin24 OhPuhleze 2012/07/16 23:54:47
    elijahin24
    Well, I actually recognize no relationship between a creator and anyone. I do recognize the relationship between believers and their imaginary creator. And I even see some good in that. If your religion inspires you to behave in a way that is good for the world around you, great. But that doesn't mean that those of us without those beliefs, are not moral.
    As for your last paragraph, the same is true of most atheists. And that does not require ANY religious beliefs.
  • OhPuhleze elijahin24 2013/04/05 21:07:32
    OhPuhleze
    What you recognize and what actually exists are two different things.

    You cannot define morality because you cannot define good or evil - at least in any non relativistic way because ultimately you reject the notion of a fixed supreme good.
  • elijahin24 OhPuhleze 2013/04/07 20:48:29
    elijahin24
    I don't need a "fixed supreme good" to know that it's bad to hurt someone. That doesn't require a god, it just requires that I not be a sociopath. I agree that SOME morality is relative. Sexual morality, for example is something that different people can have different ideas about; but surely we can all agree that it's bad for adults to rape children; as happens all the time in churches; in which people who not only believe in the "supreme good", but actually claim to speak on his behalf.
    Moral relativism, is not the same as immorality, or amorality; provided that at least the basics, such as integrity, murder, rape, slavery, sex-slavery, and robbery (most of which are condoned and even encouraged in your Bible) are still seen as immoral.
  • Phoenix 2012/06/21 03:35:40
    No
    Phoenix
    +4
    Morality has nothing to do with religion (or lack of), just ask a kiddy-fiddling priest!
    Empathy is the main factor in leading a moralistic life.
  • wtw 2012/06/21 03:17:23
    No
    wtw
    +1
    My atheist brother is very moral but to be moral as an atheist is stupid!
  • Starman 2012/06/21 03:11:36
    No
    Starman
    +4
    Morality is doing the right thing because you know it the right thing to do, not because you are afraid some magic man in the sky will punish you if you don't.
  • Julian 2012/06/21 02:51:52
    No
    Julian
    +1
    Atheists aren't by nature immoral but they are easier to manipulate into immorality than believers. There is a big psychological difference between believing in an afterlife and not. There is no way that an athiest and a believer feel the same about death. If you believe that you cease to exist when you die, you will do almost anything to stay alive, even immoral things. If you believe that you will have to face God and answer for your behavior when you die, you will be more likely to do the honorable thing even when faced with the threat of death.
  • SK-LIBERTY OVER EQUALITY 2012/06/21 02:45:02
    Yes
    SK-LIBERTY OVER EQUALITY
    +1
    But, for all have sinned and fallen short of the Glory of God. Rom. 3:23
  • tommyg - POTL- PWCM-JLA 2012/06/21 02:36:02
    No
    tommyg - POTL- PWCM-JLA
    +1
    Not at all.
  • Doreen 2012/06/21 02:33:33
    No
    Doreen
    +2
    I have yet to meet one that is even close to immoral and I know a lot of them.
  • NEVER FORGET, NEVER FORGIVE... 2012/06/21 02:17:21

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Fun

2013/06/18 21:32:13

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals