DO YOU THINK ITS OK, FOR A GUY TO BE A STRIPPER?
2789847
2012/04/08 22:09:11
|
|
|||||
|
318 votes
|
|
85% | |||
|
57 votes
|
|
15% | |||
Top Opinion
-
GutReactionJournal 2012/04/08 22:47:28SURE, GO FOR IT
+9Why not? Men like to drool over hot women's bodies, so why not guys like the Chippendales for the women? If there wasn't a paying audience there wouldn't be female OR male strippers.
Goes back to my cave
John: its not wat you think.
Ringo: gawdgeous stripper's body.
Paul:mehh.
After many, many hours, days and months of research, I think women are better at stripteases. Particularly those birds from the 70s.
come to mama!!!!!!!!
Oh, really? Precisely where did I deny that there /is/ a picture of two suggestive male models posing together attached to this question? Quote it for me if you would.
In the meantime, once again, the question, irregardless of the picture, is fantastically straight-forward in its lack of inquiry about the sexuality of prostitutes.
"You should answer the question as it's asked. The picture does not change the question."
"You should answer the question as it's asked. The picture does not change the question."
"In the meantime, once again, the question, irregardless of the picture, is fantastically straight-forward in its lack of inquiry about the sexuality of prostitutes."
Let's break that down for you, because confusion is convenient to your argument.
"In the meantime"
As in, while you're searching for that non-existent quote.
"once again"
As in, I'm about to reiterate what I've been saying all along.
"irregardless of the picture"
As in, what is to follow will be true whatever the picture may be.
"the question [...] is fantastically straight-forward in its lack of inquiry about the sexuality of prostitutes."
As in, this question, read as it is written, very clearly makes no allowance for believing that it is about anything other than the gender of the [stripper], including, but not limited to, the sexuality of the [stripper]. Which is precisely what this says:
"You should answer the question as it's asked. The picture does not change the question."
As in, this question, read as written, very clearly makes no allowance for believing that it is about anything other than the gender of the [stripper], including, but not limited to, a...
"You should answer the question as it's asked. The picture does not change the question."
"In the meantime, once again, the question, irregardless of the picture, is fantastically straight-forward in its lack of inquiry about the sexuality of prostitutes."
Let's break that down for you, because confusion is convenient to your argument.
"In the meantime"
As in, while you're searching for that non-existent quote.
"once again"
As in, I'm about to reiterate what I've been saying all along.
"irregardless of the picture"
As in, what is to follow will be true whatever the picture may be.
"the question [...] is fantastically straight-forward in its lack of inquiry about the sexuality of prostitutes."
As in, this question, read as it is written, very clearly makes no allowance for believing that it is about anything other than the gender of the [stripper], including, but not limited to, the sexuality of the [stripper]. Which is precisely what this says:
"You should answer the question as it's asked. The picture does not change the question."
As in, this question, read as written, very clearly makes no allowance for believing that it is about anything other than the gender of the [stripper], including, but not limited to, anything having to do with the picture (which you suppose to be about 'the sexuality of the [stripper].)
Hopefully that makes things a bit more clear, so that you can avoid lying in the future.
It asks "DO YOU THINK ITS OK, FOR A GUY TO BE A STRIPPER?" That will never, ever, ever, ever mean "do you think its ok for a guy to be a gay stripper?"
...NO tea-bagging.
Ladies need to watch something too!