Quantcast

Do you respect our President ?

2789847 2012/07/03 01:44:50
Related Topics: President
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/11/19 05:17:26
    gr8American
    So you are saying that the Constitution should be modified to suit the Conservative agenda? See that's where your Constitutionality stance loses all its merit.
    The Constitution is supposed to be respected regardless what your personal feelings are.
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/19 05:48:11
    judge
    Who is better suited to the right to life then the very young who haven't had the chance that you have been blessed with. How do you get the Constitution to say a woman's right to choose includes baby killing? Women can choose to abstain from sex or be sterilized, but once pregnant there is another individuals rights to deal with.
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/11/21 01:56:00
    gr8American
    I hope you start paying attention to the Constitution.
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/21 04:56:24
    judge
    What in the Constitution gives a woman the right to kill her baby?
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/11/21 12:55:26 (edited)
    gr8American
    +1
    LOL, no where in the constitution however there is something called freedom of choice, guess you only read the parts that make you feel good, like listening to a conservative controlled media program, fills you with glee but loses elections.
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/21 17:59:31
    judge
    +1
    What choice does the unborn woman have. I think I know what that would be, and support that womans (or mans) choice.
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/21 18:01:37
    judge
    +1
    The majority have a hard time finding the right way.
    narrow is the way to heaven and few find it
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/11/22 00:38:20
    gr8American
    +1
    So are you talking religious beliefs or the Law of the land? I will quote you again "I hope you start paying attention to the Constitution."
    Rowe v Wade is the law of the land, I stand by it same as our President,
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/22 04:58:59 (edited)
    judge
    Rights come from God! The first, second, and last sentences of the Declaration of Independennce confirm that our forefathers believed rights are from God. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men... are endowed by their Creator... unalienable Rights,... among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
    *Lysander Spooner wrote as follows:“Government is established for the protection of the weak against the strong. This is the principal,if not the sole motive for the establishment of all legitimate government. It is only the weaker party that loses their liberties, when a government becomes oppressive. The stronger party, in all governments are free by virtue of their superior strength. They never oppress themselves. Legislation is the work of the stronger party; and if, in addition to the sole power of legislation, they have the sole power of determining what legislation shall be enforced, they have all power in their hands, and the weaker party are the subjects of an absolute government. Unless the weaker party have veto, they have no power whatever in the government . . . no liberties . . . The trial by jury is the only institution that gives the weaker party any veto upon the power of the stronger. Consequently it is the only institution that gives ...














    Rights come from God! The first, second, and last sentences of the Declaration of Independennce confirm that our forefathers believed rights are from God. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men... are endowed by their Creator... unalienable Rights,... among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
    *Lysander Spooner wrote as follows:“Government is established for the protection of the weak against the strong. This is the principal,if not the sole motive for the establishment of all legitimate government. It is only the weaker party that loses their liberties, when a government becomes oppressive. The stronger party, in all governments are free by virtue of their superior strength. They never oppress themselves. Legislation is the work of the stronger party; and if, in addition to the sole power of legislation, they have the sole power of determining what legislation shall be enforced, they have all power in their hands, and the weaker party are the subjects of an absolute government. Unless the weaker party have veto, they have no power whatever in the government . . . no liberties . . . The trial by jury is the only institution that gives the weaker party any veto upon the power of the stronger. Consequently it is the only institution that gives them any effective voice in the government, or any guaranty against oppression.

    The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land.
    The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for a law which violates the Constitution to be valid. This is succinctly stated as follows:

    "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and
    void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)

    "When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there
    can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."
    Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.
    "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

    And since Obama is unqualified under the Conatitution, his election creates no office.

    an unconstitutional act creates no office
    (more)
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/11/22 14:47:30
    gr8American
    Again I quote you "I hope you start paying attention to the Constitution" The Declaration of Independence is not the law of the land.
    You can have your own beliefs but that will not change the Constitution written word, regardless how much Christian fundamentalists would want to,
    That is why the majority of the American People in search of their inelianable right for the pursuit of happines (not an American quote by the way) dismiss religious bibles or documents from their daily life.
    We don't care what happens when we die, trust me on this.
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/22 16:02:38 (edited)
    judge
    +1
    All legitimate government is established for the protection of the weak against the strong.
    I would seem you aren't too concerned about protecting the weak.
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/11/23 12:37:12
    gr8American
    +1
    I am sure you include those that are unemployed or that for some reason are on food stamps. Dems by default are inclusive of all human beings and actually animals too. Fetuses within the abortion range not included.
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/23 14:18:00
    judge
    +1
    So pregnancy for a Dem is seen as a sexually transmitted disease?
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/11/23 19:36:29
    gr8American
    +1
    No and I believe in freedom of choice, whatever happened to you Constitution Stance? Seem as you are now avoiding it like anything to do with Romney.
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/23 21:31:51
    judge
    +1
    Your right to swing a fist, ends at another's jaw.
    You have no right to choose to suck the brains out of another's skull.
    The Panamanian McCain beat Romney the dual citizen Mexican last time, and this time the Kenyan beat the dual citizen Mexican that couldn't beat the Panamanian last time.
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/11/24 00:10:23
    gr8American
    There goes the constitution, why do Conservatives always bring it up but never stand by it.
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/24 05:05:19
    judge
    I can't figure out what you are talking about. All criticism, no specifics.
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/11/24 14:58:43
    gr8American
    +1
    Your comment : "I hope you start paying attention to the Constitution." and the Rowe v Wade ruling, it gives women the right to privacy and freedom of choice in the Constitution, is that specific enough? How do you feel about the Constitution now?
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/24 18:50:13
    judge
    No, you mean to say we have the right to choose to kill someone in private? I don't believe you understand the Constitution. It is about the freedom to do what is right, which involves responsibility and maturity.
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/11/24 21:04:12
    gr8American
    Ignoring what the Constitution states is not believing in it. I remind you that the Constitution is not the Bible that can be modified to whatever you want it to mean.
    It gives women the right to privacy and the Freedom of choice period.
    Do you believe it the Constitution now?
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/25 01:13:36 (edited)
    judge
    The Constitution is there to protect our God given rights. I don't see baby killing as one of those rights, rather it protects the right to life (Declaration of Independance). A woman can abstain from sex or be sterilized to prevent it, but once pregnant another individuals rights come into play. Perhaps you could include Article and Section of the Constitution to support your view for legal baby killing.
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/11/25 03:59:25 (edited)
    gr8American
    Well that settles it then you will use the Constitution the same as the bible. Which means that you will interpret at your discretion and modify to suit your needs, I suggest you stay within the conservative controlled media world cause they the only ones that feel that they posses such freedom and magical power, the rest of America respects and stand with the Constitution of the United States of America.
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/25 04:02:12
    judge
    +1
    Perhaps you could include Article and Section of the Constitution to support your view for legal baby killing.
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/11/25 16:17:19
    gr8American
    If you were truly "Constitutional" you'd go about amending the Constitution the legal way instead of demeaning women and all those that disagree with your beliefs.
    If you have a view on baby killing which is illegal in this Country you should state it, but don't go mixing your religious beliefs with the Constitution, you can do what you want with the Bible, you will never have a right to your on facts with the Constitution so drop your phony self righteous stance for the Constitution because you continuously oppose its mandate.
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/25 16:37:35
    judge
    Perhaps you could include Article and Section of the Constitution to support your view for legal baby killing.
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/11/25 21:38:40
    gr8American
    No that would be a Conservative waste of time proposition, The Majority of the American People, who are truly Constitutional by the way, stand with the way it is.
    Next time you want to bring up Constitution remember that rowe v wade is part of it.
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/26 01:38:00
    judge
    Whereas the purported 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution was never lawfully adopted in accordance with the requirements of the United States Constitution because eleven states of the Union were deprived of their equal suffrage in the Senate in violation of Article V, when eleven southern states, including Louisiana, were excluded from deliberation and decision in the adoption of the Joint Resolution proposing said 14th Amendment; said Resolution was not presented to the President of the United States in order that the same should take effect, as required by Article I, Section 7; the proposed Amendment was not ratified by three fourths of the states, but to the contrary fifteen states of the then thirty seven states of the Union rejected the proposed 14th Amendment between the dates of its submission to the states by the Secretary of State on June 16, 1866, and March 24, 1868, thereby nullifying said Resolution and making it impossible for ratification by the constitutionally required three fourths of such states;

    The Court ruled 7-2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: pro...





    Whereas the purported 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution was never lawfully adopted in accordance with the requirements of the United States Constitution because eleven states of the Union were deprived of their equal suffrage in the Senate in violation of Article V, when eleven southern states, including Louisiana, were excluded from deliberation and decision in the adoption of the Joint Resolution proposing said 14th Amendment; said Resolution was not presented to the President of the United States in order that the same should take effect, as required by Article I, Section 7; the proposed Amendment was not ratified by three fourths of the states, but to the contrary fifteen states of the then thirty seven states of the Union rejected the proposed 14th Amendment between the dates of its submission to the states by the Secretary of State on June 16, 1866, and March 24, 1868, thereby nullifying said Resolution and making it impossible for ratification by the constitutionally required three fourths of such states;

    The Court ruled 7-2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women's health.

    Therefore we have an illegitimate statute, based on the 14th Amendment which was never ratified, giving women the illegitimate right from man wearing dresses, to murder their young. Since then the most dangerous place for anyone to be, with regard to the preservation of one's life, is in the womb of one's mother.
    Human sacrifice on the altar of nihilistic humanism continues.

    There was no constitutional convention with an ammendment to the Constitution giving a woman the rights you specify. Therefore it is not a part of the Constitution, merely an illegitimate statute, waiting to be overturned.
    abortion horror
    (more)
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/11/27 03:35:26
    gr8American
    ho-hum, give it up, if you don't believe the Constitution gives women freedom of choice, why are you people always trying to invent laws to kill it?
    This is it what it means, you people are only constitutional if it suits you but don't really care what it says.
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/11/27 03:37:51
    judge
    There was no constitutional convention with an ammendment to the Constitution giving a woman the rights you specify to kill babies. Therefore it is not a part of the Constitution, merely an illegitimate statute, waiting to be overturned.
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/12/01 16:41:08
    gr8American
    If you are true Constitutionalist, you will work by the law of the Constitution, till it is overturned, otherwise you are a conservative controlled media Constitutionalist, ie you don't really stand by the Constitution.
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/12/01 18:27:07
    judge
    The Constitution and statutes are two different things. If a statute is unconstitutional it can be overturned. If congress informs the court that life begins at conception, then the court will rule abortions are what they are, murder.
  • gr8Amer... judge 2012/12/01 21:18:38
    gr8American
    Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled 7-2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women's health. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the trimester of pregnancy.

    is the 14th Amendment part of the Constitution?
  • judge gr8Amer... 2012/12/02 01:23:51
    judge
    Therefore we have an illegitimate statute, based on the 14th Amendment which was never ratified, giving women the illegitimate right from man wearing dresses, to murder their young. Since then, the most dangerous place for anyone to be, with regard to the preservation of one's life, is in the womb of one's mother.
    Human sacrifice on the altar of nihilistic humanism continues.

    Scientists and common sense have determined when life begins (i.e. at conception)

    Similarly, in Roe v. Wade (and it progeny), the Supreme Court held that a woman has the right to an abortion so long as the fetus is not viable, (dead)!

    So what do the doctors do? They kill the baby inside the womb before delivery. partial birth abortion
    partial birth abortion
  • YourCompanionCube 2012/11/16 18:19:12
    Yes
    YourCompanionCube
    +1
    I respect the President and Truly hope that he will make amends. However, Hope is gone and I do not LIKE the President, Nor his policies, his sexist staff, His inability to take action towards terrorist attacks (Unless of course, the whole thing was a planned kidnapping that went wrong) and the fact that he's been able to use every Possible BETTER candidate in the Democratic party as a scapegoat. How many times has Hillary taken falls for Bill and Barack? Actually, I have little respect for him.
  • rand 2012/10/15 01:08:33
    Yes
    rand
    +2
    His efforts have been genuine; not that I voted for him.
  • GOP Poison 2012/10/15 00:54:40
    Yes
    GOP Poison
    +3
    After the way he has been treated by the right wing of this country from 3 toothed trailer trash to elected officials I wouldn't blame if he didn't run again.But I think that was their plan.Bullying people into thinking if you put him back in we will do our best to see that he does not get anything done. Oh well,you know the old saying"bullies are all cowards deep down".
  • Quazimoto 2012/09/28 14:53:14
    No
    Quazimoto
    +2
    How can anyone respect a pathological liar.
  • tom Savage Quazimoto 2012/11/16 22:08:19
    tom Savage
    +1
    And your credential for this diagnosis come from where?
  • Quazimoto tom Savage 2012/11/19 13:52:50
    Quazimoto
    Obama- If the Supreme Court throws out the federal health care law, it “would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.”

    Obama- “For the first time since 1990, American manufacturers are creating new jobs.”

    Obama- “Preventive care … saves money, for families, for businesses, for government, for everybody.”

    Obama- “Thirty million Americans, including a lot of people in Florida, are going to be able to get healthcare next year because of that law.”
    Truth-O-Meter rating: False

    Obama- “I made a bunch of these promises during the campaign. … We’ve got about 60 percent done in three years.”

    Obama Admin.- Under President Barack Obama, the United States has “doubled our exports.”


    Obama Admin.- The president’s proposed budget “will help reduce the deficit by $400 billion over the next decade to the lowest level since Dwight Eisenhower was president.”
    Truth-O-Meter rating: False

    Obama- Under the White House’s budget proposal, “we will not be adding more to the national debt” by the middle of the decade.

    Obama- Twelve judges have thrown out legal challenges to the health care law because they rejected “the notion that the health care law was unconstitutional.”

    Obama- “I didn’t raise taxes once.”

    Oba...















    Obama- If the Supreme Court throws out the federal health care law, it “would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.”

    Obama- “For the first time since 1990, American manufacturers are creating new jobs.”

    Obama- “Preventive care … saves money, for families, for businesses, for government, for everybody.”

    Obama- “Thirty million Americans, including a lot of people in Florida, are going to be able to get healthcare next year because of that law.”
    Truth-O-Meter rating: False

    Obama- “I made a bunch of these promises during the campaign. … We’ve got about 60 percent done in three years.”

    Obama Admin.- Under President Barack Obama, the United States has “doubled our exports.”


    Obama Admin.- The president’s proposed budget “will help reduce the deficit by $400 billion over the next decade to the lowest level since Dwight Eisenhower was president.”
    Truth-O-Meter rating: False

    Obama- Under the White House’s budget proposal, “we will not be adding more to the national debt” by the middle of the decade.

    Obama- Twelve judges have thrown out legal challenges to the health care law because they rejected “the notion that the health care law was unconstitutional.”

    Obama- “I didn’t raise taxes once.”

    Obama- When President Franklin D. Roosevelt started Social Security, “it only affected widows and orphans,” and when Medicare began, “it was a small program.”

    Obama- The Bush administration had been “giving (auto companies) billions of dollars and just asking nothing in return.”

    Obama- “The vast majority of the money I got was from small donors all across the country.”

    Obama- “We’ve excluded lobbyists from policymaking jobs.”

    Obama- When Obama was interviewed by American reporters in Asia, “Not one of them asked me about Asia. Not one of them asked me about the economy.”

    Obama- Insurers delayed an Illinois man’s treatment, “and he died because of it.”

    Obama- Health reform will “give every American the same opportunity” to buy health insurance the way members of Congress do.

    Obama- Preventive care “saves money.”

    Obama- (No earmarks in spending bill)
    (more)
  • tom Savage Quazimoto 2012/11/21 17:29:41
    tom Savage
    +1
    "Pathological"? Your credential please.

    I will get back to your itemized claims but for now I must play golf.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Fun

2013/05/26 03:11:19

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals