Do You Consider Yourself an 'Internet Troll'?

I'm more of a feeder, I enjoy watching trolls try to troll me lol, so no one gets hurt lol, except for everyone who has to see the eyesore we cause lol

I'm not a master troll yet, though. I have so much more to learn.

Can't think of a bigger waste of life and energy. Some people need to get out more and learn to interact with humans in the real world..

fact is, the real world isn't as fun

True

I give my opinion and defend it if necessary but the PC croud will usually call me stupid or a troll. Geez, they are more intolerant and rude than they claim we are.

i wouldnt say im "smarter than that" but i dont usually... i only pick on those little teenie boppers who call themselves 'beliebers'...but they deserve it....

WAY smarter.

if I don't like something I will stay away from it but if someone ask for my opinion I will give it to them no matter it they like it or not

No, but I'm currently being TROLLED by two SH members.

Wow, that was a mind-numbing read...

Not a troll. While I do enjoy hurting strangers, I do it in person, so I can see the pain on their faces.

Please come try to hurt me. I've got something for you. Child.

I am no child. And of course, you're in america, I'm in england, and I don't know if you're a viable target. I use words, specific words for each person.

No excuses, punk. I got news. Come and find out that YOU'RE the target.

And, at 18 yoa, you ARE a child.

Err... no. Legal age of adulthood is 18, therefore in every significant way, I'm an adult. Your perceptions of maturity, and the like have no relevence on the matter.
I offered no excuses, merely clarrifications and observations.
If you really want to assault a stranger feel free to come here, however I have no passport and lack the available funds to acquire one so I can't visit you. Not a mere excuse, an observation of fact.
The crime of course, would be assault, not assault of a minor, or whatever we call it over here. I watch too much CSI.

And of course, I'm not a punk, whichever definition you go by; the social movement in the late 1970s, the US term for tinder, or the offensive term to describe someone who’s worthless or lazy.
Obviously not the second, wood rarely knows how to type, and the first and the last; I understand why you’d use the term. You too like to insult random people, but please show a shred of common decency and use insults that are applicable.

Legal, schmeagal. You are pedantic, prolix and juvenile. Most likely due to the INGSOC UK education propaganda camp. Screw the definitions, you ARE a punk. Stay out of prison, bunk muffin.

So you’re dismissing the accepted facts because they don’t agree with you, and inaccurately insulting my country and myself rather than attempting to discuss the topic at hand. Ad hominem, refusal to stay on topic, well now, I think you match this question quite well; you possess the traits one looks for in an internet troll.
But credit where it’s due, you’ve accurately identified my pedantic nature, and I guess to someone like you I’d appear prolix, but for an English guy I’m practically laconic. I guess that’s what I get for using (mostly) full sentences and relatively accurate grammar. I don’t see why that’s a bad thing, I believe it to be better than how trolls such as yourself speak.

Oh, and if you’re going to insult my country, do that accurately too. We’ve got plenty of flaws, our fascination with the monarchy, our tendency to let the Anglican religion influence government policy, and remember that time we subjugated a quarter of the world’s land, and over eighty per cent of its total surface?

Blah blah blah. you said you like to hurt people. I say you're a punk. A blithering, gasbag little product of socialist indoctrination. A waste of bandwidth and oxygen. OWN it.

Own what? Your ambiguity isn’t helpful.
Yes, I like to hurt people; I’m a sadist and a sociopath, what’s your excuse? But neither I nor my country are socialist, our people aren’t indoctrinated (not how the British public don’t agree on anything, especially politics) and bandwidth isn’t exactly wasted. No point between us two is being used at maximum capacity, I’m not wasting anything, merely utilising that which would otherwise go unused.
But back to the point, you say “you said you like to hurt people. I say you're a punk.”
That is correct; I say I like to hurt people (emotionally, psychologically etc.) because I know it as a verified fact. You make the supposition that I’m a punk, and proceed to state it as fact. As it is, the only fact in your previous comment was your indirect quote of me, and you’re continuing to display the characteristics of the traditional internet troll. (To reiterate, that’s the fabrication of not-facts, for use in ad hominem, your refusal to stay on topic, instead attacking me, and the use of meaningless statements like “OWN it.” Utilising completely unnecessary capitalization of letters that really should be lower case.)

Gawd, you're a windbag. Get back to us when (if) you ever actually have something to say. Are you a clinically dignosed narcissist?:

It appears that Willski takes this one.

Thank you.

Only a pinhead would think that.

He's succeeded in pissing you off while you haven't done the same. Therefore he wins.

qq moar

Who's pissed off?

Apparently you. :/

Apparently not.

Apparently so as you took the time to assert that you're not.

Silly child. No imagination. But what does one expect from a post-modern adolescent?

How does that make me have no imagination? That's like saying Justin Bieber has talent. If you're going to insult me, you can at least be more creative than saying "post-modern."

lrn2postmodern n qq moar

... you seem very childish, i hope you responded that you are a troll.

Nobody asked you. ANOTHER child heard from.

LOL childish response "NO ONE ASKED YOU", guess what this is public, it's not my problem if you don't keep your little quarrels private.

Get a diaper change and a nap.