Do you believe in God?
Tudie BN
2012/06/29 18:25:58
|
|
|||||
|
100 votes
|
|
50% | ||
|
34 votes
|
|
17% | ||
|
30 votes
|
|
15% | ||
|
11 votes
|
|
5% | ||
|
27 votes
|
|
13% | ||
Welcome friends to Tudies Questions' Please leave a reply' :)
Top Opinion
-
Pixie·MzAwesome♠ƤĦĂĔŢ♠ 2012/06/29 18:29:09
Also Jesus was created long before man.
The Cambridge Dictionary defines it as, "the basic level of practical knowledge and judgment that we all need to help us live in a reasonable and safe way".
Sorry I'm not the best at explaining it. I know their are others who can much better than I.
Atheism is mindless.
I think it would be wise to show respect for all belief systems, including the lack thereof. Just because you don't agree, doesn't mean you need to insult others.
You also need to check your facts. Most scientists are not Atheists and most of the greatest scientists have been Theists.
I think Atheism is mindless. It's also proven horrifically dangerous when taken seriously to it's logical conclusions - no moral truth, no intrinsic significance or value to human life, no ultimate accountability.
,Atheists Stalin, Mao, Lenin, Pol Pot, Kim Jung, Castro et al have shown us the horrific moral insanity of Atheism taken seriously - over 100 MILLION Dead and half the planet enslaved under brutal tyranny in this past century alone. I have very good reason for my low opinion of Atheism, .
Here is a very cursory outline of some of the best evidences for God. The full arguments and evidences are not NOT adequately explained here. This is a very compacted outline I put together - not comprehensive.
Contingency – Why does something exist rather than nothing? Something cannot begin from nothing without a cause, so Something must self-exist. Self-existence is necessary. Self –creation is impossible. The Universe began. Universe is not self-existent. Universe requires a causally antecedent agency to explain it’s ex...
You also need to check your facts. Most scientists are not Atheists and most of the greatest scientists have been Theists.
I think Atheism is mindless. It's also proven horrifically dangerous when taken seriously to it's logical conclusions - no moral truth, no intrinsic significance or value to human life, no ultimate accountability.
,Atheists Stalin, Mao, Lenin, Pol Pot, Kim Jung, Castro et al have shown us the horrific moral insanity of Atheism taken seriously - over 100 MILLION Dead and half the planet enslaved under brutal tyranny in this past century alone. I have very good reason for my low opinion of Atheism, .
Here is a very cursory outline of some of the best evidences for God. The full arguments and evidences are not NOT adequately explained here. This is a very compacted outline I put together - not comprehensive.
Contingency – Why does something exist rather than nothing? Something cannot begin from nothing without a cause, so Something must self-exist. Self-existence is necessary. Self –creation is impossible. The Universe began. Universe is not self-existent. Universe requires a causally antecedent agency to explain it’s existence. God does not – no beginning.
Cosmological – Absolute beginning requires a cause. Cause of Physical Universe cannot be Physical. Must be non-physical, space-less, timeless and willful to cause Physical Universe from Physical Nothingness.
Design: Specified ordered and integrated interdependencies aimed towards a third-purpose design objectives clearly infer intelligent agency. ‘Chance’ events within limited time-frames cannot rationally account for Design achievements No plausible Naturalistic mechanisms or explanations actually exist. Origin of radically sophisticated DNA information (software) driving molecular highly sophisticated molecular machines within each cell. Also, the design inference from irreducible complexity cannot and certainly has not been adequately explained.
Precision FINELY TUNED constants and quantities present in initial conditions of the Universe to within infinitesimally narrow ranges to permit life. Universe is precision balanced on razor’s edge. This is virtual mathematical proof of intent – a function of mind – is necessary to explain these precision orderings.
Ontological argument – God is a metaphysically necessary Being. Since God’s attributes are metaphysically possible, and all metaphysical possibilities must also be actual if possible, God must be actual.
Intelligence in Nature: Intelligence, order and reason and information all from Nothingness?
Spiritual instinct of man: Evolved to connect with something not actual?
Free-will: Chemical causation is not free-will. Agency requires a soul. Chemicals have no moral duties.
Moral Truth / Apprehension of Objective moral truth. Is rape really wrong or just an illusion? Is rape just a natural chemical byproduct caused by electrochemical activity (Atheism) – or an act of will.
Massive Historical evidences of witnessed Miracles, visions, fulfilled prophecies,.
Personal experiences: Ubiquitous NDE’s, supernatural phenomena
Christ’s resurrection witnessed by hundreds.
Absolute failure of Naturalism to explain a Finely tuned Universe, Finite Universe, Sentience, Rational truth and natural order, Moral Law (morality), intuition, intentionality, intelligence, purpose, free-will…
The fact that Atheists must shirk any intellectual burden to justify belief. They define Atheism as a "lack of belief" (a description of a psychological state - neither true nor false) rather than an intellectual belief POSITION is evidence that Atheism is mindless.
The fact that Atheists try to hide Atheism behind definitions that are indistinguishable from Agnosticism is evidence Atheists cannot justify their beliefs on the merits.
How many times must your protests fail?
Where is your evidence to justify Atheism?
Defeat my many evidences for Theism - including the impossibility of free-will that we all experience from electro-chemical causation.
Do you Atheists ever take intellectual responsibility when proven wrong? No, you don't.
I have fully justified my belief in God - and justified my belief that Atheism is mindless.
That is not a basis for logical debate, or the sign of an even adequate scholastic intellect.
What proof and evidence do you have that "atheism is mindless" is accurate and correct?
See, we can all play that stupid little game :-)
(Fact) You have utterly failed to provide any evidence to justify Atheist belief.
Facts Matter ...Unfortunately, you lost that 'stupid little game'.
The irony is that Atheists define Atheism is terms of a mindless psychological state of 'lacking a belief' hoping to hide their actual belief from any burden to justify.
Rocks and tree stumps lack a belief. Humans hold belief positions.
Why would I 'open my mind' to accepting a belief position that is indefensible in reason and evacuates all moral truth, intrinsic values and significance from life? I may as well 'open my mind' to becoming a heroin addict. Some ideas are just stupid.