Do you believe in god?
Elizabeth
2012/06/24 04:39:22
|
|
|||||
|
42 votes
|
|
69% | ||
|
19 votes
|
|
31% | ||
If you do you more and likely probably go to church.
Top Opinion
-
666_Maggots~PassionForGlory... 2012/06/24 05:02:17
Blessings to all and,
May all be well with you ^_^
If I have to have faith or believe in something, I believe in myself.
I don't need religion or a God to be happy in life.
I don't call myself Atheist, etc.
And I'm not the kind of person to comment on anyone's religion in a negative way.
Beliefs are beliefs. If you believe in God, it's perfectly alright with me. [:
There is no evidence or good reason to believe God doesn't exist
(Fact) God is not located "in the sky". God does not exist in space. Space-time and material exist as a contingency, Science has proven that (Big Bang).
You are repeating nonsense you have been misled to believe by Atheists.
(fact) Your argument is one big genetic fallacy.
Where is your evidence or arguments that the chance of God existing is very low?
(fact) There is massive evidence for God. There is zero evidence for no God - or Unicorns.
(fact) Over 100 MILLION have been slaughtered by Atheists in this past century alone - dwarfing all religions combined over thousands of years.
Stop allowing the Atheists to deceive you.
Nonsense. God cannot exist within something that depends on God for it's own existence. That's logically impossible.
The Big Bang is highly confirmed science. An absolute beginning to this physical Universe has been fully confirmed. Red Shift, BGV Theorem, background radiation, relativity, etc
Now let's debate. Show me your evidence for no God.
Here is a very cursory outline of some of the best evidences for God. The full arguments and evidences are not NOT adequately explained here. This is a very compacted outline I put together - not comprehensive.
Contingency – Why does something exist rather than nothing? Something cannot begin from nothing without a cause, so Something must self-exist. Self-existence is necessary. Self –creation is impossible. The Universe began. Universe is not self-existent. Universe requires a causally antecedent agency to explain it’s existence. God does not – no beginning.
Cosmological – Absolute beginning requires a cause. Cause of Physical Universe cannot be Physical. Must be non-physical, space-less, timeless and willful to cause Physical Universe from Physical Nothingness.
Design: Specified ordered and integrated interdependencies aimed towards a thir...
Nonsense. God cannot exist within something that depends on God for it's own existence. That's logically impossible.
The Big Bang is highly confirmed science. An absolute beginning to this physical Universe has been fully confirmed. Red Shift, BGV Theorem, background radiation, relativity, etc
Now let's debate. Show me your evidence for no God.
Here is a very cursory outline of some of the best evidences for God. The full arguments and evidences are not NOT adequately explained here. This is a very compacted outline I put together - not comprehensive.
Contingency – Why does something exist rather than nothing? Something cannot begin from nothing without a cause, so Something must self-exist. Self-existence is necessary. Self –creation is impossible. The Universe began. Universe is not self-existent. Universe requires a causally antecedent agency to explain it’s existence. God does not – no beginning.
Cosmological – Absolute beginning requires a cause. Cause of Physical Universe cannot be Physical. Must be non-physical, space-less, timeless and willful to cause Physical Universe from Physical Nothingness.
Design: Specified ordered and integrated interdependencies aimed towards a third-purpose design objectives clearly infer intelligent agency. ‘Chance’ events within limited time-frames cannot rationally account for Design achievements No plausible Naturalistic mechanisms or explanations actually exist. Origin of radically sophisticated DNA information (software) driving molecular highly sophisticated molecular machines within each cell. Also, the design inference from irreducible complexity cannot and certainly has not been adequately explained.
Precision FINELY TUNED constants and quantities present in initial conditions of the Universe to within infinitesimally narrow ranges to permit life. Universe is precision balanced on razor’s edge. This is virtual mathematical proof of intent – a function of mind – is necessary to explain these precision orderings.
Ontological argument – God is a metaphysically necessary Being. Since God’s attributes are metaphysically possible, and all metaphysical possibilities must also be actual if possible, God must be actual.
Intelligence in Nature: Intelligence, order and reason and information all from Nothingness?
Spiritual instinct of man: Evolved to connect with something not actual?
Free-will: Chemical causation is not free-will. Agency requires a soul. Chemicals have no moral duties.
Moral Truth / Apprehension of Objective moral truth. Is rape really wrong or just an illusion? Is rape just a natural chemical byproduct caused by electrochemical activity (Atheism) – or an act of will.
Massive Historical evidences of witnessed Miracles, visions, fulfilled prophecies,.
Personal experiences: Ubiquitous NDE’s, supernatural phenomena
Christ’s resurrection witnessed by hundreds.
Absolute failure of Naturalism to explain a Finely tuned Universe, Finite Universe, Sentience, Rational truth and natural order, Moral Law (morality), intuition, intentionality, intelligence, purpose, free-will…
(fact) You have no objective basis for moral truth unless God exists. You can't provide any. Under Atheism, what makes your moral delusions any more valid than a child rapist's - when there is no moral truth?
(fact) You have not engaged any arguments or evidence I have provided you. You simply pretend they don't exist.
Better get busy kid.
.
No you don't. If so, then what is IT!! Tell us exactly what objective moral principle exists under Atheism that makes a child rapists moral opinion any less valid than yours? Under Atheism, exactly what objective basis do you have to claim child rape is morally wrong - if the child rapist thinks child rape is good for him? You have none.
P1) Objective moral truth cannot exist unless God exists
P2) Objective moral truth exists
Conclusion: God exists
There you go, now which premise will you deny?
You have ignored my evidence - you have not even engaged it. You will lose badly on the merits if you try.
You haven't presented a shred of evidence to justify your Atheist belief that No God exists.. If you disagree, then give me an example.
You are totally confused and inconsistent. First, you denied Big Bang when I whacked you on what Big Bang confirms. Now you claim it is fully proven - but have no point beyond that.
You don't have an answer at all. You also have not provided any objective basis for any moral reality. You just offered Naturalist speculations that answer nothing and begged the question.
Getting angry at me doesn't answer the question.