Quantcast

Did God make homosexuals in God's own image?

bob 2012/05/03 18:22:41
Related Topics: God
God made homosexuals in God's own image
God is straight and did not homosexuals in God's own image
God made women in God's own image
God made space aliens in God's own image
God allows life to evolve into beautiful and fictional beings
What GOD or GODESS ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT
Undecided
All of the above
None of the above
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • TheMadChameleon 2012/05/03 19:27:27
    God made homosexuals in God's own image
    TheMadChameleon
    +5
    I always find the idea that God made everyone in "his" image, but has a set gender and presumably no sexuality, to be entertaining. That said, I don't think that whatever deity is out there really cares who a person is attracted to, or who they have sex with, so long as no one is harmed.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Drake 2012/07/03 03:57:08
  • kmay 2012/05/04 15:29:25
    None of the above
    kmay
    Having the “image” or “likeness” of God means, in the simplest terms, that we were made to resemble God. Adam did not resemble God in the sense of God’s having flesh and blood. Scripture says that “God is spirit” (John 4:24) and therefore exists without a body. However, Adam’s body did mirror the life of God insofar as it was created in perfect health and was not subject to death.

    The image of God refers to the immaterial part of man. It sets man apart from the animal world, fits him for the dominion God intended him to have over the earth (Genesis 1:28), and enables him to commune with his Maker. It is a likeness mentally, morally, and socially.

    Mentally, man was created as a rational, volitional agent. In other words, man can reason and man can choose. This is a reflection of God’s intellect and freedom. Anytime someone invents a machine, writes a book, paints a landscape, enjoys a symphony, calculates a sum, or names a pet, he or she is proclaiming the fact that we are made in God’s image.

    Part of being made in God’s image is that Adam had the capacity to make free choices. Although he was given a righteous nature, Adam made an evil choice to rebel against his Creator. In so doing, Adam marred the image of God within himself, and he passed that damaged likeness on to all...





    Having the “image” or “likeness” of God means, in the simplest terms, that we were made to resemble God. Adam did not resemble God in the sense of God’s having flesh and blood. Scripture says that “God is spirit” (John 4:24) and therefore exists without a body. However, Adam’s body did mirror the life of God insofar as it was created in perfect health and was not subject to death.

    The image of God refers to the immaterial part of man. It sets man apart from the animal world, fits him for the dominion God intended him to have over the earth (Genesis 1:28), and enables him to commune with his Maker. It is a likeness mentally, morally, and socially.

    Mentally, man was created as a rational, volitional agent. In other words, man can reason and man can choose. This is a reflection of God’s intellect and freedom. Anytime someone invents a machine, writes a book, paints a landscape, enjoys a symphony, calculates a sum, or names a pet, he or she is proclaiming the fact that we are made in God’s image.

    Part of being made in God’s image is that Adam had the capacity to make free choices. Although he was given a righteous nature, Adam made an evil choice to rebel against his Creator. In so doing, Adam marred the image of God within himself, and he passed that damaged likeness on to all his descendants (Romans 5:12). Today, we still bear the image of God (James 3:9), but we also bear the scars of sin. Mentally, morally, socially, and physically, we show the effects of sin.

    The good news is that when God redeems an individual, He begins to restore the original image of God, creating a “new self, created to be like God in true righteousness and holiness” (Ephesians 4:24). That redemption is only available by God’s grace through faith in Jesus Christ as our Savior from the sin that separates us from God (Ephesians 2:8-9). Through Christ, we are made new creations in the likeness of God (2 Corinthians 5:17).

    http://www.gotquestions.org/i...

    God does not condone behavior He condemns. He loves all of us and we are made in His image [as noted above]. However, due to the gift of free will, we choose our behavior.
    (more)
  • bob kmay 2012/05/04 15:44:59
    bob
    Ah more Abrahamic religions fairy tales. Our sun is in a sea of suns, many suns have planets with life on them. We are one of coutless trillions of plantes with advanced life on them. And they all evolved to more advanced life forms.
  • kmay bob 2012/05/04 16:01:26
    kmay
    Your opinion.
  • Mike 2012/05/04 15:01:09 (edited)
    None of the above
    Mike
    +1
    god has given each of us a fight in life to prove our worth to him. if we choose to ignore that fight. then what does that say about you as a human being. but if you don't believe in GOD lets look at it a different way. you are fighting against the laws of nature, sure you can procreate if you are homosexual. but then you have gone back to square one. you have lied to yourself about something you , yourself have claimed you are not!! either way , it is hard to ignore the facts that what has been done is either a sin against nature or a sin against GOD. that is a tough road to travel and I feel for all those that are on it
  • bob Mike 2012/05/04 15:45:47
    bob
    +1
    Ah more Abrahamic religions fairy tales. Our sun is in a sea of suns, many suns have planets with life on them. We are one of coutless trillions of plantes with advanced life on them. And they all evolved to more advanced life forms.
  • Mike bob 2012/05/04 15:58:26
    Mike
    but when you lie to yourself who are you fooling, if not yourself???
  • justnotsaying (: 2012/05/04 07:42:09
    None of the above
    justnotsaying (:
    +2
    They were created by their parents.
  • Shadow 2012/05/04 03:53:29
    None of the above
    Shadow
    +1
    I know that someone might lecture meabout this, but I don't believe in god. I just believe that we are what we are, and we should live our life to the fullest. In retaliation to peoplewho think god created homosexuals in his image: the Bible says that homosexuality is WRONG. thats one reason Im not religious.
  • Chokmah 2012/05/04 03:13:06
    What GOD or GODESS ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT
    Chokmah
    +2
    Homosexuality is counter intuitive. Nature wants species to reproduce and thrive. That being said, I don't think that anybody would consciously choose homosexuality unless there is some strong biological/psychological predisposition.
  • Batman 2012/05/04 02:58:44
    God made homosexuals in God's own image
    Batman
    +2
    made humans in his own image
  • Arel 2012/05/04 00:38:48
    God made homosexuals in God's own image
    Arel
    +3
    and free will.
  • Boris Badinov 2012/05/04 00:33:14
    God made homosexuals in God's own image
    Boris Badinov
    +2
    Yes, of course He did.
  • WannaBeRSC the Contrarian SOB 2012/05/04 00:22:36
    God is straight and did not homosexuals in God's own image
    WannaBeRSC the Contrarian SOB
    +1
    Nope, I think it's fairly "straight" forward, and perversion has no part of God.
  • S123 2012/05/04 00:20:11
    Undecided
    S123
    I don't know what god did, you should try asking him.
  • Cat 1017 2012/05/03 23:05:23
    Undecided
    Cat 1017
    +1
    Gods a spirit....sexuality is a non issue , in the spirit realm.....
  • geneticmistake 2012/05/03 22:56:53
    None of the above
    geneticmistake
    +1
    God didn't make diddly squat. Man made god.
  • SteveMarine- JLA 2012/05/03 22:27:09 (edited)
    None of the above
    SteveMarine- JLA
    +2
    All i can say is ... Butt sex is nasty... But last time I checked.. god made Adam...with a dick..and Eve with a vagina.... .. A pole to go in a hole....two poles dont make a right..... Or in other words .. two poles don't make a human race....two poles don't create life... Yep.
  • Seiryuu SteveMa... 2012/05/04 23:36:27
    Seiryuu
    I'd be worried if anyone had a urethra large enough to put a dick in.
  • Dave Sawyer ♥ Child of God ♥ 2012/05/03 22:15:29
    God made homosexuals in God's own image
    Dave Sawyer ♥ Child of God ♥
    +2
    They have the same shape.
  • sjalan 2012/05/03 21:42:49
    All of the above
    sjalan
    +1
    And if any of it is true then I'm in for a surprise.
  • Assassin~ Badass Buzz Guru 2012/05/03 21:28:02
    None of the above
    Assassin~ Badass Buzz Guru
    God is not sexual. And your picture looks like no gay person I have ever seen.
  • SteveMa... Assassi... 2012/05/03 22:31:40
    SteveMarine- JLA
    Yeah that pic is wild....
  • bob Assassi... 2012/05/04 15:48:43 (edited)
    bob
    I'm straight, I do a lot of ballroom and swing dance. I have friends who are gay. I'm tired of Christain Gay bashing. The pic came up and was just wild so I selected it
  • mind-pilot 2012/05/03 20:56:48
    God is straight and did not homosexuals in God's own image
    mind-pilot
    Here's the problem with the basic nature of God and that is to multiply and inhabit the earth. The homosexual cannot reproduce. It's kind of a dead issue if you want homosexuals trying to reproduce. It don't happen.Besides, I think the statement is "In Gods likeness", not "image". That's two different things.
  • William... mind-pilot 2012/05/03 22:09:22
    William Day
    So if a couple is barren they should not be able to be married or sexual with one another?
  • mind-pilot William... 2012/05/04 00:04:51
    mind-pilot
    That's not my point. My point is to "multiply" and inhabit the earth. If homosexuals are made in Gods likeness, they should be able to "give life". If they can't "give life" then they, eventually, won't survive. I'm not against their desires to marry or be sexual. That's fine with me. It's the "multiplying" that doesn't go in tune with the question. The comparison between the two get's totally off the truth that it's "impossible" for two women to "create life" between themselves regardless of how much they love eachother. Eventually it couldn't survive.
  • William... mind-pilot 2012/05/04 00:14:44
    William Day
    Now that's a lie, many homosexuals want children, and if everyone were homosexual there would be some kind of agreement struck to kep making children. Also the same logic DOES apply to couples who cannot concieve because if the reason you are stating is that they are not able to procreate that also applies to heterosexual couples who cannot.
  • mind-pilot William... 2012/05/04 23:59:46
    mind-pilot
    No, I'm not trying to stir a problem here. I'm talking strictly the "Gods image" question and the biological truth that two women can't "multiply", no matter how hard they try. I'm not against marriage. I'm not against "barren" women. But maybe, someday,a cure will allow a barren woman to do so if they wish. This is strictly a biological acceptance that it is impossible for two women (or two men, for that matter)to biologically multiply. Forgive me if I mistakenly crossed a boundry with marriage and love. I am not discussing that.
  • William... mind-pilot 2012/05/05 02:47:20
    William Day
    Now if we take future technology into account then it could be possible for two males or two females to make a child from their own genes. Twould be significantly harder for the males than the females but there is no reason it could not be achieved. You have not crossed a boundry between marriage and love, you are speaking of the ability to procreate, and your claim DOES apply to those who cannot conceive yet are heterosexual. I quote "the biological truth that two women can't "multiply", no matter how hard they try." that also applies to couples who are barren, they cannot conceive PERIOD, end of story, finito; they are in the same boat as what you are saying, and yet you say that it is somehow different because if they weren't barren they could. This is what is known as the fallacy of special pleading my friend.
  • mind-pilot William... 2012/05/06 01:21:50
    mind-pilot
    We're getting off the point. You issue is something that should be discussed, solely based on it's own merit. Currently we are not dealing with uncreated technology.
  • William... mind-pilot 2012/05/06 01:33:41
    William Day
    You were the one who brought up uncreated technology my friend not me. Seeing as we have a couple billion people I think we could spare a few for non-procreational purposes. Not only that but you keep making the claim that they cannot multiply and saying that somehow that doesn't apply to heterosexual couples who are unable to procreate. I would like you to describe how it is different because I see no difference there. I refer to my comment above about special pleading.
  • mind-pilot William... 2012/05/06 18:21:40
    mind-pilot
    No,no,no William. I said it is biologically impossible for two women to "multiply" ( procreate). Or, for that matter, two men to "multiply"( procreate). And that isn't a part of the nature of God.
  • William... mind-pilot 2012/05/06 19:41:30
    William Day
    Okay, neither can barren men and women but I'll set that aside. How do you know that you have the accurate vision of the nature of god?
  • mind-pilot William... 2012/05/07 15:03:21
    mind-pilot
    In my beliefs God is "Life". It is part of Gods "nature" Life continues when it is multiplied. A bird that can't procreate is extinct and life for it doesn't exist. An animal that cannot procreate becomes extinct and "life" doesn't exist for it either. If mankind can't procreate it becomes extinct and life doesn't exist for it either. And on and on and etc and etc.
  • William... mind-pilot 2012/05/07 18:34:14
    William Day
    So this only applies to homosexual couples and not ones that are heterosexual but cannot procreate?
  • mind-pilot William... 2012/05/07 18:49:12
    mind-pilot
    No. If they're biologically screwed-up, that's different.
  • William... mind-pilot 2012/05/07 19:41:02
    William Day
    How is it different?
  • mind-pilot William... 2012/05/07 22:53:05
    mind-pilot
    William, what are you looking for here? The inability to "multiply" because the parts the homosexual is using for procreation do not have the biological powers to procreate. If a homosexual is really bi-sexual then he/she can multiply. See how that works? The homosexual can "multiply" if they put the right part into the right portal. I don't know why you are so confused. Clear?
  • William... mind-pilot 2012/05/08 00:26:50
    William Day
    Yes they can, but the HETEROSEXUAL couple who CANNOT multiply is in the same boat and you are saying that they are different simply because they are heterosexual. i am asking why that is any different if neither can multiply.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Fun

2013/05/19 05:43:09

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals