Classical Music: Brilliant or Boring?
The Big Question
2012/01/24 19:20:53
|
|
|||||
|
481 votes
|
|
83% | |||
|
100 votes
|
|
17% | |||
Top Opinion
-
MorningPanda 2012/01/24 22:15:29Brilliant






















Rite of Spring, by Stravinsky. The best example of expressionism.
give the soundtrack to the movie "Amadeus" a listen ... and give it some time to sink in ... there are some melodies that are as close to heaven as can be ...
Here is the piece that really got me started in classical music, by Ra...
Here is the piece that really got me started in classical music, by Rachmaninoff:
Now, tell me this is boring! It's by Shostakovich
Now, how about Liszt?
You've probably all heard this one, and it's not boring, it's by Grieg.
And finally, Finlandia, with an incredibly exhilarating opening. By Sibelius.
So, you see, classical is not boring! It is full of music, waiting to be discovered. It is not dead, it is thriving, if only you would look. It is an incredibly fulfilling experience. But please ,watch the videos, and decide for yourself.
The overwhelming classical community had given in to serialism and all the rest, destroying worthwhile composition. If classical musicians ever want to write anything with the slightest bit of artistic merit, they have to totally reject modernism.
I would say Copland fall more into nationalism, (like Grieg, in a way) although I agree, modernism, serialism, and minimalism all seem odd to me. They are all techniques focused on what's new, and "exact" not what sounds good. You can have modern "absolute music" like Sibelius's 4th Symphony, and not completely go crazy with mathematics, form, and atonality. I wish more composers today would try that, because I'm sure they'd have a market.
Yeah. Sibelius was brilliant. Too bad he didn't write a note for half his life.