"Once it is born, it is no longer called a fetus. It is known as a "child"
That's semantics, not biological science.
"A child breathes on its own, eats on its own, can see, hear, smell, taste, and feel, and has recognizably human neurological brain activity."
These are not biological differences at all, but experiential differences. Where is your science? Why do you ignore the total lack of biological differences? The baby is totally dependent upon care of others when born and infant.
BS. Brain activity is definitely present before birth. You can see a baby wince and jerk during an abortion.
If post-birth respiration and digestion are prerequisite for life, then is the baby not alive before birth? Why is it growing? Why have an abortion to snuff-out that life that isn't alive?
Your pretexts for killing a human life are incredibly weak. Your semantics and sophistry are not science. An objective heartbeat, unique human DNA, neurological system, gender, etc are all scientific fact.
A baby is a very young child. They are not synonymous because a 12 year old would still be a child but wouldn't be a baby. Infant and baby would be synonymous.
No one is truly for abortion, it is a horrible difficult decision to make no matter what the circumstances, However, I am for the right to choose whether or not you have an abortion. It is the decision of the woman and the woman alone and it is not the business of anyone else. That, I am for.
So think they aren't alive? It's still life. People don't have the right to decide who lives and who doesn't even get a chance. I can't even bear the thought of someone ending a life before it even began...
Well my bad, i worded the question wrong, the whole reason i did this was because im doing a paper in english. Its either against abortion or for abortion, i cant go pro choice on the paper. And i cant be inbetween. I just wanted to know what other people thought.
And i respect it, but the only reason you commented in the first place, was to be a smart ass and start an argument, you can tell that by reading your first comment.
Well i respect your opinion. But abortion is one of those topics that pisses you off and its one of those topics that interest me. I wanted to know peoples opinions. If it pisses you off so bad, you didnt need to comment it in the first place.
There is no 'scientific' difference. The biological facts don't change - only the location.
Your semantics do not change biological fact. Get a clue.
It is known as a "child"
That's semantics, not biological science.
"A child breathes on its own, eats on its own, can see, hear, smell, taste, and feel, and has recognizably human neurological brain activity."
These are not biological differences at all, but experiential differences. Where is your science? Why do you ignore the total lack of biological differences?
The baby is totally dependent upon care of others when born and infant.
Ignorant Atheist idiot
No tangible biological changes occur in the two feet between inside and outside. All biological organs and capacities remain unchanged.
You have no substantive basis to justify killing a human life. You offer semantics manipulation as a pretext for snuffing out life.
Again, describing this as a 'fertilized egg' is simply ignorant and dishonest.
If post-birth respiration and digestion are prerequisite for life, then is the baby not alive before birth? Why is it growing? Why have an abortion to snuff-out that life that isn't alive?
Your pretexts for killing a human life are incredibly weak. Your semantics and sophistry are not science. An objective heartbeat, unique human DNA, neurological system, gender, etc are all scientific fact.
(Fact) Babies in the womb do in fact feel pain after about twenty weeks - and you know it.
(fact) Biological entities that are not alive do not grow, The baby is very much alive and growing in the womb. That's why it's being killed.
You have proven yourself a dishonest manipulator who ignores key facts with sophistry. You should be ashamed - but that requires a conscience.
babies are innocent...we love them
killing is murder...love is not with it
Exactly.