Are the Georgia Guidestones a Satanic Ten Commandments?

Sounds more like leftwing views than rightwing and the name R.C. Christian sounds like Republican Conservative Christian but the values spoken aren't rightwing as rightwingers don't talk about maintaining population numbers, balance with nature, guiding reproduction, improving fitness and diversity... those are all leftwing sentiments when you factor in eugenics, pro choice and environmental views. Unite humanity with a new common language, rule passion faith and tradition with tempered reason... again, leftwing sentiments. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts... again, leftwing sentiment. let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court is about as far from rightwing as you can get and etc, etc...

If it's evil, then the political left is evil. Nothing here looks like it was meant to survive a global disaster as the thing doesn't look like it could withstand being hit by a Toyota let alone a global disaster.

We don't even know if this is from a group DB, all we know is that one man paid to have it made.

I see nothing evil about it nor anything really to call it BS or that it has anything to do with human nature or utopia.

It looks like someone who means well decided to leave their mark and whether you or I agree with them means little as it's a personal marker left for future generations much like Coral Castle and other things people create for personal reasons where there's a bit of mystery about them.

Why you see it as offensive or wrong I can't imagine as I would expect you to be more considerate from your past behavior.

I do think you maybe saw the name R.C. Christian and took it to mean rightwing Christian since you referred to this as a Satanic Ten Commandments... it actually reads as if it were leftwing and speaking of tolerance, nature and balance which are all leftwing stereotypes and not rightwing or Christian.

Also, I see by reading other comments that you claim rightwing Christians defaced the monument? Your proof?

We don't know anything about who created it so how do you know Christians didn't create it or that maybe it was created to be defaced and start controversy?

You don't know do you?

You didn't even mention that part in your initial comment meaning you are trying to manipulate responses as that is, after all, the most important part of the topic which you withheld... it was defaced.

So how do you know so much about this issue while admitting you know nothing about who created it, their intentions nor do you offer proof as to who defaced it.

Sometimes, trying to manipulate a response has to be done gingerly DB as the way you did it obviously looks like sarcasm... but when you choose then to reveal why you made the topic in your responses, it looks like hate coming from you for which you laid down no foundation to explain any anger because you chose to withhold the one thing which would have made sense out of your topic.