Quantcast

Adam and Eve...

BlondieBrownEyes 2010/10/19 00:57:13
Did Adam and Eve have belly buttons?
adam eve belly buttonsnbspnbsp
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • I quit!!! 2010/10/19 01:58:24
    I quit!!!
    +6
    Only Adam and Eve and our father would truly know the answer. However, beings how that they were created rather then born probably not. But still on the other hand our Father is perfect and could see in the future. Knowing this he might have put them in place even though he did not need them for the creation of Adam and Eve. He would have done so for reason of correctness. Is say if you are going to make something you may as well get it right from the start!

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Ares 2010/10/28 01:10:59
    Ares
    +1
    whos adem and eve is that a new sitcom
  • Blondie... Ares 2010/10/30 01:17:59
  • Ares Blondie... 2010/11/02 16:02:21
    Ares
    +1
    uh my parents and i arnt religious
  • Blondie... Ares 2010/11/02 17:53:54
  • Ares Blondie... 2010/11/02 18:07:09
    Ares
    +1
    no its cool i like it this way
  • Nick~believe ^MOTOOP^ 2010/10/20 22:03:37
    Nick~believe ^MOTOOP^
    +1
    I doubt it. Like that bloke in the American telly show... Kyle xy. But the models did.
  • Liza Jane 2010/10/19 18:15:14
    Liza Jane
    +2
    Well I suppose from a Christian point of view they couldn't possibly have had bellybuttons because according to the bible they just magically appeared.

    From a realistic point of view... if they existed, they would have to have had bellybuttons because they would have to have been birthed from a woman.
  • Blondie... Liza Jane 2010/10/19 18:18:18
  • Liza Jane Blondie... 2010/10/19 18:25:04
    Liza Jane
    Right, according to the Christian bible they magically appeared, that's what I said.
  • Blondie... Liza Jane 2010/10/19 18:44:53
  • Liza Jane Blondie... 2010/10/19 18:49:07
    Liza Jane
    I'm not going to argue with you; you seem pretty nice. I don't believe that an infinite being magically created a man out of dirt and then created a woman out of his rib. It doesn't hold any water. It's probably the most unscientific explanation of how human beings started on this planet in history.
  • Blondie... Liza Jane 2010/10/19 20:12:42
  • Poppa Blues 2010/10/19 18:08:04
    Poppa Blues
    +1
    They couldn't have!
  • Leeaqua 2010/10/19 18:07:01
    Leeaqua
    Since they really didn't exist except in mythology , then NO ! And I asked this same question months ago .
  • SpyderX 2010/10/19 14:50:10
    SpyderX
    +1
    No. They had campaign buttons which read: "I LIKE IKE!" (Yeah, it was a long, long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away.....)
  • Blondie... SpyderX 2010/10/19 15:31:13
  • antiteaparty 2010/10/19 14:21:14 (edited)
    antiteaparty
    +1
    This is easy, they didn't exist so no! Only Christians think 2 white people were put in the jungle and from them Africans, Middle Easterns, Asians, South American Indians and 100's of different ethnic peoples evolved from them in just 6000 years... It sounds sooooooooo plausible!
  • Blondie... antitea... 2010/10/19 15:33:07
  • antitea... Blondie... 2010/10/19 16:11:32
    antiteaparty
    +1
    They couldn't have existed so they couldn't have had belly buttons... I can prove the Bible wrong without a doubt. Would you be open to hearing the truth?
  • Blondie... antitea... 2010/10/19 16:17:01
  • antitea... Blondie... 2010/10/19 16:55:51
    antiteaparty
    +1
    The problem is if the earth is 6000 years old, which if you believe the bible then you must believe that is the truth, then the Flood happened 4350 years ago which means everything was wiped out. There is a major problem with this lie. The Chinese calendar is 4700 years old and the Pyramids are 4600 years old. And I'm not talking about the big ones that you see daily but there were 100's built before them. They weren't wiped out either... I go into great detail on my blog on this subject.
  • Georgia50 antitea... 2010/10/19 18:25:01
    Georgia50
    Aren't you glad modern science & medicine came along so that people could live longer and undergo major surgery painlessly?

    I wonder how the writer of Genesis knew that God could perform major surgery on Adam by putting him into a deep sleep, and that God could close the wound with a skin graft. Just a hunch? Or revealed truth?
  • Blondie... Georgia50 2010/10/19 18:45:33
  • antitea... Georgia50 2010/10/19 19:08:37
    antiteaparty
    Since Adam didn't exist but in the mind of the writer of Genesis God who also don't exist didn't do anything...
  • Georgia50 antitea... 2010/10/20 12:35:20 (edited)
    Georgia50
    Right. So the moon is not a secondary source of light even if Nasa says the lunar surface is 40% glass. And God told Abraham to circumcise Isaac on the 8th after his birth just guessing the day on which blood coagulation peaks in a newborn male. And Daniel was winging it when he wrote that in the last days "knowledge would increase." Gee...it's almost as if Isaac Asimov wrote Genesis.
  • antitea... Georgia50 2010/10/20 13:49:56
    antiteaparty
    The moon reflects light and does not produce it's own light but wouldn't god already know that?

    The Bible was written in the year 400 AD by Christian Calendar... You think in the 100 thousand years previous man wouldn't have learned when to snip the tip?

    It's easy to see that man gains knowledge as time goes so to say Knowledge would increase in the last days, is not an earth breaking prediction...

    Don't you think God would have known the Earth wasn't a flat circle that the Sun revolved around? And even if you point out a few ambiguous places that the Bible may say that it doesn't then you are certainly pointing out the fact that Bible contradicts itself.

    The Psalm 104:5 and Ecclesiastes 1:5 verses from the Bible

    "He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 104:5)"

    "The LORD reigns, he is robed in majesty; the LORD is robed in majesty and is armed with strength. The world[The deceiving translators should've said "earth", not "world"] is firmly established; it cannot be moved. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 93:1)"

    "Say among the nations, "The LORD reigns." The world [Again, the deceiving translators should've said "earth", not "world"] is firmly established, it cannot be moved; he will judge the peoples with equity. (From the NIV Bible,...



    The moon reflects light and does not produce it's own light but wouldn't god already know that?

    The Bible was written in the year 400 AD by Christian Calendar... You think in the 100 thousand years previous man wouldn't have learned when to snip the tip?

    It's easy to see that man gains knowledge as time goes so to say Knowledge would increase in the last days, is not an earth breaking prediction...

    Don't you think God would have known the Earth wasn't a flat circle that the Sun revolved around? And even if you point out a few ambiguous places that the Bible may say that it doesn't then you are certainly pointing out the fact that Bible contradicts itself.

    The Psalm 104:5 and Ecclesiastes 1:5 verses from the Bible

    "He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 104:5)"

    "The LORD reigns, he is robed in majesty; the LORD is robed in majesty and is armed with strength. The world[The deceiving translators should've said "earth", not "world"] is firmly established; it cannot be moved. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 93:1)"

    "Say among the nations, "The LORD reigns." The world [Again, the deceiving translators should've said "earth", not "world"] is firmly established, it cannot be moved; he will judge the peoples with equity. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 96:10)"

    "The sun rises and the sun sets, and hurries back to where it rises. (From the NIV Bible, Ecclesiastes 1:5)"

    Ya think God would have known this was not correct...
    (more)
  • Georgia50 antitea... 2010/10/20 14:44:41
    Georgia50
    I did not say the moon produces its own light. God said it is a secondary light source for earth, which is it--inasmuch as it's reflective of the sun's light. YOU SAY the bible was written in 400 AD. I do not accept that as factual, and it's easily disproven. Right...technology stood still for centuries. Heck, most of the earth's population is still in the oxcart age. But Daniel just pulled one out of his hat. And ONLY Daniel. One prophet in a backwater empire to which the Jews were carried off as captives. Heck...merely that anything he said was captured in print is purely miraculous. Let's see..."God looks down upon the circle of the earth." If God is everywhere and looks down at the earth and sees a circle, it can only be round. The earth is not settled on tectonic plates? I did not know this.

    There is nothing easier to dispute than the bible when one approaches it as if it is a brittle, wooden letter construct. It is not, and you cannot prove otherwise.
  • Blondie... Georgia50 2010/10/20 14:45:32
  • antitea... Georgia50 2010/10/20 17:15:44
    antiteaparty
    Ok give me a date... 1 AD, 10BC, 100BC, 1000BC, 3000BC??? You pick the date... but you still have 97,000 years, give or a few thousand years, to learn when to snip the tip...

    Technology has never stood still. From the moment we learned to bash an animal over the head with a stick for food and then we took that stick, sharpened the end and stabbed the animal to Knights making their armor better with each battle to today's daily computer advances. Technology has never stood still. However, Religion has stymied progression throughout history! Just ask Galileo... Yes there are countries with oxcart technology but lets be realistic, the whole country isn't that way and the reasons are caused by 3 things; the lack of education, the lack of money and in many cases religion. BTW, religion is the cause of low education in those countries that religion stymies progress. The theory is simple, keep them uneducated and religion will rein supreme.

    Prove that Daniel actually existed and wasn't just the figment of some creative writer like the science writers of today... I give you L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology...

    The earth is on tectonic plates but it seems God didn't know that... and it seems God says the Earth is set on foundations and can never be moved... Is this a true statement? Does t...





    Ok give me a date... 1 AD, 10BC, 100BC, 1000BC, 3000BC??? You pick the date... but you still have 97,000 years, give or a few thousand years, to learn when to snip the tip...

    Technology has never stood still. From the moment we learned to bash an animal over the head with a stick for food and then we took that stick, sharpened the end and stabbed the animal to Knights making their armor better with each battle to today's daily computer advances. Technology has never stood still. However, Religion has stymied progression throughout history! Just ask Galileo... Yes there are countries with oxcart technology but lets be realistic, the whole country isn't that way and the reasons are caused by 3 things; the lack of education, the lack of money and in many cases religion. BTW, religion is the cause of low education in those countries that religion stymies progress. The theory is simple, keep them uneducated and religion will rein supreme.

    Prove that Daniel actually existed and wasn't just the figment of some creative writer like the science writers of today... I give you L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology...

    The earth is on tectonic plates but it seems God didn't know that... and it seems God says the Earth is set on foundations and can never be moved... Is this a true statement? Does the earth stay in one place and everything else move around it? If that answer is no and we both know it is then your Bible lies.

    Take a piece of paper and draw a circle. Is it flat or a ball like the Earth? Does god call the Earth flat like I posted previously or does he call it a globe that revolves around the sun like we know it does?

    I can prove and have proven the Bible is nothing more than the word of man. It's full of lies and contradictions. If it were truly the word of God there would be no doubt what God said. There would be no "My god is better than your God" because if God truly existed and he did talk to people the most powerful entity in the universe wouldn't leave it to a bunch of dumb butts to interpertate his intentions He'd make damned sure you knew exactly what he meant and if you doubted him he wouldn't turn you to pillars of salt 3000 years ago when nobody was around and couldn't prove what he did he'd do it every day until man got the message! He wouldn't tell you if you don't capitulate to his every whim you will suffer in hell and burn forever but remember always he loves you. He wouldn't tell you it's ok to kill your children because they bad mouthed you.

    Do you really think that the most powerful and all knowing being in the universe couldn't think of something more important to say in his Ten Commandments, in his top 10 most important things to hand to man then Thou shalt not covet thy neighbors ass? Or 'You shall have no other gods before Me. how about, You shall not make for yourself a carved image--any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. and Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.... I mean really??? This is the most powerful beings top things to say... Nothing about curing cancer, or DNA, or keeping children from starving to death... Don't get a tattoo, take Sunday off, I'm jealous, and don't be a wantin your neighbors ass... especially if shes married her husband may come home and catch you (lol)... This sounds like mans limited Knowledge of the day, not the most powerful entity in the universe!
    (more)
  • therainbowsshadow 2010/10/19 14:03:43
    therainbowsshadow
    +1
    That's a good question, and I agree w/Mugahead entirely.
  • Rampant Andie 2010/10/19 06:16:15
    Rampant Andie
    +1
    Well, if Adam and Eve truly existed exactly as the Bible said, then I would guess they didn't have belly buttons. There'd have been no reason for them.
  • Blondie... Rampant... 2010/10/19 15:34:26
  • Kev316 2010/10/19 04:59:10
    Kev316
    +2
    Do primates?
  • Blondie... Kev316 2010/10/19 15:35:13
  • Mrkando 2010/10/19 03:44:48
    Mrkando
    +1
    Dang! You know the last time I saw them I never even looked. Sorry I have no idea. :-)
    Of course it could be my memory is slipping too. You know it was a while back. LOL
  • Blondie... Mrkando 2010/10/19 15:35:31
  • Astro-Boy PHAET 2010/10/19 03:23:17
    Astro-Boy PHAET
    +3
    I doubt not seeing as I don't think they are real.
  • j2 2010/10/19 02:46:08
    j2
    +1
    Conceptually? Maybe. Adam & Eve are the Jehovistic creation story. They don't appear in the Elohimistic creation story. They're not even completely woven into one coherent saga.
  • Rick 2010/10/19 02:41:37
    Rick
    +2
    Don't know. They didn't need them. But they were fully grown when they were one day old.
  • Blondie... Rick 2010/10/19 15:36:03

Fun

2013/05/19 07:44:41

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals