Would you spend $3,195.14, the average ticket price for Super Bowl 2013, to watch the big game?

by ABC News Money Posted 2013/01/21 19:12:32

Related Topics: Super Bowl, Baltimore Ravens, Football, Money, Situation, Watch, Game, Market, Bowl, Image, Special, 2013, Baltimore, Images, Lifetime

Read More

12,670 votes
Read all 150 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes, it's a once-in-a-lifetime experience.	299 votes	2%
	No, that's too much money for one football game.	11,499 votes	91%
	Maybe in a special situation, such as if my favorite team played.	872 votes	7%

Now that the two teams for Super Bowl 2013 are known, fans of the San Francisco 49ers and Baltimore Ravens who don’t have tickets are off to the secondary market, where the average price of a ticket is about $3,195.14.

As of Monday morning, the lowest price for resale tickets was $2,168, according to ticket tracker TiqIQ. Last year, the average price on Jan. 21 was $3,678.12, with the lowest price, $2,037.

Add a comment above

democoach 2013/01/22 14:01:08

No, that's too much money for one football game.

+5
waste of money waste of time, even if the ticket was 100$ i would not spend it!

besides

>> See Replies

More polls by ABC News Money

wiredworx 2013/02/14 08:32:42

Maybe in a special situation, such as if my favorite team played.

nice

reply
Susai 2013/02/09 05:05:02

No, that's too much money for one football game.

I would see ia on tv with better commentry and replays

reply
rwal2222 2013/02/02 15:53:28

Maybe in a special situation, such as if my favorite team played.

worst stupidbowl ever, featuring the Harbarf brothers! lmao!! The only thing worth seeing is Ray Lewis play is last game. Oh tickets are now $1400 a seat, and dropping fast, so just goes to show no body gives a crap this year. In fact, the fans should boycott until the NFL gets it right, Has-ben-oynce half time show??? Good god....I'm gonna be sick. Off to the movies for me....GO HAWKS!!

reply
Dick Nixon 2013/01/30 18:09:46

No, that's too much money for one football game.

Never. Those guys on the field are no more important than we are...

reply
tgoose61 2013/01/30 01:28:57

Maybe in a special situation, such as if my favorite team played.

Well then, is 6 minutes too much of your time to see this documentary on this hardworking high school kid who barely plays? http://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Ask yourself that question after you answered this silly one.

reply
mal 2013/01/30 00:29:38

No, that's too much money for one football game.

Have a 60 inch panasonic plasma t.v.

reply
Moodybloo70 2013/01/29 12:37:12

Maybe in a special situation, such as if my favorite team played.

If I could stand on the sideline I would pay 3 Grand....

reply
liz 2013/01/26 19:31:01

Maybe in a special situation, such as if my favorite team played.

& If I had a great job that would allow me to afford that...

reply
Ashley 2013/01/25 22:59:28

No, that's too much money for one football game.

It is not worth the money. All over paid and millionaires complaining.

reply
ellie. 2013/01/25 12:39:52

Maybe in a special situation, such as if my favorite team played.

As a Lions fan, if they got into the Super Bowl, I'd give my left arm to see it.

reply
BBoy legacy 2013/01/25 05:22:58

No, that's too much money for one football game.

Not much of an NFL fan, but even if I was and had the money I wouldn't do it because that money could go to something that would benefit me more, or better yet; someone else.

reply
flowercivic 2013/01/24 01:41:03

No, that's too much money for one football game.

+1

Only when I can afford to wipe like this daily!

reply
tom C 2013/01/23 17:19:51 (edited)

Maybe in a special situation, such as if my favorite team played.

+1
honestly...the best seat...is at home watching...everything on TV in HD on a big screen.....

get all the replays...and interviews you won't see at the game..

reply
Pistol Pete 2013/01/23 01:39:49 (edited)

No, that's too much money for one football game.

Better view and better food and drinks either in the bar or at home. Who wants a $8.00 beer, and a $7.00 hot dog when I can eat gourmet food for half that at the bar??? $20.00 to park my car, then squeeze my fat ass into a small, cold seat. THEN, when I am finally settled in, some LAMO wants to get out for some reason and squeezes by me a half dozen times. No thanks!!!

reply
vinone 2013/01/22 23:53:43

Yes, it's a once-in-a-lifetime experience.

Sure, if I have money to spend why not?

reply
Tordgaard 2013/01/22 23:04:10

No, that's too much money for one football game.

...not a chance.

reply
joe mauro 2013/01/22 22:53:54

No, that's too much money for one football game.

i wouldnt spend 300

reply
♒ßεllεchεvεllε®♒ 2013/01/22 22:33:12

No, that's too much money for one football game.

reply
baby cakes 826 2013/01/22 22:32:40

No, that's too much money for one football game.

+1
Rather get a front row seat right on my couch and spend the money on a new pair of shoes instead...

reply
BBoy le... to baby ca... 2013/01/25 05:25:17

+2
Spend $3,195.14 on shoes?

reply
baby ca... to BBoy le... 2013/01/25 16:34:07

haha is that a real question?

reply
BBoy le... to baby ca... 2013/02/02 01:36:41

+1
Well for a girl... probably not.

reply
Patric 2013/01/22 22:30:14

Yes, it's a once-in-a-lifetime experience.

not only would ,,, I did

took son and daughter to Detroit to watch the Pittsburgh Steelers defeat the Seahawks ...

$10,000 for 3 tickets.,, and I thought it was a bargain,, once in a life time experiences are not able to price on them,,, so gratfull for the oportunity ,,,

reply
joe mauro to Patric 2013/01/22 22:54:54

+1
you must work for the government

reply
Patric to joe mauro 2013/01/23 10:36:07

+1
well, technicaly , the first 5 months of the year goes to paying my taxes ,
so , I guess you are correct ...

reply
joe mauro to Patric 2013/01/23 20:37:18

good for you

reply
Patric to joe mauro 2013/01/24 20:38:39

actually , yes it is good,

this ,IMO, is the greatest country on Earth, and I am lucky to be a live here ..

reply
joe mauro to Patric 2013/01/24 22:32:16

so true thats for sure enjoy your money!!!!!!

reply
Patric to joe mauro 2013/01/25 16:16:38

I do,, I am very aware of where and on what I spend my $$

I do not do business with businesss that is against my beliefs ..

you should be here to listen when abortion clinics call looking for donations..

reply
joe mauro to Patric 2013/01/25 18:58:12

why are you insulting me, i wished you well,i dont get it, i thought you were a nice person,i hope you enjoy yourself,whats wrong with that?Do i detect guilt>???

reply
Patric to joe mauro 2013/01/26 15:05:29

+1
insult ?

if I did, I apologize , it was unintentional ..

reading my previous post , I do not see where you think I insulted you ,
but , please take my sorry for what ever slight you felt I posted.

deal ?

reply
joe mauro to Patric 2013/01/27 06:48:50

ok thanks

reply
cheryl 2013/01/22 22:26:57

Yes, it's a once-in-a-lifetime experience.

i would if i could.can,t afford it.

reply
kashmirknight 2013/01/22 22:17:33

Yes, it's a once-in-a-lifetime experience.

Would love too, but couldn't justify it!!!!

reply
rusty.barnett.16 2013/01/22 19:56:15

No, that's too much money for one football game.

+1
Hell I can buy a 100 in Flat Screen TV for that. And I can watch the next 10 Super Bowls on IT>

reply
joe dirt 2013/01/22 19:41:26

No, that's too much money for one football game.

+1
I wouldn't spend 50 cents to watch a bunch of illiterate bunch of idiots run up and down a field with a fooball (football) that make more in one year than I make in a life time and I pitty to fools that have nothing better to do than to watch them on tv. I would rather watch Lindsey Lohan than watch those idiots that can't even talk right and have no education what so ever.

reply
Guru_T_Firefly 2013/01/22 19:13:18

No, that's too much money for one football game.

+1
I wouldn't give a Canadian quarter to see it. I think it should be replaced with nude female hockey.

reply
Mike to Guru_T_... 2013/01/22 21:50:17

+1
Ouch ....why Hockey..?...that would hurt falling on that ice....let's do it with Basketball...or Volleyball....or I know...Golf or Tennis!..haha

reply
Guru_T_... to Mike 2013/01/22 21:53:38 (edited)

+1
Not all hockey is played on ice.

Besides, it could bring a whole new meaning to the term "slap shot".

reply
Mike to Guru_T_... 2013/01/22 21:59:25

+1
haha.....gotcha..! RAVE!

reply