Who Was the Most Glamorous Woman at Glamour's Women of the Year Awards?
SodaHead Slideshows
2012/05/31 15:00:00
SLIDESHOW: Most 'Glamorous' Woman of the Year?
1 of 9
Lily Collins
Glamour magazine held its annual Women of the Year Awards in London on Tuesday, and young Lily Collins (Phil Collins' 23-year-old daughter) really did look like a real-life Snow White.
Who Was the Most Glamorous Woman at Glamour's Women of the Year Awards?
|
|
|||||
|
671 votes
|
|
29% | |||
|
161 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
155 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
195 votes
|
|
8% | |||
|
350 votes
|
|
15% | |||
|
378 votes
|
|
16% | |||
|
192 votes
|
|
8% | |||
|
170 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
76 votes
|
|
3% | |||
Who is the most glamorous of them all? Glamour magazine held its annual Women of the Year Awards in London on Tuesday, and young Lily Collins (Phil Collins' 23-year-old daughter) really did look like a real-life Snow White (skin as white as snow, lips as red as blood, hair as black as ebony...).
Naomi Watts also earned a lot of attention for showing a bit of "sideboob" in her lace Versace dress, while Sofia Vergara and Eva Longoria were the hottest ladies in red. Meanwhile, "Dancing With the Stars" runner-up Katherine Jenkins looked slimmer than ever (perhaps a bit too skinny?).
From Lily to Naomi to Sofia, click through our slideshow and let us know: Who was the most glamorous woman at Glamour's Women of the Year Awards?
Naomi Watts also earned a lot of attention for showing a bit of "sideboob" in her lace Versace dress, while Sofia Vergara and Eva Longoria were the hottest ladies in red. Meanwhile, "Dancing With the Stars" runner-up Katherine Jenkins looked slimmer than ever (perhaps a bit too skinny?).
From Lily to Naomi to Sofia, click through our slideshow and let us know: Who was the most glamorous woman at Glamour's Women of the Year Awards?






















Glamour is kind of a worthless quality, so I really don't care. I didn't see this--didn't even know it existed until now. I just chose this gal because she had a pretty dress.
What the heck was that item that Naomi Watts was wearing?
Why was it necessary to bring Katherine Jenkins' size into this? People, especially women, really can't win. If they have an ounce of fat, they are decried as "EWWWW, SO FAAAAAAT!" by our idiot society, and then we wonder why girls have eating disorders. But if they look thin, you get "OMG, SHE'S SO SKINNY--TOO SKINNY?" Crap--knock it off! So shallow.
I honestly don't know who most of these people are. I guess they're very glamorous though.
Naomi - looks kinda good but still not glamorous. Also there's no sideboob because there's no boob at all
Katherine - sexy as all hell, love the dress and boobs, but not exactly glamorous
Sofia - clearly the most glamorous here
Lea - has a kinda manly face and having her hair up wasn't a good look.
Jessica - once again, pretty and cute but not quite glamorous. On the right track though
Eva - okayy but bright orange is never glamorous
Kelly - looking very nice. Probably the second most glamorous
Cat - never heard of her and she looks boring and frumpy
Beautiful as always.