
Who Should NOT Have Posed for Playboy?
SodaHead Slideshows
2011/12/08 18:00:00
SLIDESHOW: Who Should NOT Have Posed for Playboy?
1 of 9
Lindsay Lohan
Lohan's Playboy cover has leaked online, thanks to The Insider, which raves that she "looks top notch." Well, maybe she does, but should she really be posing on the cover of Playboy to begin with?
Who Should NOT Have Posed for Playboy?
|
|
|||||
|
3,884 votes
|
|
21% | |||
|
1,396 votes
|
|
8% | |||
|
2,143 votes
|
|
12% | |||
|
1,609 votes
|
|
9% | |||
|
1,702 votes
|
|
9% | |||
|
1,441 votes
|
|
8% | |||
|
1,061 votes
|
|
6% | |||
|
887 votes
|
|
5% | |||
|
4,455 votes
|
|
24% | |||
Call it a ... comeback? Lindsay Lohan's Playboy cover has leaked online, thanks to "The Insider," which raves that she "looks top notch." Well, maybe she does, but should she really be posing on the cover of Playboy to begin with? Take a look for yourself:

Lohan, 25, has never been shy about nudity, and the shoot is reportedly NOT full frontal. So really, you're not seeing much more of Lindsay than you have in the past. Plus, Lohan is set to reveal the entire spread on the Dec. 15 episode of "The Ellen DeGeneres Show" -- so how racy can it be?
On the cover, she's straddling the Playboy logo, which pretty much hides everything. "The pictorial is absolutely fantastic and very tasteful, and will be accompanied by an interview that will let readers see another side of Lindsay," Lohan's publicist Steve Honig said, according to various reports.
Lohan was reportedly paid $1 million for the shoot -- pretty easy money for a day's work. But given that she's still trying to rehabilitate her jail- and drug-stained reputation, was posing nude really a great idea?
From Lohan to Denise Richards to Shannen Doherty, click through our slideshow and let us know: Which celeb should NOT have posed for Playboy?

Lohan, 25, has never been shy about nudity, and the shoot is reportedly NOT full frontal. So really, you're not seeing much more of Lindsay than you have in the past. Plus, Lohan is set to reveal the entire spread on the Dec. 15 episode of "The Ellen DeGeneres Show" -- so how racy can it be?
On the cover, she's straddling the Playboy logo, which pretty much hides everything. "The pictorial is absolutely fantastic and very tasteful, and will be accompanied by an interview that will let readers see another side of Lindsay," Lohan's publicist Steve Honig said, according to various reports.
Lohan was reportedly paid $1 million for the shoot -- pretty easy money for a day's work. But given that she's still trying to rehabilitate her jail- and drug-stained reputation, was posing nude really a great idea?
From Lohan to Denise Richards to Shannen Doherty, click through our slideshow and let us know: Which celeb should NOT have posed for Playboy?
Top Opinion
-
Lindsay Lohan+22lindsay looks like a crack whore...period lol i don't think any amount of editing can fix that. she's young and actually looks older than her mom.






















Could you show us the original photos so we can all judge?
SEXY!!!!!!! LOL JK.
....to this....
sigh!!!!!!!
Posing for Playboy has always been a hit-or-miss proposition. Usually, though, the posers' carreers are flat-lining in the first place so they try to get a boost from the photoshoot. Many other women have posed and had succesful carreers and happy lives. This list just happens to pick women who are not A-list material.
I would do it, I think they pose the women in good taste. They feature them beautifully.
Unlike Hustler or another nasty ones!
I remember way back...they had a woman on the cover...then inside she had freckles all over, they airbrushed them all off on the cover....lol
Lindsay...what happened?
http://www.LittleScroll.com
If they all want to pose for Playboy or any other mag, let 'em... they're all hot... if anyone on the list is the least hot, it would be Suzanne Somers... but still good-looking enough for me...