Which is better? the undiscovered bands or the top 40?
Shay
2011/01/31 04:12:36
|
|
|||||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | |||
|
4 votes
|
|
67% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
33% | |||
love both but both have down sides. some top 40 sucks and sometimes there's a reason bands arent really discovered
Top Opinion
-
GirlGoingGreen 2011/01/31 04:15:25Undiscovered
+3There are SO many undiscovered bands that should be in the top 40, but for some crazy reason they aren't! I guess its because lots of people allow the charts to control and regulate what they listen to. The top 40 stinks. It's rare when there is a song that I enjoy on there. Undiscovered indie bands is the way to go. ;)
Sort By
- N/A 2011/01/31 12:25:26Undecided
Some Undiscovered bands are good, some Top 40 (when in Rock/Metal/Pop) are good. It depends what country the top 40 is from, in Sweden; In flames had a song on #2 for good while.reply - GirlGoingGreen 2011/01/31 04:15:25Undiscovered+3There are SO many undiscovered bands that should be in the top 40, but for some crazy reason they aren't! I guess its because lots of people allow the charts to control and regulate what they listen to. The top 40 stinks. It's rare when there is a song that I enjoy on there. Undiscovered indie bands is the way to go. ;)reply
- Feria~THEZombieSlayingB!tch... 2011/01/31 04:14:36UndecidedI like both to be honest.reply
