What is the Most Important Vow to Make to Your Soul Mate?

To be by their side and to love and to cherish all of them :O apart from to beat them at words with their friends

aww hunni i love you oh so much :* to be by your side i always will be :*

To be with them through thick and thin.

ALL OF THE ABOVE!!!!!!!!!!!be a friend AND lover at all times.

That's just some bull crap right there. To Beat them at words with freinds??? Y'all are puthetic.!.

To always talk over everthing with her and try my best to be clear in my point of view.

That or to not-transform-into-a-giant-wo...

Really ! I can't believe some of y'all people!

dont they all kinda mean the same things?

If you can not keep your marriage vows - then do not get married.

Without love, it seems empty..

don't learn to cherish after u lose it.

to love and cherish, also, To work to stay together happily...otherwise......whats really the point?!?! 2012.

I love you with all my heart, body and soul. Til death do us part.

you do this and everything else falls into place.

Everything else goes up and down. But being by their side is the one constant.

Love (Agape - unconditional love) constitute it all! To love and to cherish, for better or for worst, being by each other side until death do us apart! I personally take my wedding vows very seriously unto the Lord!

One you can Bloody keep!!!!

And to beat them at words with friends !!! To bad there has to be a loser !! //:

Marriage Vow is old school. It has become ONLY a contract to give at LEAST HALF your worldly assets up to the female if things do not last. Stupid of ANY guy (or female, if she has more assets than the guy) to sign. If and when (the odds of divorce are now over 60%) the marriage goes bad, the guy is in the legal battle of his life. Often times leaving him bankrupt and the rest of his life in shambles. All because of signing a contract when he was at his weakest point, when his hormones were raging.

You bring up some very valid arguments and for those that want to stay single I say go for it. Marriage is not for everyone, and it takes work by both to make it work. I have been very fortunate to have a wonderful wife but I do look around and see how the courts in California treat men and it is not fair and equal, from visitation to alimony, but also just because some guy has raging hormones that is plain dumb. I am a few years older than you but I never let mine rule my judgement.

I have NO idea how old you think I am. I am 60 years old.

But, even If the male cheats, that is nowhere enough reason to take half his assets. It has gotten wacky, it is so unfair. And, what about the flip side. My EX wife cheated on ME. Should I have taken half of her assets? Luckily for me, we BOTH had our own money, equal value. Yet, my Mother in Law got her to go after me anyhow. She was unsuccessful, but I would NEVER again allow anyone that close to my assets. Living together is just as good. Even if you have children. I have nothing against FAIR child Support. Against ANY form of Alimony. WHAT idiot ever legitimized "keeping the woman in the style to which she has become accustomed"??????? WTF? That is a lifetime prison sentence.

Till death do ye part

Continuing to cherish someone keeps an appreciative quality to loving them that is essential, IMO.

'The Vow' is from Australia. The SH account's a new one. Hm (with raised eyebrow).
And I don't want to hurt your feelings (Schick), but somebody sent him/her/it a friend invite, and he/she/it accepted it. He/she/it even answered another question. In the event you're remotely interested, he/she/it is not superstitious. AHA HA HA!

Edit:
But back to your comment: you hit the nose on the hammer (I love effing up metaphors): genuine appreciation, and I would add physical affection.

'Schik' is also from Australia. And, they both have the same SH start date (a month ago). Concidence?...hmm =D But, 'Schik' has not logged in since he/she/its start date, yet anyway. So, there is still hope and anticipation =]

I'm wooing one... I don't think I should split my focus by giving my attention to another that I don't have anything invested in and possibly jeopardize my initial petition (Schik)... a much more satisfying catch! =) And, I DID check out this he/she/it when I initially answered here and found... it had friended! Ahaha... and answered a question! I believe this is better than levels!! Ahaha... IMO =] We shall see. The suspense continues...

Edit:
Yes, 'mandatory holdings' for some =D It is impossible to NOT feel close and loving when you add physical affection. That's a very nice and essential add that many people probably wouldn't think of :)

Well, when you know what you want, you've got to go after it, right? Keep casting that line; he's bound to take the bate eventually. But you're right, you can't split your focus ...horrible tactical error. I wonder what size shoe he wears, know what I mean?

No, I don't know what you mean, Ysggirb. I have absolutely no idea what you mean. Even if you explained it, I'm sure I would still not know what you mean, so best not to bother. But, if I had to guess I might say it had something to do with throwing a hammer in and tootsies. I'm not sure how the nose fits in with all that, except that I don't nose what on earth you mean. Tactical error?? I avoid those whenever possible :)

You are quite vexing :| ... ... :]

If you multiply this (v) times two, you will see the issue with largess (...and expansion expectations... if you know what I mean...) that I currently have to deal with. My keyboard is fighting to not get pushed over the edge as I type, lol (they loooove to stretch). I'll either have to find a larger surface or ....find a larger surface, lol...

(this one (^) can't match my 2 in cuteness or sweetness ... 'little beauties♥' ^.^ ) ...I'm afraid I may have unwittingly developed this...


Edit: I just used a sidestep diversionary tactic. I can't tell you how long I considered your graphic :)x6 ...or that it's perfect. No, I probably shouldn't do that :}

Binomial nomenclature …oh, you’re in for it now. If it’s been determined a separate species name is required, I'm afraid there’s no hope at all.

Sidestep diversionary tactic noted and officially objected to. I’ve just re-read the rules for diversionary tactics, and I've noted something you may not be aware of; there’s an ‘Exceptions and Exclusions’ section at the back of the book. I will now quote from that section. (Please remember, I am simply quoting from something somebody ELSE wrote.)

Ahem!

Exclusion 98.804(c)(1)(A):
“You can’t to that! What? Divert a double-entendred discussion regarding large feet with fuzzy little kittens (even if they are a bit mischievous). Are you pulling my plonker? No. Completely acceptable. No.”

Well, that’s what is says. If you don’t believe me, you can check out Wikipedia:
www.wikipedia/areyoupullingmy...

there z no love without chrishing each other.

For heaven sake please use spell check

Sorry but idt we have to;)

Not a fan of the term "soul mate", but I believe the most important thing in a relationship is honesty. The rest depends on your personal preferences.

Because to love paraphrases everything else

My own being and not to be with someone just because you're married. First of all it's my happiness before some guy.

I love this movie.