WATCH > Should 'Dexter' Go After Casey Anthony?

by SodaHead TV Posted 2011/07/11 19:13:46

Related Topics: Dexter, Dexter Morgan, Casey Anthony, Murder, Michael C Hall, TV Show, Guilty, Killer, TMZ, SodaHead, rumors, Watch, Spoof, Hunting, Not

Read More

122 votes
Read all 101 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	79 votes	65%
	No	43 votes	35%

As far as we know, Michael C. Hall's character on "Dexter" will not be hunting down a soon-to-be released Casey Anthony -- even though catching murderers who escape the paws of justice is the guy's job. (And hobby.)

Hall has been shooting down rumors all week, TMZ reports:

You're confusing fiction with reality.

But here's the spoof that started the rumors, and we have to admit we would totally watch it.

Add a comment above

DanMadison 2011/07/11 22:23:27

No

+5
This question isn't very tasteful.

Who are we (or Dexter) to disagree with a jury? They are the ones who went through all the evidence and came to a decision. That's the way the jury system works.

In any case, the real solution would be to remove double jeopardy and re-try her if compelling new evidence arose.
>> See Replies

More polls by SodaHead TV

Tom 2011/07/22 05:31:06

Yes

too bad dexter isnt real

reply
Dagon 2011/07/15 05:16:30
whipnet 2011/07/15 03:27:55

Yes

This came out of my mouth mere moments after the verdict.

Best show on TV.

*

reply
Wikidnezz ;D 2011/07/15 01:04:16

Yes

She would deserve it... Plus I find that would be a great episode haha ;D

reply
mewycg 2011/07/15 00:51:58

No

+1
Was Dexter going to apply duct tape and a heart shaped sticker? After a little chloroform and a stint in the trunk? And eye for an eye, nah, it wouldn't balance, she's not a serial killer....yet.

reply
bags 2011/07/15 00:07:50

No

+1
She's not a serial killer, it would violate the code.

Dammit, Harry.

reply
Hukaatir 2011/07/15 00:06:25

Yes

Now that would be cool

reply
Jack's Pearl 2011/07/15 00:05:01

No

+1
No more attention to her. This is glorifying her situation. Who knows what we are truly glorifying here too! Yuck! I don't want to see her face.

reply
ELLIE 2011/07/13 14:50:45

Yes

Be a great case for him.

reply
Karl 2011/07/13 05:48:57

No

+1
It sounds like it's time to move on from Casey to whatever new tragedy that people seem to love to hear about.

reply
Ava Alexander 2011/07/12 23:45:16

Yes

HAHAHAHA!!! I've never seen the show, but know the premise, and in a bad way, that would be funny.

reply
mae 2011/07/12 19:55:34

No

+1
It does make one think, but,.... No, this comes off as tacky.

reply
S123 2011/07/12 19:08:04

No

+1
A fictional character killing a real person. How would that work?

reply
Just_Pietzche 2011/07/12 17:54:37

No

+1
The fact that Casey Anthony was found not guilty means there is not enough evidence to prove her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. However unjust anybody thinks the finding may be, it is the finding that was made based on the evidence against her. She has not been proven guilty, and should therefore be considered innocent.

reply
HearnoEvil 2011/07/12 17:03:12

Yes

lmao! Why not? :))

reply
HearnoEvil to HearnoEvil 2011/07/12 17:04:09

:p

reply
synful90 2011/07/12 14:05:25

Yes

oh my if only lol then justice would REALLY be served

reply
Student 2011/07/12 13:21:50

No

+1
It's over, people.

reply
XxitaliandrummerXx 2011/07/12 12:51:15

Yes

hell yea.....i love his evil smiles

reply
ally 2011/07/12 12:33:39

Yes

Where's Dexter when you need him?!!

reply
Moejj 2011/07/12 10:53:29

Yes

Can't have justice in reality, why not a cool tv show?

reply
Kelly 2011/07/12 10:00:29

Yes

LOL now that was too funny, too bad its not what he does in real life lol, but that was cute

reply
MOMMA THOMAS 2011/07/12 09:45:03

No

+2
SHE HAS DEMONS TO DEAL WITH WORSE THAN DEXTER..

reply
Captain Spaulding (Movie-Guy) 2011/07/12 09:42:40

Yes

hahaha this is too funny

reply
Lacy Anne 2011/07/12 07:04:41

Yes

+1
Heck why not? It's just for fun.

reply
llshadowz 2011/07/12 06:31:55

No

+2
That is such a stupid Idea. Now, if "Dexter" was real...

reply
wcpjams 2011/07/12 05:13:05

Yes

+4
I don't watch that show, but she needs to pay for what she did to that beautiful child who couldn't even fight back. I strongly believe in the death penalty, when the victim is an innocent child.

reply
stargazing* 2011/07/12 04:37:54

No

+3
Let's not let her have any more attention.

reply
dexter 2011/07/12 04:37:10
Lo_Ocy 2011/07/12 04:17:48

Yes

+2
phahahahahha yea

reply
RobertRowe 2011/07/12 03:32:26

Yes

+2
they just might use that as a storyline like how law and order always uses the headlines for episodes.

reply
Link 2011/07/12 02:58:54

Yes

+2
Yes, by all means and please do... and I'll keep the cops busy as a distraction... Oh, and I'll keep Rita busy, too, for Dexter...

reply
The Berserker 2011/07/12 02:01:45

No

+4
Does the term "innocent until proven guilty" mean anything to you?

reply
Dagon to The Ber... 2011/07/15 05:20:39
mind-pilot 2011/07/12 01:59:24

Yes

+2
Well, if you really know she's guilty of killing Caylee and there's no question beyond the shadow of a doubt, then send in Dexter. Otherwise find the killer and let Dexter punish him. Or just kill them both because they "might not" be one in the same and you're total need for instant gratification will be satisfied. But if she's not guilty you have to confess for her. And we'll send Dexter after you. That's fair. It is done.....Or, Give it to God and be done with it.

reply
RandomMusicXD 2011/07/12 01:50:09

Yes

+2
Lol; I'd have to most definitely watch that episode.

reply
Otaku Link 2011/07/12 01:48:52

No

+2
seriously?
what a bunch of dipsh*ts!

reply
Kigan 2011/07/12 01:39:53

No

+2
Dexter is a fictional TV show.

If ever the show is that desperate to involve her, it will be a signal of the end of the show.

reply
Mellow 2011/07/12 01:39:18

Yes

+2
That would be an awesome episode.

reply
Seiryuu 2011/07/12 00:14:30

No

+2
First of all, he goes after serial killers.
Second, he makes sure they've gotten away with it yet have definite incriminating evidence on them.
Third, he makes sure whether or not they're remorseful (that is, feel bad and not kill anymore) before he does them in.

Get your facts straight, people.

reply