As many as each person can support 100% by themselves.
Have all you want, as long as you don't take a penny of government money or social services.
Victoria Beckham Says 'Never Say Never' on Baby No. 5: How Many Kids Is Too Many?
SodaHead Celebs
2012/08/02 16:19:55
|
|
|||||
|
58 votes
|
|
12% | |||
|
31 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
56 votes
|
|
12% | |||
|
67 votes
|
|
14% | |||
|
76 votes
|
|
16% | |||
|
186 votes
|
|
39% | |||
Victoria Beckham already has three sons, a baby daughter and a rich, handsome husband. But the 38-year-old Spice Girl turned fashion mogul may want to expand her family.
Asked where she sees herself and her family in five years, Beckham tells the September issue of Glamour: "I'd never say never about another baby. It’s a juggling act -- a career, family, a husband who’s busy. But I’d never say never!"
As for why she's never seen smiling, she explains, "Do you know, I don’t know?! I actually used to smile a lot in pictures. I think I only stopped smiling when I got into fashion. [Laughs.] Fashion stole my smile! I’ve created this person. And I’m not saying that’s not me, but I wouldn’t say that’s the whole me…. It’s an armor that goes up."
Like most 30-something married women, she's been spending some time reading the racy "Fifty Shades of Grey" trilogy. "I’m halfway through the second one. I even bought my mum the book! But every time she tries to engage in conversation about it, I kind of dodge the subject. I don’t really want to talk to my mother about S&M.;"
And as successful as she is, she still gets nervous before a fashion show -- and turns to her hubby for support. "He phoned me the night before, and I just said, 'I want you to come be with me. I want a cuddle. I really do.'" Aw ... do you think Victoria should go for baby no. 5? Or are four kids more than enough?
Asked where she sees herself and her family in five years, Beckham tells the September issue of Glamour: "I'd never say never about another baby. It’s a juggling act -- a career, family, a husband who’s busy. But I’d never say never!"
As for why she's never seen smiling, she explains, "Do you know, I don’t know?! I actually used to smile a lot in pictures. I think I only stopped smiling when I got into fashion. [Laughs.] Fashion stole my smile! I’ve created this person. And I’m not saying that’s not me, but I wouldn’t say that’s the whole me…. It’s an armor that goes up."
Like most 30-something married women, she's been spending some time reading the racy "Fifty Shades of Grey" trilogy. "I’m halfway through the second one. I even bought my mum the book! But every time she tries to engage in conversation about it, I kind of dodge the subject. I don’t really want to talk to my mother about S&M.;"
And as successful as she is, she still gets nervous before a fashion show -- and turns to her hubby for support. "He phoned me the night before, and I just said, 'I want you to come be with me. I want a cuddle. I really do.'" Aw ... do you think Victoria should go for baby no. 5? Or are four kids more than enough?
Top Opinion
-
Lanikai 2012/08/02 17:35:19
How scan this be enforced?
Reversible sterilisation procedures.
Reversible sterilization? Your kidding right. #1) It would be absolutely and unequivocally impossible to enforce. #2) Who would make the decision about when someone is to be deemed "capable"? #3) China already has restrictions on the number of children a couple may have, is that really what you would want? #4) What if you were sterilized and then decided that you were ready and then the person, or board, that decides if you are "capable" or not, decides that you are not capable. #5) Another Government control in our lives and then where does it stop? Maybe because of food shortages in some countries the world government says that we can only eat one meal a day even though we may be growing our own food. Even though those other countries may have the resources and manpower to sustain themselves. Share and share alike right?
2). The decision: we all would have a say to come to an understanding. This wouldn't be something that is passed after a short period of consideration. Years, perhaps to come to a viable agreement?
3). Not a restriction on the # of children, just a sensible assessment of what a couple is actually able to raise.
4). The idea is that these 'standards' would be fair and reasonable and that I and my spouse would have to be able to show proof of our commitment and ability...
5). Well, a government that is truly "by the people". Not just in rhetoric.
As I read this I see how impossible it is. Lion with the lamb sort of dream.
But if the world were full of responsible individuals making up a responsible 'whole', then certainly Earth would be able to supply the needs for all. Simplistic, I know. Wow! What a buffoon I am to hope for something so unreasonable. Uuhmmmmm...where have I been my entire life? Time to wake up and feed the chickens.
See ya.
experience everything that comes with being a mother.
There should be some mathematical equation that takes into account your income, responsibility, and stupidity to determine how many kids you can have.