Quantcast

'Twins' Sequel Is In the Works, Eddie Murphy Likely to Join: Fun or Facepalm?

The Big Question 2012/03/31 00:33:23
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Kozman smitty 2012/03/31 18:34:59
    Kozman
    +1
    YUMMY!!!
  • Th8nos 2012/03/31 16:53:24
    Facepalm
    Th8nos
    are all three of them broke? So they're just going to ridicule themselves....
  • Brosia 2012/03/31 16:48:16
    Facepalm
    Brosia
    +1
    I could almost buy the first one, but now I am supposed to buy that they had the technology in the 50's to split race as well as every other attribute? I call shenanigans!
    shenanigans
  • luke-jones 2012/03/31 16:44:19
    Facepalm
    luke-jones
    +1
    We don't need to see it again. Besides, it's Arnold and Danny's movie.
  • Aingean 2012/03/31 16:25:38
    Facepalm
    Aingean
    +1
    I didn't like the first one so I will not be seeing this one. Even if Eddie Murphy is in it.
  • janet 2012/03/31 15:49:17
    Facepalm
    janet
    +2
    I thought the first one was a silly movie, why bother to make a second one.

    Goodness Hollywood can we please get a few new creative writers on board,, Hello!!!
  • Manster janet 2012/03/31 19:14:42 (edited)
    Manster
    +3
    They don't care about the consumers or the product unless they already know that it has blockbuster status written all over it from the start! Doing these silly remakes saves them money on advertising because people are already familiar with the characters,so they just take them and put them in a different setting,and if we stay away from the cinema,they'll have it released on video within a month to recoup their initial invesatment as soon as possible. It's a terrible state of affairs!
  • janet Manster 2012/04/02 02:23:42
    janet
    +1
    I really do not go to the cinema anymore, I have Netflix and I always wait for the DVD or Blu Ray : )
  • Jimbo 2012/03/31 15:44:02
    Facepalm
    Jimbo
    +2
    Why make a sequel to a movie that sucked.
  • OneLastWord 2012/03/31 15:42:15
    Facepalm
    OneLastWord
    +1
    Naw,.... this remake is like a "Fat Book” written to make money, and usually not that good and snookers the public into seeing the movie or reading the book. It’s based on previous successes.

    I’d say less than half of them are any good.
  • RoyJLores 2012/03/31 15:34:05
    Facepalm
    RoyJLores
    +1
    The first movie wasn't that good to begin with, in fact it was and remains one of the few movies I did not like starring Arnold.
  • Bill ~PWCM~JLA 2012/03/31 15:25:53
    Fun
    Bill ~PWCM~JLA
    They have the performers.... now can they get the writers?
  • Mr.Hoodz the Truth Troll 2012/03/31 14:44:32
    Facepalm
    Mr.Hoodz the Truth Troll
    +2
    Eddy Murphy hasn't had a hit or anything worth wild seeing since The Nutty Professor.
  • Kozman Mr.Hood... 2012/03/31 18:34:32
    Kozman
    And even that sucked.
  • Mr.Hood... Kozman 2012/03/31 19:44:35
    Mr.Hoodz the Truth Troll
    Nah. I wouldn't say that
  • The Black Dagger 2012/03/31 14:21:25
    Fun
    The Black Dagger
    I think it's funny that a lot of people, like the commentators so far, face palmed the idea of the original movie "Twins" when it first came out. Then they saw it and backpedaled as fast as they could.

    I'll wait and watch the movie and make my judgement then.

    For all of his real life goof ups, I'm hoping Eddie can get his career back on track.
  • Get Bashed 2012/03/31 13:49:27
    Facepalm
    Get Bashed
    +1
    Eddie should have stuck to his Richard Pryor roots, I hate clean-cut Eddie and so do a lot of other people that I know!
  • Mz Understood 2012/03/31 04:55:28
    Facepalm
    Mz Understood
  • Steve King 2012/03/31 02:04:56
    Facepalm
    Steve King
    +1
    How do you spell "Jumping the Shark'?

    E-D-D-I-E
  • Caedus01 Sith Lord of the P... 2012/03/31 01:38:20
    Fun
    Caedus01 Sith Lord of the PHAET
    i'm rooting for Eddie to have another hit
  • vinone 2012/03/31 01:24:58
    Facepalm
    vinone
    No...
  • Gregaj7 2012/03/31 01:12:17
    Facepalm
    Gregaj7
    +4
    Hollywood running out of ideas?
  • smitty Gregaj7 2012/03/31 17:14:44
    smitty
    +3
    20 years ago.
  • freakou... smitty 2012/03/31 19:47:48
    freakoutnow... cuz mom's here
    +2
    More like 70 years ago they ran out of concept ideas. 30 years ago they ran out of fresh spins on the concept that haven't been done somewhere. 20 years ago they began running an ever increasing fresh blood of talent to rejuvenate the industry. 15 years ago they ran out fresh ways to market a movie. 10 years ago they ran out of fresh ways to make a movie. 4 years ago they ran out of the magic to make a film that isn't overshadowed by the special effects and it make decent money.
  • Gregaj7 freakou... 2012/03/31 23:18:17
    Gregaj7
    Nice break-down. :)
  • freakou... Gregaj7 2012/04/01 04:34:25
    freakoutnow... cuz mom's here
    +1
    Thank you:) The problems isn't always the movies fault either. For instance the new variations on the concepts often got stolen by television shows, books, stage plays, and even the Internet. Some creative spins on concepts still probely are out there but by the time Hollywood gets the idea it's already been used somewhere now days.
  • smitty freakou... 2012/04/02 18:14:11
    smitty
    Well said.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Entertainment

2014/12/19 21:42:58

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals