Tenacious D Concert Stabbing: Are Concert Crowds Any More Dangerous Than Other Crowds?

by Fergie Posted 2012/07/30 20:00:00

Related Topics: Music, tenacious d, Concert

188 votes
Read all 134 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	62 votes	33%
	No	126 votes	67%

A stabbing at a Tenacious D concert Sunday night in Las Vegas is the latest in a series of stabbing incidents at concerts this month. There aren't that many known details about this latest attack, but many are now questioning the safety of concert crowds. What do you think: Are crowds at concerts more dangerous than others? Or can violence happen anywhere?

Add a comment above

Sodahead User 2012/07/31 04:22:46

No

+4
It's not the crowd that is dangerous, just certain people.
>> See Replies

More polls by Fergie

Monty to merslix. 2012/07/31 12:31:30

+1
yessss!

reply
Catnip 2012/07/31 01:56:36

No

I've been to literally hundreds of concerts. And the only problem I had was with a photographer who kept blocking my view at a Rush concert. It didn't end well...for the photographer.

reply
N. Zane 2012/07/31 01:32:27

Yes

I know this from experience

reply
SoD to N. Zane 2012/07/31 01:41:53

Amen to that.

Any crowd where you have an utter dismissal of the inhibitions which are normally adhered to by the predominate majority of the population is going to be more dangerous.

reply
N. Zane to SoD 2012/07/31 02:13:32

lol yeah it was a good time

reply
Monty to SoD 2012/07/31 12:18:16

in plain mega-speak please...is this data from star trek speaking?

reply
SoD to Monty 2012/07/31 12:47:07

I'm sorry.

Can I in some way clarify my premise for you?

reply
merslix. to N. Zane 2012/07/31 02:29:19

+1
lol juggalo

reply
Constantine 2012/07/31 01:17:29
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/07/31 08:24:18

America is far deadlier

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/07/31 09:56:58

Hehe yeh... totally.

reply
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/07/31 09:59:34

I can't tell if that was sarcasm.

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/08/01 00:43:14 (edited)

Hey, you're validated to your own opinion. I'm validated to mine. Unfortunately, when the entire US is in nuclear fallout. I'll be safely tucked away in Australia with my opinion and yours will be disintegrated along with the top-half of your body.

reply
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/08/01 04:21:29

What makes you so sure of That?

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/08/01 08:26:38

I'm not. But I'm not usually wrong, and common knowledge dictates that north korea is working with china to take over. The chinese and korean are an inscrutible folk.

reply
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/08/01 08:56:44

China nd North Korea vs. America and all her allies?

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/08/01 09:07:01

Yeh. Think about it. Don't reply again until you've REALLY thought about it. (No offense, i mean just think about it please)

reply
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/08/01 09:32:12

Okay, have you seen a show called "Deadliest Warrior?"

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/08/01 09:35:26

Yeh. There's no way though that spartan could've killed that ninja! And I can't believe the viking killed that samurai*!

*I'm pretty sure on that one, don't hold me one it.

reply
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/08/01 09:37:04

Actually the Samurai killed the Viking, it was the Spartan that beat the Samurai. The Samurai would've demolished the Spartan.

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/08/01 09:41:23 (edited)

No, it was defs spartan vs. Ninja. Not Spartan vs. Samurai. And yes samurai would've annihilated the spartan.

reply
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/08/01 09:49:07

They did a special.. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=...

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/08/01 09:54:35

Oh cool! Thanx!

reply
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/08/01 09:58:46

Ur welcome, but the reason I brought Deadliest Warriors up is because they also did an episode of North Korean Special Forces vs. American Army Rangers.

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/08/01 10:01:54

Yeh I know how that went. But that alone doesn't give the US an advantage. No offense intended.

reply
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/08/01 10:05:46

But our allies and special forces think so: U.S. Army Delta Force, U.S. Marines Recon, U.S. Navy Seals, U.S. Army Green Berets, U.S. Air Force Pararescue. Plus more and our allies.

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/08/01 10:20:07

Yeh they may all exist but many are no match for what they have in store.

reply
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/08/01 10:24:45

What's in store? Nuclear war? I think we have more nukes

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/08/01 10:27:09

Yes but who's gonna win then? The answer; Nobody.

reply
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/08/01 10:28:11

We'd be weakened, not beaten.

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/08/01 10:32:26

Oh, we'd be beaten mate. Nuclear war is no Pearl harbour. It's MUCH worse.

reply
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/08/01 10:34:21

I know, but you've heard of Hiroshima, correct?

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/08/01 10:35:47

All too well. Genocide.

reply
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/08/01 10:36:58

I wouldn't call it genocide.

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/08/01 10:41:53

Mass murder seemed too well fit so thats what I went with.

reply
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/08/01 10:44:44

Yeah, but genocide is when you're trying to wipe out a race, religion, and/or ethnicity. We were only trying to wipe out the munitions factories in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/08/01 10:46:18

And what did we accomplish? The mass murder of many asian members of society. Innocent people who wouldn't have harmed anyone.

reply
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/08/01 10:48:15

It was a tough decision that had to be made, it was a decision that won the war.

reply
Constan... to ☣Master... 2012/08/01 10:55:04
☣Master... to Constan... 2012/08/01 10:59:39

What other ways could have been made to win the war?

reply