They shouldn't photograph her unless she wants them to.
She has the same right to privacy as the rest of us, the paparazzi shouldn't invade it.
Should the Paps Be Allowed to Capture Kate Middleton’s Baby Bump?
SodaHead Celebs
2013/02/05 15:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
184 votes
|
|
43% | |||
|
247 votes
|
|
57% | |||
Royal Baby Bump Watch 2013 continues as Kate Middleton made a rare public appearance this weekend, one of the few since announcing her pregnancy in November. Much to the chagrin of the paparazzi, the Duchess of Cambridge has been keeping a pretty low profile in recent months. So now, more than ever, the competition is fierce to become the photograph to get the first shot of the baby bump.
It’s impossible to know whether Kate is staying out of the public eye because of the pregnancy and her acute morning sickness or because of the recent prank gone bad. A local DJ’s call led to the suicide of a nurse where Kate was getting treatment back in December, putting a damper on the exciting news of the royal baby. So you would think the press would learn their lesson and lay off the obsessive behavior. But no such luck.
Kate came out of hiding this weekend in London as she went on a shopping trip to several stores including Boots, Gap, London's JoJo Maman Bébé, Sweaty Betty and Starbucks.
But the big news is not where she went, but what she was wearing. She was seen wearing a large black-and-white plaid shawl by Zara. The outer garment mostly concealed her stomach, hindering all attempts to capture the coveted royal baby bump.
Still, the Duchess was looking very pregnant and the paps are touting the images as the first shot of the "baby bump." So does Kate need to go into hiding for the next six months or can the photogs give her some space? What do you think? Should the paps be allowed to capture Kate’s baby bump?
It’s impossible to know whether Kate is staying out of the public eye because of the pregnancy and her acute morning sickness or because of the recent prank gone bad. A local DJ’s call led to the suicide of a nurse where Kate was getting treatment back in December, putting a damper on the exciting news of the royal baby. So you would think the press would learn their lesson and lay off the obsessive behavior. But no such luck.
Kate came out of hiding this weekend in London as she went on a shopping trip to several stores including Boots, Gap, London's JoJo Maman Bébé, Sweaty Betty and Starbucks.
But the big news is not where she went, but what she was wearing. She was seen wearing a large black-and-white plaid shawl by Zara. The outer garment mostly concealed her stomach, hindering all attempts to capture the coveted royal baby bump.
Still, the Duchess was looking very pregnant and the paps are touting the images as the first shot of the "baby bump." So does Kate need to go into hiding for the next six months or can the photogs give her some space? What do you think? Should the paps be allowed to capture Kate’s baby bump?
Top Opinion
-
Willski 2013/02/05 15:10:01
the royals, but to any and all celebrities. That paparazzi needs to either
rein it in, or Government may either do that for them, or outlaw them entirely.
The first ammendment is not a license for the paparazzi to haize celebrities.
If there is no Crime where the public interest prevails then everyone should bugger off.
paparazzi should be allowedd to photographh pictures of Kate's tummy. I said she deserved her privacy.,Pregnancy is private and beautiful. Let her have her right as the rest of us do to her privacy when it comes to having our pictures taken
You are the one who did not answer the question correctly and brough aboration into it. Go back to school!!
You not only are a pig now your also a Jack Ass!!
I am blocking you because of the language you use to describe body parts. It just showed me how uneducated your are.
.