Should the Knicks Match $25 Million Offer to Keep Jeremy Lin in New York?
Chris D
2012/07/16 20:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
126 votes
|
|
47% | |||
|
143 votes
|
|
53% | |||
The Knicks just don't seem to know a good thing when they see it. Jeremy Lin, the phenomenally "linsane" Cinderella story that had all of New York -- and China -- enthralled with the New York Knicks, is one day away from being let go. It sure seems like "linsanity" for the Knicks to pick up older players like Jason Kidd while letting a young, lightning-rod player like Jeremy Lin get dealt to Houston with no resistance. What gives, New York?
MSN.FOXSPORTS.COM reports:
MSN.FOXSPORTS.COM reports:
Jeremy Lin offer sheet reportedly wont be matched by New York Knicks, which would make him Houston Rocket.
Read More: http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/jeremy-lin-new-...
Top Opinion
-
This is W³ 2012/07/17 13:09:42Yes, the Knicks should keep Jeremy Lin.
+4I am still wrappping my head around the fact that the Knicks signed 39-year old Jason Kidd to a 3-year contract worth $9 million. That's 9 mil in less wiggle room to work with under the salary cap. Kidd is a dinosaur when it comes to the NBA. The 23-year old Lin, on the other hand, is a valuable asset to the team. The Knicks have their priorities screwed up.
More polls by Chris D
Sort By
- the judgebigdogeagle 2012/07/17 03:15:02No, the Knicks should let him go.
+1Sink or Swim. Pay up or let him come back to Houston. I am partial to the last part.reply - concerned dude 2012/07/17 01:59:57Yes, the Knicks should keep Jeremy Lin.+1but the Nicks are the nicks.reply
- wamcalif 2012/07/17 01:54:32No, the Knicks should let him go.+1Lin needs to be with a young, running team. Omare and Stoudemire can't match Lin's pace.reply
- gone i guess 2012/07/17 00:59:45No, the Knicks should let him go.+1too much moenyreply
- joe mauro 2012/07/17 00:45:53Yes, the Knicks should keep Jeremy Lin.+1and they willreply
- NYYankees 2012/07/16 23:56:33No, the Knicks should let him go.+2he did a great job in new york but who knows if his linsanity was just a fluke or not. doesnt anyone remember that this was a guy who nobody wanted at one time?reply
- metspatriotshd69 2012/07/16 23:38:33No, the Knicks should let him go.+3I think he was just a flash in the NY area pants... Good bye....reply
- MarinerFH 2012/07/16 23:34:37No, the Knicks should let him go.+1To keep Lin, the Knicks would have to pay heavily under the new CBA. It would be too destructive overall.reply
- gregaj7 2012/07/16 22:41:40No, the Knicks should let him go.+1The Knickerbockers have been a degrading franchise since Patrick Ewing retired. They don't deserve a player like Jeremy Lin.reply
- JS 2012/07/16 22:27:51No, the Knicks should let him go.+2I absolutely love Jeremy Lin and would love to see him play on my favorite team for years to come, but I just don't think it is practical for the Knicks to keep him. He doesn't have enough history playing in the NBA to back up the Knicks paying him this much money. It'll be extremely hard to see him leave though...reply
- Joey 2012/07/16 21:59:10No, the Knicks should let him go.+2His a good player ..but he is not worth that much money. Besides he quit on New York. He was cleared to play but he made the choice to set out.. If anyone else did that people would be blasting that player for being selfish.reply
- Fef 2012/07/16 20:34:55Yes, the Knicks should keep Jeremy Lin.+3why get rid of a fan favorite? Lin has youth, tech-savvy audience, and mad skillz, y'all!reply
«« First « Prev
1
2
