Should the court have given Britney Spears back her visitation rights?

Question Entertainment

Should the court have given Britney Spears back her visitation rights?

by OK Magazine Posted October 04, 2007 18:48:41

77 answers
Read all 71 comments
+15 raves

Answers
Results
Recommend This

Top Comment

+6 raves Bill October 04, 2007 19:13:32

Answered: You bet!
I think she should at least get supervised visitation with her children.
View thread

Sort By

Most Raves
Least Raves
Oldest
Newest

text size

Comments

+2 raves
Amanda October 05, 2007 00:13:52

Answered: Hell to the no!
britney does not deserve visitation rights at all. she partys 2 much and she is a drunk and she drove with one on her lap be4
+1 raves
Alicia October 05, 2007 00:10:00

Answered: You bet!
they're her children.. even if it has to be supervised..that's better than not letting her see them at all..
+1 raves
RIC HARD October 04, 2007 22:25:59 (edited)

Answered: Hell to the no!
Supervised of course. Nobody other than child molesters should be denied to see their childern from time to time.
Hola October 04, 2007 21:54:28

Answered: You bet!
That is the least they could do!
+2 raves
AMarie October 04, 2007 21:00:32

Answered: Hell to the no!
not yet...
+2 raves
Smokey October 04, 2007 20:09:21

Answered: You bet!
Yes, after she goes through extensive therapy and drug rehab.
+3 raves
B4Real2Me October 04, 2007 19:44:42

Answered: Hell to the no!
Not until she gets some serious PROFESSIONAL help!!!
+1 raves
gerards_my_bitch October 04, 2007 19:43:05

Answered: Who cares?
i honestly dont care

THIS WOMAN IS A WASTE OF THE EARTH

her kids are gone turn out like her

whichever way you look at it

it doesnt matter
iM iN L... to gerards... October 06, 2007 20:01:08

Yes... i agree.. she totally has gone wack ain't i right? i mean, you see her constantly in magazinez, and people are feelin soo bad for her kids cuz they know brittney is really irresponsible and i swear to god that she really needs help, she has no control over herself and her kidz, and i'd hate to see her kids grow up and realize that their mother isn't there for them. :(
+1 raves
ThatGirl October 04, 2007 19:42:54 (edited)

Answered: Who cares?
I really don't care, but she shouldn't be an influence on any child. She definitely needs to stay out of showbiz until she's a more respectable person. Not only for the sake of her own children, but what about the millions of children that see her random acts of stupidity everyday and look up to her? These Hollywood starlets are ruining the minds of our youth.
iM iN L... to ThatGirl October 06, 2007 20:03:29

all i can say about that is that your sooo right! thank you gurl, you might as well just preach that to the rest of the crowd hunny... good thinkin!
we rest our case right?!

shannah.
+1 raves
Donna October 04, 2007 19:28:34

Answered: Hell to the no!
she doesn't deserve to have her children... they need loving parents who put the kids before anything else (especially things like drinking and drugs!). There's no way the Spears household would benefit those poor children
+1 raves
Jesse James October 04, 2007 19:26:43

Answered: Hell to the no!
not until she gets her life together and starts wearing underwear
Marko October 04, 2007 19:26:38

Answered: Hell to the no!
She has lost it. But to be honest still wouldnt mind giving her a hmmmm lesson in child care.
+1 raves
Gramma Lil October 04, 2007 19:21:40

Answered: Who cares?
She didn't show up in court. She ran all over town looking like she didn't give a shoot, laughing for all the cameras to see. And she gave the kid's to K-Fed two days before she had to....to me that says "Great I'm glad they are off my hands now"! If she doesn't give a shoot, then why should the rest of us.
+1 raves
Jessica to Gramma Lil October 05, 2007 02:39:12

Yeah that is true I don't think she knows what to do right now she doesn't want to cry and addmit she has a prob. she wants to keep actin like everythings ok. But its not
+1 raves
Gramma Lil to Jessica October 05, 2007 02:45:28

And it's not going to be til she gets her act together. She used to say that she wanted to be a role model for girls to look up to her. She needs to be a role model for her sons.
Stacy October 04, 2007 19:19:18 (edited)

Answered: You bet!
Britney just recieves a lot of negative publicity because she's always in the limelight!! Im sure shes actually a good mom!!! Plus, theres no way that K-Fed can be a good dad!

Tom October 04, 2007 19:19:13 (edited)

Answered: You bet!

I don't know about an enthusiastic 'You Bet' but I agree with Bills sentiment below.


                            |

                            |

                            |

                    \       |       /

                      \     |     / 

                        \   |   /

                         \    /  

                           \/

+2 raves
John October 04, 2007 19:16:27

Answered: Hell to the no!
Not without supervision at least anyway..She needs to put her life on track first..and then the court can see if it's in the kids' best interests..
+6 raves
Bill October 04, 2007 19:13:32

Answered: You bet!
I think she should at least get supervised visitation with her children.
Jessica to Bill October 05, 2007 02:30:17

She got that!
+3 raves
Candy October 04, 2007 19:12:27

Answered: Hell to the no!
She hasn't done any of the things the judge required her to do to get the kids back. She has to make changes and then maybe, she should be allowed to see her kids un-supervised. But I don't think it's healthy for a drug addict to raise 2 children.
+1 raves
Andrew October 04, 2007 19:10:35

Answered: Hell to the no!
no way... Britney is crazy as shite, irresponsible, and has done absolutely nothing to prove that she can handle having kids--hell, she can't even handle her own life.
La Saria October 04, 2007 19:10:32

Answered: You bet!
But I'm a REALLY big fan of child abuse, so I might be kinda biased.
Fef to La Saria October 04, 2007 19:28:00

uhm... with your background I read on your profile and other polls, I can see your sarcasm. but some here may not see that in your comment.
La Saria to Fef October 08, 2007 18:05:03

sux for them.
+1 raves
Corey October 04, 2007 19:09:19

Answered: Hell to the no!
She didn't even show up to court yesterday. She'd rather go to Starbucks and drive aimlessly around the city waiting for people to photograph her. She's vile and doesn't even want the kids.
+2 raves
Cassie October 04, 2007 19:07:26

Answered: Hell to the no!
As Whitney would say, AW HELL TO THE NAWWWW
+2 raves
Assassin Felinious October 04, 2007 19:06:21

Answered: Hell to the no!
Custody isn't about BRITNEY; it's about the kids and what is in their best interests. Right now Britney isn't in their best interest. However, neither is KFed. I think they should've been placed in foster care UFN (until further notice.)
+1 raves
panda. October 04, 2007 18:55:44

Answered: Hell to the no!
Those poor kids are in danger being with her. I wouldn't be surprice to hear she fed those kids boose for brkfast.