Should the Beach Boys Get Royalties for Katy Perry's 'California Gurls' Song?
SodaHead Music
2010/08/06 12:10:59
|
|
|||||
|
58 votes
|
|
36% | |||
|
103 votes
|
|
64% | |||
After posing topless for Rolling Stone this week, some people have accused Katy Perry of being a bimbo. Now she’s being called a thief.
What a week!
And who’s calling our very own California Gurl a robber? None other than the original creators of the first “California Girls,” Mike Love and Brian Wilson of the Beach Boys. A music industry source spoke to the New York Post’s Page Six, stating “Rondor Music has sent a letter to Capitol on behalf of Mike Love and Brian Wilson, saying Katy has cribbed one of the most famous lyrics in history, so Love and Wilson should be entitled to a writing credit and a portion of the royalties.”
The line in question is “I wish they all could be California Girls,” which was sung by the Beach Boys in the original version, and spoken by Snoop at the end of Perry’s smash hit, summertime single, which has sold over three million copies and has become the pop music anthem of the summer.
Perry once described the song as a tribute to the Beach Boys original. Apparently, since her “tribute” has sold so many copies, the Beach Boys want in on the action. You better strap on your whipped-cream-shooting bra Katy, cuz this looks like war! Should the Beach Boys Get Royalties for Katy Perry's 'California Gurls' Song?
What a week!
And who’s calling our very own California Gurl a robber? None other than the original creators of the first “California Girls,” Mike Love and Brian Wilson of the Beach Boys. A music industry source spoke to the New York Post’s Page Six, stating “Rondor Music has sent a letter to Capitol on behalf of Mike Love and Brian Wilson, saying Katy has cribbed one of the most famous lyrics in history, so Love and Wilson should be entitled to a writing credit and a portion of the royalties.”
The line in question is “I wish they all could be California Girls,” which was sung by the Beach Boys in the original version, and spoken by Snoop at the end of Perry’s smash hit, summertime single, which has sold over three million copies and has become the pop music anthem of the summer.
Perry once described the song as a tribute to the Beach Boys original. Apparently, since her “tribute” has sold so many copies, the Beach Boys want in on the action. You better strap on your whipped-cream-shooting bra Katy, cuz this looks like war! Should the Beach Boys Get Royalties for Katy Perry's 'California Gurls' Song?
Read More: http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/beach_boys_vs_katy...






















I demand the Beach Boys (whom I happen to love otherwise) apologize to Mr. Dogg immediately, because, if anyone should know a thing or two about stealing music it would be the Beach Boys. They need to apologize to Charles Manson while they're at it:
Her record execs just might consider having a "smash hit, summertime single" from someone who has substantial musical talent.
Need I say more?
Using your own logic, I can steal your personal information like drivers license, social security number, and anything that has to do with your identity so long as I change a letter or two in there someplace. I can also take your car and drive it as long as I repaint it or hang up a different air freshener from the rear view mirror...it's not your car anymore, it's a different color and the air freshener is different.
You may be the dumbest person on sodahead.
I know it seems minor but it only takes a couple of words. She will pay.
And you're absolutely right in that two songs can have the same title and be totally different songs with no copyright infringement EXCEPT that in this case the used the "hood" line from the original song at the end AND Katy Herself said this song is a tribute to the Beach Boys.
Yeah, she didn't get any inspiration from the original song at all - all merely an accident. Is that what you would have us believe. Well, Katy doesn't believe that and the people who own the song don't either.
Lastly, Authors DO sue each other over use of the same title. Do you really think for a moment that If I wrote a book and called it "Harry Potter and the Sorcerers Stone" that JK Rowling (a mega billionaire) would have a team of Lawyers on me in a heartbeat? She and the companies she's in business with sued every author who was writing books about decoding the magic and words written about in the books.
Music, Books, Art, photographs are all protected by copyright laws and are the authors, originators intellectual property. Using all or any part is illegal, plain and simple.
Besides, this isn't about who's better than whom. It's about who's stealing from whom. I think you'll find Katy in the latter and not the former.
P.S. Katy Perry is a hack - she'll be gone from your memory in 1 year and you will have moved on to the next ho-bag.