Should Players Be Punished for BountyGate?
SodaHead Sports
2012/04/25 20:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
47 votes
|
|
71% | |||
|
19 votes
|
|
29% | |||
If the New Orleans Saints think the BountyGate story is going to go away anytime soon, then the franchise has been terribly misinformed. As we've covered here on SodaHead Sports, the NFL has come hard on the Saints', a team that instilled a bounty system for a number of years, including as recently as last postseason.
We've already mentioned that head coach Sean Payton is suspended for a season, former defensive coordinator Gregg Williams is banned indefinitely, the Saints were fined half a million dollars, and general manager Mickey Loomis is out for eight games (although it could be out for much longer with a new spying scandal coming to light.) And as if that isn't all enough, there's more.
NFL commissioner Roger Goodell isn't done yet with BountyGate -- not by a long shot. Goodell tells the media that he will indeed go after players he believes were not only part of BountyGate -- but willingly participated in taking out (or trying to take out) opposing players for money. It's bad enough the franchise turned a blind eye for years, even after the NFL warned the front office.
Now it looks like any defensive player during that time is subject to, at the very least, strict questioning on what happened with BountyGate. The NFL's investigation has been thorough, but we wonder if any players might unfortunately end up guilty strictly by association.

We've already mentioned that head coach Sean Payton is suspended for a season, former defensive coordinator Gregg Williams is banned indefinitely, the Saints were fined half a million dollars, and general manager Mickey Loomis is out for eight games (although it could be out for much longer with a new spying scandal coming to light.) And as if that isn't all enough, there's more.
NFL commissioner Roger Goodell isn't done yet with BountyGate -- not by a long shot. Goodell tells the media that he will indeed go after players he believes were not only part of BountyGate -- but willingly participated in taking out (or trying to take out) opposing players for money. It's bad enough the franchise turned a blind eye for years, even after the NFL warned the front office.
Now it looks like any defensive player during that time is subject to, at the very least, strict questioning on what happened with BountyGate. The NFL's investigation has been thorough, but we wonder if any players might unfortunately end up guilty strictly by association.

Top Opinion
-
Shadow13 2012/04/25 20:32:35Yes+3They were complicit in it and took part in it. They knew their actions would cause injury and knew that by doing what they did they'd also receive a bounty, hence is why it was a bounty system. Their callous disregard for their fellow players should be punished as well.






















The same is for football. YOU want to see the big names on the field. Not on the sidelines.
According to Businessweek in 2011 the average salary for a nfl player was 1.9 mill. The median was 770k. That is not even a player salary. Heck the minimum for 2012 is 375k.
That's drew brees beer money on a friday night.
"It's bad enough the franchise turned a blind eye for years, even after the NFL warned the front office. While much more serious.. Penn State turned a blind eye too. Look what happened to all of them. They cleaned house.
If they did target him the did a crappy job.
edited.. I did not play at the pro level.
Was this a bounty? I mean it was extra violent and meant to harm.... How are they going to know? They can't.
There have been alot more injuries though. Evident by the NFL pussifying football to a degree. Well, I guess we know why now.
When I played we played hard. Not with the intent of ruining someones career.