Should Jerry Sandusky join the cast of 'Glee'?

Nope. Glee doesn't need Sandusky, it's doing fine without him.

But since he's such a liar, maybe he should join the group at FOX.

In the near future when the scum that runs the entertainment industry decides on a NAMBLA situation "comedy",Jerry would be perfect for the role in a "first time" episode. Ahhhhhhhhh, the sense of liberation in the air, a young defenseless child, a predatory rapist.

Sandusky should rot in hell. What Glee has to do with this I have no utter effing idea.

Did you read the question?

Yes. The first article was about Sandusky being a pedophile. Afterwards there was a comment on how Glee promotes homosexuality. Has Glee said that it will feature Sandusky? nope. nada. Has Sandusky mentioned Glee in any interview? nope. nada. So the question is: what does a pedophile have to do with a TV show that has not mentioned him once.

No you did not read clearly.

Glee promotes sex with teen boys.

Sandusky loves sex with teen boys.

The TV show promotes pedophilia...or did you not read the part about the teen boys having sex?

Here's the difference:

Sandusky is a pedophile who rapes young boys. He should be imprisoned.

Glee shows the consensual and willing sex between 2 boys in love.

If we go with your logic then every heterosexual rapist should star in every TV series and movie that shows a consensual and willing relationship between heterosexuals. Sound fair? Please give a LOGICAL conclusion as to why Sandusky is in any way connected with Glee.

You are a moron.

Boys cannot consent and the actors are adults. Remember, the boys CONSENTED to have sex with Sandusky by your logic as none of them called the cops.

Yes every rapist should be a star on Glee. It's a perverse show watched by the morally confused.

I just explained Sandusky likes to pound boy ass and so does Glee.

If you can't see that then I suggest you not vote because you are not qualified.

I am trying to be REASONABLE, something you seem to be incapable of.

Did I say anything about the boys consenting? nope. I would love for you to give the quote in which I said that.

The actors in Glee ARE adults, and their relationship is depicted as consensual. The relationship in GLEE is consensual.

In Sandusky's case the boys were ABUSED. There is a big difference.

Also in your logic you say that Glee has gay relationships = rapist. I see no connection. Why? Because every heterosexual rapist should go to EVERY SINGLE TV series that has a girl and boy together. Where did I say that rapists = Glee? I said that if gay rapists= all shows with gay people then hetero rapists = all shows with straight people. Get the drift?

I ask you to use reasonable arguments that dont involve pointless conjectures.

Now just to recap just in case you did not understand a thing of what I said.

Gay relationships do NOT equal rape.

a gay rapist does NOT equal all gay relationships.

If a gay rapist = TV show with gays.
Then a straight rapist = TV show with straight people.

Thus there is no correlation between a child sex abuser and a TV show that just so happens to have gays in it.

Did you get that?

Nope, they are boys.

Glee promotes gay sex with boys.

Did you get that?

Yes Glee is pro-gay we get that. It is not pro-rape or pro-pedo. That is the damn point.

Do I have to repeat myself? AGAIN?

gay rape and gay abuse does not equal a TV show with gays
straight rape and straight abuse similarly do not equal TV shows with straight people.

Therefore no connection.

In the same way a rapist who is STRAIGHT will not be featured in TV shows such as Friends, Heroes, One Tree Hill, Lost or whatever just because they have Straight sex.

Straight people rape is not equal to straight people sex.
Gay rape is not equal to gay sex.

Or did you not get that rape and sex are 2 different things?

Pro gay sex with boys.

You cannot run away from that fact.

Sandusky is pro gay sex with boys.

You cannot run away from that fact.

Accept it.

Yes, we get it.

You also can't run away from the fact that rape is not sex.

Saundusky raped. No one in Glee did.

You cannot run away from that fact.

Accept it.

Unless of course you believe that rape and sex are the exact same thing?

sex with kids is rape...keep tap dancing

Yes it is. But I find it sorta weird that if sex with kids is rape, then why aren't you commenting on say the sex between Rachel and Finn? and Puck and Quinn? And Finn and Quinn?

They are after all the same age as Blaine and Kurt. Except they're all straight.

My point is that gay sex between people who consent is different from rape. Therefore there is no correlation.

You keep tap dancing, considering how illogical your arguement still is.

Get it through your head. Rape is different from sex with consent.

Who are those losers?

I am opposed to sex with children.

I commented on what was relevant.

I didn't comment on the French revolution but I oppose it too.

You mentioned the Finn and Rachel virginity issue, you just decided to focus iin the gays. Also have you seen other movies and shows that depicts teen sex? There's quite a lot of them, why Glee?

I dont care whether you're homophobic or not, this is the wrong forum for that. I just wish that instead of randomly pointing to a TV show that just so happens to have gays and linking it to a RAPE case you could have commented on JUST the rape case. or even JUST the fact that Glee featured gays.

I stand by my stance that there is no connection between Glee and the Sandusky case. Nothing a reasonable person would see anyway.

But hey, this is wasting my time as it seems like it doesn't seem to get through your skull.

And seeing as your argument consists of gay rape and gay sex amounts to the same thing since they're still gays having sex well...

Lets just say I don't think you're being very rational about the issue.

but hey, to each his own.

Your are wordy.

I was clear. You refuse to see it.

That's your problem not mine.

Glee promotes gay sex with boys and I bet it's on Sandusky's list of favorite TV shows seeing how he likes to have sex with boys.

And apparently it's also on YOUR list of favorite shows,too. Because you are obviously fantasizing about the man on man sex, because it doesn't exist on the show.

i know this is an old thread - but glee has never even suggested a sexual relationship between teenaged males.
It does show emotional relationships, but not sex.

On the other hand, sex is rampant between the boys and girls, though. Teen pregnancy, revenge sex, and a younger guy who seduces older women.

You're wasting time arguing with anyone who calls himself a fan of OReilly -- he isn't interested in anything resembling the truth.

I think you're dead wrong on that bucko -- I mean, "FanOreilly".

NONE of the "teen boys" on glee has had sex with anyone but teen girls. C'mon, Oreilly -- you should know this. It's on FOX.

Err....Actually they did.

Trust me. I'm a gleek. Blaine and Kurt were implied to have sex on the same episode as Rachel and Finn.

oh he'll be cast in the prison version of glee, where he is hands on the wall in the shower with his new wife pumpin' from behind.

I love the way you used the word, "Leftists." :)

Why not?? If the shoe fits......!! Might want to get a spot for the rest of the 'coverup crew' too! They can all take their respective positions as principal, head coad, assistant coach 'shower coach', etc. Sorry, I tried to watch the show once, but could not find it entertaining. Just not my style.

I have a feeling old Jerry's gonna get a taste of his medicine when he get to prison. Watch the showers Jerry

Though I do hate it when an old man goes to prison.

I do not want to stereotype, but coaches are among the most common professions that have been convicted of sexual abuses. I don't think coaches are by default perverts, but it is easy to see why a pervert would be drawn to coaching or a perverted coach would be vulnerable to temptation: they have easy access to adolescents (as do teachers) and have access to them when they are changing and showering.

I think it should be required that when coaches are present in changing rooms and shower rooms, there must be at least two coaches there, so that one can make sure the other behaves. Catholic dioceses currently require any school chaperones for instance to enter bathrooms where children are two at a time (afterall chaperones must make sure children behave while in the bathroom, and if on a trip the chaperone should defend them from strangers) so that no one chaperone gets unmonitored access to the children (I think they also require two chaperones per car when driving the children around on field trips).

Hanging is too good for him. Burning is too good for him. This predatory, butt pirate, knob gobbler, of pre-pubescent boys should be torn up into little itsy bitsy pieces and buried alive.

Jerry going to find out how they foundle men in prison. NOT GOOD!

He's allready a sick degenerate so he should fit right in.

No. And please say it ain't so Joe. How disappointing Joe din't take a proactive stance and turn him in to a higher authority. Football wins and innocent kids lose. Totally sad that a mere game wins over kids lives.

For the rest of his miserable life.

You have got to be kidding me. Lets hope you are.

Well he could always see if there is an opening on Glee when he gets out of jail.

I believe there is a special place in hell for those that harm children, the disabled or others unable to protect themselves.

I do take issue with your combining/confusing homosexuality and pedophilia. I have never seen "Glee", but the characters you pictured are both gay high school students. Homosexuals, but not pedophiles. Sandusky is accused of having sex with underage boys. If true, he would be both homosexual and a pedophile. If Sandusky was accused of the same acts with underage girls, it would be no less vile and despicable. If that were the case, he would still be a pedophile, but not homosexual.

I find nothing funny or amusing about child molestation.

Only if there's a glee team in prison.

Stupid question, dead men can't act.

Yes, a NAMBLA butt humper would be a great addition to this cess pool you call a show!

Once again - incomplete choices - he should become a priest so his activities wouldn't stand out so much.