Quantcast

PUBLIC OPINION > Kristen Stewart Is the Most Overpaid Actress

SodaHead Celebs 2012/06/21 16:00:00
Starring in the "Twilight" series has been both a blessing and a curse for Kristen Stewart. On the negative side, the series has plenty of critics and the paparazzi have been less than kind. On the positive side, she's friggin' loaded. In fact, at 22 years old she's the highest-paid actress in Hollywood. According to Forbes, she earned $34.5 million in the last year. We listed the seven highest-paid actresses and asked the public to pick the most overpaid.

kristen stewart

Kristen Stewart

Just as you might expect, Kristen Stewart was voted the most overpaid actress by far. Not only is she the highest-paid, but the majority of her income is from "Twilight." The series sells, but a lot of people question Stephanie Meyer's achievements, as well as Stewart's acting ability. Her acting in the first movie was the butt of every joke for a while. To be fair, Jodie Foster thinks she's great...

Sarah Jessica Parker

Stewart was so far ahead of (behind?) the competition that the rest of the choices were all within 12% of each other. But with that in mind, Sarah Jessica Parker took second-place. This year, Parker's income came from poorly received romcoms, "I Don't Know How She Does It" and "New Year's Eve." Men were especially hostile toward her paycheck.

Cameron Diaz

Cameron Diaz was the first actress on this list that wasn't extremely predictable, and the first one who wasn't especially affected by any one demographic. There was a time Diaz might have received fewer votes, in the days of "Being John Malkovich," "Shrek," and "Vanilla Sky." But her most recent films -- "Bad Teacher" and "What to Expect When You're Expecting" -- are nothing to write home to.

If you'd like to vote on this question, dig deeper into the demographics, or engage in existing discussion about the topic, visit our poll about overpaid actresses. We'd love to hear from you!
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • SavageS0ul 2012/06/21 20:38:45
    SavageS0ul
    +5
    Sarah Jessica Parker is the most overpaid in this list, hands down. Not that it matters much. I see this as light fun, but some ppl here are going to take this extremely serious. The question that I would find more crucial is, "What are they doing with their money?". Yea, it's their money, but I'm 1/2 afraid I would vomit & bash my own head in if I found out what any of them did with most of their money. >_<

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Yuki ~ ♦Lion King of PHÆT♦ 2012/06/22 02:17:47 (edited)
    Yuki ~ ♦Lion King of PHÆT♦
    +4
    I don't know why everyone's bashing Stewart's acting.

    Bella Swann was a flat character. There wasn't much she, as an actor, could do to improve it. And she was being paid to be the character, not to take it and run away with it. It's not like Johnny Depp and Pirates of the Caribbean, where he was given a fresh character and room to add his own (experienced) touch to it. Stewart was given a character that already had a flat canon depiction, and the movie dialogue was terrible.

    Under the circumstances, I think Stewart did a pretty good job at acting. I'm an actress, and I would have probably done it similarly. There was just no wiggle room for her to put her own touch on the character. Bella was supposed to be clumsy, awkward, half-mute, dull, and give the appearance of being a slow-witted woman with a pretty face. There's not much good acting you can put in a character like that to begin with, in a movie.

    Now that I've finished with that, I have to say that Twilight is the worst piece of crap I've read since... well, since ever. I've never read anything half as bad as this that was professionally published, and I can't say I've even read very many fanfictions that were on par with this level of atrocity. It's a bad story with bad directing and bad dialogue, so it's not a good place to judge an actor.
  • KATniss Yuki ~ ... 2012/06/22 10:13:03
    KATniss
    +1
    i so agree with you!! well said!
  • aicha.b... Yuki ~ ... 2012/06/24 06:05:48
    aicha.bah.334
    I like your way of thinking. I liked the Twilight series though. And I love Kristen Stewart. But no story is badly written. A story can only be what the author wants it to be. Stephanie Meyer had an idea, and she wrote it down because she wanted it read; and millions across the globe loved it. I think that's an achievement a lot of people cannot boast about.

    An author cannot please everyone, because it is in the human nature to criticise for one and two, not everyone likes a particular author's style of writing. Even if a writer only gets one fan, she's happy, because most novelists write because they feel that they have a wonderful idea that they would like to share with the world. If one person likes it, its great; if millions across the globe love it, then the author feels that they did a marvellous job. Those who don't like the story have the right not to. But just because they don't like it does not mean that the novel is not well written or is a boring story; it just is not their type of book.

    Kristen is lucky to be earning what she's earning. I can promise that people wouldn't be complaining if they were the ones in her place, receiving the millions.
  • Mrs.Lautner <3 2012/06/22 01:21:57
    Mrs.Lautner <3
    +1
    What sense does that make to make Kristin Stewart the most overpaid actress? She has absolutley no talent. I have more talent in my left toe than she does in her whole lifetime. But if hollywood critics only like women that show little-to-no facial experssion and poor acting skills overall then Kristin is the one.
  • Dee Mrs.Lau... 2012/06/22 04:34:55
    Dee
    +1
    Nah, Hollywood likes those that someone backs up ^^ So many talented ppl never got a chance..
  • Mrs.Lau... Dee 2012/06/22 04:59:46
    Mrs.Lautner <3
    Lolz so right. People like me! I want to be a actress.
  • spencerc143 2012/06/22 01:16:13
    spencerc143
    +1
    Maybe. I dont know how much shes paid...but i think shes a good actress.
  • Heisenberg 2012/06/22 00:46:00
    Heisenberg
    +1
    Yes, she's way overpaid which is an understatement.
  • metasebia 2012/06/21 23:11:34
    metasebia
    Why not she do good art work
  • Devasis... metasebia 2012/06/22 03:07:33
    Devasish Dewan
    If every one desire for sure Director and Producer will work out to give her chance
  • Sarah <333 2012/06/21 22:53:19
    Sarah <333
    +1
    Kristen Stewart that's for sure <333333
    i love her sooo much.......
  • T A 2012/06/21 20:56:44
    T A
    +3
    No such thing as overpaid in the free market. They are paid by butts in seats. You don't like her work or her pay, keep your butt out of cinemas featuring her films.
  • Christine T A 2012/07/20 16:27:56
    Christine
    +1
    I never go to the theater anymore. I get my movies from the Pirate Bay!!
  • T A Christine 2012/07/20 17:47:42 (edited)
    T A
    That's another way to avoid paying her. However, if you like her work she's less likely to get more if people keep downloading them. Well, not her as her movies grossed over $1B.

    Actually, I think the studios would just figure out other ways to monetize films but right now they seem addicted to using violence and threats of violence - even though it's not working - which is why I say addicted.
  • SavageS0ul 2012/06/21 20:38:45
    SavageS0ul
    +5
    Sarah Jessica Parker is the most overpaid in this list, hands down. Not that it matters much. I see this as light fun, but some ppl here are going to take this extremely serious. The question that I would find more crucial is, "What are they doing with their money?". Yea, it's their money, but I'm 1/2 afraid I would vomit & bash my own head in if I found out what any of them did with most of their money. >_<
  • kyle 2012/06/21 20:38:17
    kyle
    +2
    i find it rediculas when you think about she is not that great of an actress i know alot of other actresses that is better then she is just saying the truth
  • Marie 2012/06/21 20:36:22
    Marie
    +2
    I like her but don't they all get way to much money?
  • T A Marie 2012/06/21 20:57:24
    T A
    nope. they get a portion of total receipts.
  • MASOUDLETON 2012/06/21 20:30:07
    MASOUDLETON
    she change her life ? this is life you be live or not................
  • Freeranger 2012/06/21 20:14:52
    Freeranger
    +1
    And here in lies the lesson in hiring agents. A vast difference exists between hype and talent. I've always been a huge believer in the British film idea in which, one apprentices and learns the craft of acting in long standing and established schools. A chasm exists between those actors who've attended them, vs. waiting to be "discovered" in Hollyweird waiting tables.
    But.....whatever. Not my struggle. Hooray for British instruction.
  • jabo Freeranger 2012/06/22 11:29:28
    jabo
    You are 100% on target. I only watch foreign film anymore. While Hollywood has people like Damon and Pitt, the UK has professional actors like Liam Neeson and Colin Firth.
  • mick 2012/06/21 19:53:24
    mick
    +4
    I'm not a huge twilight fan (or kristen, for that matter) but the numbers don't lie. she may be average in her acting abilities but we all know thats irrelavent. simply put, she stepped in a big pile of money when she was casted for twilight. get over it!
  • Jada_Ringo 2012/06/21 18:56:47
    Jada_Ringo
    I like her, SJP on the other hand...
  • Aingean 2012/06/21 18:43:28
    Aingean
    I liked her in The Messengers, but all her other movies that I have seen I haven't liked.
  • Sprout 2012/06/21 18:38:13 (edited)
    Sprout
    +1
    It's NOT her first movie....boy is this country JUDGEMENTAL...LOVE LOVE LOVE HER!!!!!!!!
  • Riobhca 2012/06/21 18:16:37
    Riobhca
    +1
    Actually ALL of them are very seriously overpaid. That our society values their idiocy more than people who really do something worthwhile is a sad thing.
  • T A Riobhca 2012/06/21 21:01:43
    T A
    If you can competently teach in a classroom millions of people for $10.00, you'll have the pay parity you're looking for. Actors and actresses cost far less per person than teachers and doctors. They are more efficient at distribution and thus reap the rewards.
  • Christine Riobhca 2012/06/21 21:02:48 (edited)
    Christine
    +1
    I absolutely agree! It's a sad state of affairs when these entertainers (who aren't even that good at what they do) get paid millions when teachers and scientists get crap money and work 10x as hard. Maybe people should stop wasting money on stupid movies... I never buy movies anymore or go to the theater (maybe once in a blue moon). I get all my movies from the Internet for free...
  • T A Christine 2012/06/22 00:56:28
    T A
    Not quite what I'm saying although I also don't go to movies. Simply put, actors only make perhaps a dollar or two (way too high) of what an individual pays to see a film, but they make that millions of times over. Public school teachers (in my area) make 80K/yr which is roughly $15.24/day/student which is more than the actor/butt in seat. However the teacher can only teach say 30 kids at one time whereas the actor can entertain 10Mil+ moviegoers per film (1.7Bil in the case of Stewart). If said teacher could reach 10 Mil students at the same rate of pay she currently receives per student, her pay would be about $152.4Mil. Kristin Stewart earned about 2.5% gross receipts for breaking Dawn and New Moon which totaled $1.414B - $0.02/attendee. Kristin Stewart is paid .13%/ attendee what the teacher is paid per student. The teacher is paid 762 times as much per student. If the teacher reached as many as watched the two movies she would earn $25.9B. We would have far fewer teachers as well I think.

    Teachers could make much more with the current level of taxation by simply cutting the massively bloated overhead of the salaries for district staffing and non-essential expenses like our current $1Mil+ solar panel addition to our local grade school.
  • jabo Riobhca 2012/06/22 11:31:08
    jabo
    And American politicians just love to rub elbows with them. Makes me sick.
  • Kayla Mace 2012/06/21 18:14:20
  • American Mercenary 2012/06/21 18:12:17
    American Mercenary
    +1
    She's not hot and she's a piss poor actress
  • Devasis... America... 2012/06/22 03:14:02
    Devasish Dewan
    her another plus point is look very innocent. I don't see her much glamourous or hot like other actresses. Not even model figure.
  • kassie ray wall 2012/06/21 18:09:31
    kassie ray wall
    +1
    bitch share the money
  • ϟ Emma ϟ_♥loves♥supernatural♥
    +1
    well she is...
  • TimothyBrianFoley 2012/06/21 17:53:23
    TimothyBrianFoley
    this is all accurate seems she has been out there more all adds up
  • Mrs.Lau... Timothy... 2012/06/22 01:25:58
    Mrs.Lautner <3
    all the other actresses listed have been out there longer than she has and their not getting overpaid..which is completely stupid
  • FunkyMunky 2012/06/21 17:41:25 (edited)
    FunkyMunky
    +1
    Hah! Deserved recognition for mediocrity..
  • Depsycho 2012/06/21 17:33:04
    Depsycho
    +1
    I'm terrible at acting and even I can do better than her. However I'm not sorry I didn't get cast for Bella. That was pretty much the only role someone bland as her was suitable for.
  • FunkyMunky Depsycho 2012/06/21 17:42:25
    FunkyMunky
    +3
    She probably got cast for the part because she is so pale!

Entertainment

2013/05/19 13:51:34

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals