I think the reason teens are for it is they don't really understand what goes into a sex change. You can't reproduce female organs, nor can you reproduce the male organs. You can make someone LOOK like they have female organs but A) they aren't functional, never could be and B) they will still have a Y chromosome.
"well what about women born infertile?" Do you really want to make the comparison between a man who cut off his junk and flipped his penis inside out to a woman who was born with female parts but is infertile?
This is why you had all the people in the comment section asking for us to "define male and female" as though it hasn't already been defined.
If I took a dog, chopped off it's legs and shaved it, cut its tongue to make it forked and did plastic surgery to make it look like a snake, would it be a snake or a dog?
There are things you just can't change.
PUBLIC OPINION > It's OK for Beauty Pageant to Disqualify Transgendered Contestant
SodaHead Celebs
2012/03/27 21:00:00
The Miss Universe Canada beauty pageant found itself in a strange situation when the organization discovered that Jenna Talackova, one of 65 finalists, was not born a woman. The 23-year-old Vancouver native was disqualified because she did not "meet the requirements to compete despite having stated otherwise on her entry form." Officials say the rules require that contestants be "naturally born females," but Talackova argues that she has considered herself a woman since the age of four and has undergone reassignment surgery. Good Morning America asked the public if Miss Universe Canada officials were discriminating when they disqualified her.
Unfortunately for Talackova, the public is not on her side. However, in this case it's especially important that we pin down the reason behind the public's decision, as this is a controversial issue despite an apparent consensus. The key factor in ruling the disqualification "fair" was not the public's stance on the LGBT community, or even the public's stance on what should be allowed in such a pageant -- though both obviously influenced some voters. The deciding factor was the rule book.
We couldn't find a digital copy of the Miss Universe Canada requirements, but one official did say that the rules specifically require that each contestant be a "naturally born female." Since "female" denotes chromosomal makeup, there's really no way Talackova can evade it. Perhaps she can present an argument against the rule book for future pageants, but this year she's out of luck.
We couldn't find a digital copy of the Miss Universe Canada requirements, but one official did say that the rules specifically require that each contestant be a "naturally born female." Since "female" denotes chromosomal makeup, there's really no way Talackova can evade it. Perhaps she can present an argument against the rule book for future pageants, but this year she's out of luck.
Teens Support Talackova
Even though the overall results suggest a consensus, there was little agreement in the demographics. Age, for instance, had an enormous correlation. Teens were inversely adamant about allowing Talackova to participate in the pageant, while some older age groups were nearly unanimous.
Liberals Relatively Reserved
The political spectrum is a good illustration of why the results turned out so heavily against Talackova. Not surprisingly, liberals were far more likely than conservatives to call the ruling discriminatory, but they were not nearly as decided as conservatives. While an overwhelming 92% of conservatives voted "fair," liberals were still very close to a split decision, presumably because of the rule-book argument.
Males Make a Statement
Gender mirrored the political spectrum in that men showed a strong opinion and women were relatively undecided, but the reasoning here is a little less obvious. We suspect the primary factor here is that men don't want to accidentally oggle someone who used to be a man. Even for men who are reasonably progressive, the idea might seem a bit awkward.
If you'd like to vote on this question, dig deeper into the demographics, or engage in existing discussion about the topic, visit Good Morning America's poll about Jenna Talackova. We'd love to hear from you!
Top Opinion
-
Sterling 2012/03/27 22:03:52
Pablo
Sharp hip bones are a royal pain ;~)
It doesn't matter how hot a man is, he will remain a man and every other man will not want to go 20 feet near him/her.
...is MORE pretty then...
this girl who was born a man???
I mean I'm not saying one of them is more pretty but they both look really hot!! You can't deny it either!!
Essentially you're saying if you didn't know they were transsexual you would find them attractive. Which means you could have sex with one (even be married with one) and not even know it. The only way you'd know is if they told you (they could just use the excuse they are infertile when babies aren't produced). And if they did tell you, you'd suddenly not like them and disregard the relationship you had with them simply because of...what? I want to know. Because if you did like them before, why would you throw everything away just because they don't have a real vagina. You couldn't even tell the difference before. Are you afraid of being labeled gay or of how other people will perceive you? Or are you afraid of how *you* would perceive you? It sounds more about how the person makes you look.
Admitting you like a transsexual may lower your status in society and among your friends/family, so whether you find the transsexual attractive or not, you get turned of by that idea (not them). From my view I feel like the *ide...
Essentially you're saying if you didn't know they were transsexual you would find them attractive. Which means you could have sex with one (even be married with one) and not even know it. The only way you'd know is if they told you (they could just use the excuse they are infertile when babies aren't produced). And if they did tell you, you'd suddenly not like them and disregard the relationship you had with them simply because of...what? I want to know. Because if you did like them before, why would you throw everything away just because they don't have a real vagina. You couldn't even tell the difference before. Are you afraid of being labeled gay or of how other people will perceive you? Or are you afraid of how *you* would perceive you? It sounds more about how the person makes you look.
Admitting you like a transsexual may lower your status in society and among your friends/family, so whether you find the transsexual attractive or not, you get turned of by that idea (not them). From my view I feel like the *idea* disgusts you not *them* (otherwise you wouldn't like them in the first place). But that's my opinion. Maybe I'm completely and utterly wrong. So by all means explain to me the issue.
Another question, does this mean you'd like a female-to-male transsexual? They usually still have vaginas and it seems to be all you care about.
Yet to me, (s)he's so manly, I don't think you'd be attracted to this at all...
Though I do agree with you (:
Give me a break!