Quantcast

PUBLIC OPINION > Alec Baldwin's Paparazzi Beatdown Was Justified

SodaHead Celebs 2012/06/22 16:00:00
Maybe "beatdown" is a little harsh, but there's photographic evidence that "30 Rock" star Alec Baldwin got physical with a paparazzo on his way out of the NYC Marriage License Bureau. The photographer says Baldwin rushed at him like a bull, unprovoked, and punched him square in the chin. Baldwin hasn't said much on the matter, except that #allpaparazzishouldbewaterboarded. His words. We asked the public if the "beatdown" was justified.

baldwin paparazzi

It looks like Baldwin doesn't have to explain himself -- the public is already on his side. Though supporters didn't seem to care much about what actually happened. They were just happy to see the paparazzi get what was coming. Even by the photographer's account, at worst it was an unprovoked punch. But with the paparazzi, "unprovoked" is a loose term. One commenter wrote, "When you are asked to back off and stop, and refuse, then you become offensive to people, and celebrities are people who deserve a little bit of privacy."

Older Voters Aren't Amused

For younger voters, particularly those under the age of 45, the event was actually a little bit humorous. No one really likes the paparazzi, so it seems like fair game for a nice laugh. But older voters took the matter more seriously. They were more likely to suggest that celebrities choose that type of life when they promote themselves. That doesn't justify an assault.

Girls Get Rowdy

We were surprised to find that female voters were actually more likely to say Baldwin's attack was justified. We expected men to be more gung-ho with the violent reaction. Plus, the tabloids paparazzi shoot for are usually marketed to women. But girls know a good story when they see one, and they're not going to let social graces get in the way of a little street justice.

The Well-Off Wave a Finger

Income had an unexpected impact on how respondents voted. Even though Baldwin is clearly the wealthier party here, lower income voters tended to side with him against the paparazzi. Maybe it's his satirical CEO character, Jack Donaghy from "30 Rock," that won them over. Higher income voters were much more likely to side with the photographer, though the sample size was a little rough.

If you'd like to vote on this question, dig deeper into the demographics, or engage in existing discussion about the topic, visit our poll about Baldwin's beatdown. We'd love to hear from you!
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • george 2012/06/23 08:03:03
    george
    +1
    I've always felt that the paparazzi are lowest in the food chain but Alec, along with Mel Gibson and a few others, is his worst own enemy. The man is not too stable.
  • Pamela ... george 2012/06/23 18:19:51
    Pamela Perkins
    +1
    He is a drunk!
  • Somkey the Hores 2012/06/23 07:35:54
    Somkey the Hores
    +3
    Alec Baldwin is a jackass.
  • NumptyNuts Somkey ... 2012/06/23 17:38:56
    NumptyNuts
    +1
    Do you own a camera and stalk peeps Hore?
  • Pamela ... NumptyNuts 2012/06/23 18:23:32
    Pamela Perkins
    +2
    Baldwin is a poor excuse for a man.
  • Somkey ... Pamela ... 2012/06/24 07:27:47
    Somkey the Hores
    He thinks he's special and above everyone else. He's a TYPICAL Dem moonbat wannabe elitist.
  • Pamela ... Somkey ... 2012/06/25 19:05:21
  • Somkey ... NumptyNuts 2012/06/24 07:25:58
  • jubil8 BN-0 PON 2012/06/23 05:56:28
    jubil8 BN-0 PON
    +3
    The idea that you deserve to have a camera stuck in your face if you get in front of one for your living is stupid. Who says? Is anyone seriously saying that if they can't see a photo of Alex Baldwin waving a Marriage License, he's history? Please.

    I've never seen a signed doc where a "star" said "I give up all control over my private life and will let others decide when I should be allowed to have one."
  • Chris 2012/06/23 04:24:42
    Chris
    +3
    The problem with Paparazzi is they often commit several crimes and/or unethical acts, harassment, stalking, invasion of privacy, etc... taking a picture at a distance is fine but they often get in the person's face, stunning their eyes with constant flashes, barking stupid comments at them, following them when they're driving, flashing cameras at them as they drive making it unsafe for them to drive.
  • jumpboots 187th PIR 2012/06/23 02:35:11
    jumpboots 187th PIR
    +3
    BOOBWIN"At again.......Grow up.........
  • Pamela ... jumpboo... 2012/06/23 18:25:54
    Pamela Perkins
    +3
    He loves the publicity.
  • jumpboo... Pamela ... 2012/06/23 19:52:19
  • wtw 2012/06/23 02:34:28
    wtw
    +2
    Such a typical lib--wants all the money from being a celeb but none of the responsibilities like most libs!
  • luke wtw 2012/06/23 03:40:05
    luke
    +4
    Oh look, it's a "let's make everything deal with politics" SH user.
  • wtw luke 2012/06/23 03:40:30
    wtw
    +1
    Just having fun!
  • Pamela ... wtw 2012/06/23 18:27:56
    Pamela Perkins
    +1
    That's ok, he is a liberal.
  • Pamela ... wtw 2012/06/23 18:26:31
    Pamela Perkins
    You are right!
  • Sammi </3 2012/06/23 01:40:27
    Sammi </3
    +2
    look he human. how would you feell if you had a camera in your face all the time? it really sucks and they must have been on his last nevere than they did that so he snaped
  • C-ZAR™, Emperor of the PHÆT 2012/06/23 01:26:48
  • You Know IT 2012/06/22 23:06:53
    You Know IT
    +3
    the paparazzi just get on yer nerves sometimes, they should respect one's rights to privacy if told to leave someone alone.
  • Bunny 2012/06/22 23:02:02
    Bunny
    +1
    Celebs are human too.I could only take so much of the paparazzi either.
  • Vixnbrianaf 2012/06/22 22:54:37
    Vixnbrianaf
    +5
    I have mixed feelings....first of all, he knows he is a celebrity and has to accept that ignorant people that have no lives and no intellectual stimulation eat these rag mags up like they are heroin. On the other hand I can't stand how the paparazzi seem to think they can just be up in their business and follow them around like this. Chances are he was provoked, and no one witness what provoked it, OR they did but because they are on the same side of that fence will keep their mouths shut about it. I'm no Alec Baldwin fan (I only like Adam, he is awesome) but I am pretty sure he was pushed to this.
  • johnnyg 2012/06/22 22:39:48
    johnnyg
    +1
    Baldwin is "famous" he should expect paparazzi.
  • Bob DiN johnnyg 2012/06/24 12:13:50
    Bob DiN
    +2
    Baldwin is famous for being a wacko.
  • shotgun the 3rd 2012/06/22 22:28:29
    shotgun the 3rd
    +2
    If he was provoked or the guy laid gis hands on him, I say yes knock the crap out of him. But if the guy was just taking pictures and not threating him, he should go to jail for assault.
  • Justin Teufel Hunden 2012/06/22 21:53:01
    Justin Teufel Hunden
    +1
    He's a Baldwing. The camera guy/'cable guy' shoulda known. Like herpes...just when you think you're in the clear...it'll re-appear! Lol
  • Aingean 2012/06/22 21:18:39
    Aingean
    +1
    If I were famous I'd get tired of having people shoving cameras in my face too. That being said, he should have at least gave the guy a warning to back off.
  • johnnyg Aingean 2012/06/22 22:41:32
    johnnyg
    +1
    NO, if you are famous you EXPECT cameras.
  • Medulla... johnnyg 2012/06/23 17:12:35
    Medulla Oblongata
    It's one thing to expect cameras because you're a celebrity. It's entirely another when those cameras are just glorified stalkers.
  • Pamela ... johnnyg 2012/06/23 18:30:08
    Pamela Perkins
    +1
    Yes and he loves it.
  • johnnyg Pamela ... 2012/06/27 15:04:16
    johnnyg
    More publicity.
  • Heisenberg 2012/06/22 21:04:26
    Heisenberg
    +1
    Well the paparazzo deserved it. This is one group of people I think should be exterminated from the gene pool.
  • Jorge Enriquez 2012/06/22 20:00:30
    Jorge Enriquez
    no s****
  • Michael 2012/06/22 19:55:20
    Michael
    +4
    Suppose I am in the minority. Without the fans, where would movie stars be! Without the photographers to flood the magazines and twitter waves where would the stars be! Working as a waiter at McDonalds!
  • kfallslady Michael 2012/06/23 01:59:04
    kfallslady
    +1
    I agree
  • keifer 2012/06/22 19:47:52
  • Airhead 2012/06/22 19:46:41
  • Michael 2012/06/22 19:33:52
    Michael
    +1
    I really think that many paparazzi already get in celebrities faces about their personal life. most celebreties are just trying to get on with their lives. If the paparazzi touched Alec Baldwin then he is justified but if there was no contact involved then i don't think its right.
  • Christopher Kirchen 2012/06/22 18:07:44
    Christopher Kirchen
    +1
    It's about time someone did it and taught those asses some respect.

Entertainment

2013/06/20 08:09:29

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals