Hines Ward, the Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver, was put in handcuffs at gun point Thursday in Los Angeles by the LAPD (Los Angeles Police Department).
Ward, the Super Bowl XL MVP and "Dancing With the Stars" (DWTS) contestant, was stopped after police identified the car he was in as a stolen vehicle.
It turns out Ward was a passenger in the car that was reported stolen. The driver of the car, Ward's female friend, had reported it stolen weeks earlier. She tried to tell that to the police when they arrested her and Ward.
LAPD Sgt. Maria Morrison said they released Ward and the driver without incident.
"She had gone somewhere, misparked it, reported it stolen and found it later," but failed to cancel the police report, Morrison said.
The police did not file charges against either Ward or the driver. Morrison added that Ward and the female driver cooperated with the police and said, contrary what some "Dancing" stars may suspect, the female driver is not Ward's dancing partner on the hit ABC TV show.
LAPD gets accused of racism often for reasons other than racism. In this case, we don't know the motivation of LAPD for arresting Hines Ward at gunpoint. Obviously, LAPD had the right to stop the car because the license plate came back as a reported stolen car. LAPD has standard felony arrest procedures -- particularly at 1:30 in the morning.
They may not have recognized Hines Ward without his Pittsburgh Steelers jersey, Lombardi Trophy or his DWTS costume ;)
The car they pulled over was reported stolen. There was no cancellation of the stolen-car report. Because the owner of the car didn't call to cancel it.
The cops pulled over, for all they knew, two car thieves who might have been armed and dangerous. Understandably, the cops wanted to go home alive after their shifts were over.
Yes they completely overreacted. Lets be real. The police initially saw a woman with a black male in the passenger seat. In a predominatly white and affluent area. Then they decided to run the tags, because I can guarantee you they had no idea the vehicle was reported stolen till they ran the tags. Once they did that. Then they new they had a valid reason to stop a car with a black man in the passenger seat. Some people may find this hard to believe, but traffic stops like this where black males are involved is quite common. Yes we are living in a modern time. That does not mean attitudes have changed all that much. I'm just glad Hines behaved in a manner that was above reproach.
Hines is getting enamored with himself because of this show, and probably jumped into this car with this girl and didn't think about any consequences.Wonder if his wife knows?I am assuming this is standard procedure for the police when a stolen car is involved.
Seems his friends leave things undone, she should have called the police to report her car found and none of this would have occurred. I believe the police responded as they are supposed too.
Stolen car? Black guy riding in it? Pull out the steel bracelets and the guns, L.A. police! We all know that the LAPD doesn't have a great track record when dealing with black dudes. However, the woman driving the car in which Hines Ward was a passenger was a total dumbass. I mean, how stupid do you have to be to forget where you parked your car, report it stolen and then find the car, yet fail to notify the police that the car was in fact not stolen? Of course, then this ditzy broad could have been charged with filing a false police report. In the end, other than bad press for Ward, nobody was arrested, and nobody got hurt.
This was an overreaction, someone could have got hurt. Police usually over react when minorities are involved and as long as "nobody got hurt" it's alright to some people. Maybe it's alright because this doesn't happen to you but it is never alright when police act this way.
Well, I believe I SAID that the LAPD has a bad reputation when it comes to dealing with blacks and other minorities. I also VOTED that this was an overreaction on their part. All I'm saying is no harm, no foul. However, I have a funny feeling that Hines Ward is going to want at least a public apology from the LAPD for taking things too far. The part of the article I found strange was that the cops said, "The police did not file charges against either Ward or the driver...and Ward and the female driver cooperated with the police." It's like, what did they EXPECT them to do? Resist arrest or start a riot? Thanks for your comments, and have a great day!
The problem is the "no harm, no foul" is, as long as that attitude is continued police will continue to pull over and harrass minorities for no other reason than our race. The rest of your post I agree with and raved.
Thanks for the rave! Now that I think about it, you're probably correct about my "no harm, no foul" comment. Incidents like the one with Hines Ward only perpetuate the LAPD's bad track record when it comes to dealing with minorities. Although I'm a white tigger, I'm definitely opposed to racial profiling, which IMO, this definitely was. Thanks for making an excellent point!
Why, thank you. Never let it be said that THIS tigger is close-minded and too smart not to listen to others' opinions, and perhaps even change her mind!
Because the car had been reported as stolen, they perhaps thought the individual responsible would be armed and dangerous. Not far fetched at all. Apparently, Hines has not come forward with any accusations of mistreatment.
Minor problem the only way they knew that car was stolen was when they ran the tags on that car. Unless they were speeding which was not mentioned in the article. They apparently ran the tags because they saw a black male in a vehicle late at night in an affluent predominatly white neighborhood. Lets be real it isn't like they keep a running list of stolen cars on hand all the time.
Yep, if it was at gun point they did. I can understand putting him in the handcuffs, I think that's SOP but I see no reason for the gun unless he was being aggressive.
Actually, it's not. And if guns were drawn, I am sure they were holstered once the suspects were handcuffed and no longer a possible danger to the cops.
It's not? So let's say that an angry ex reports your car as stolen and you comply with the officer, civilly explaining the misunderstanding yet the officer draws his gun...that's not excessive? I hope you never become a cop. Taking someone into custody until the situation is cleared is one thing but holding a suspect at gunpoint who is not only compliant but unarmed is completely out of line.
still excessive force you only need to pull out a gun when you're arresting someone who is resisting or who might be armed/dangerous. If i got pulled over for speeding it would be unnecessary for a cop put a gun to my head while ordering me to present him with I.D.
everytime you report your car stolen the Police tell you..........."IF YOU FIND YOUR CAR BEFORE WE DO.....DO NOT GET IN IT. CALL US AND LET US KNOW THAT YOU FOUND IT OR YOU WILL BE ARRESTED FOR CAR THEFT."
they make a point of saying this to everyone who reports a car stolen.
Actually, I checked the wrong one. I think it is standard practice for the offense. She should have called when she found the car. Most law enforcement take care theft seriously.
The car they pulled over was reported stolen. There was no cancellation of the stolen-car report. Because the owner of the car didn't call to cancel it.
The cops pulled over, for all they knew, two car thieves who might have been armed and dangerous. Understandably, the cops wanted to go home alive after their shifts were over.
You just don't get it do you?
Because they said so??
Smart move.
they make a point of saying this to everyone who reports a car stolen.
I bet she wont forget next time.
Thats what they do when people are in a stolen car. Sucks being him, but they do that to all that get in the wrong car.