Olivia Wilde Says Divorce Isn’t a Tragedy: Do You Agree?
SodaHead Celebs
2011/05/05 21:05:22
|
|
|||||
|
68 votes
|
|
50% | |||
|
69 votes
|
|
50% | |||
"House" star Olivia Wilde told Glamour that, in her experience, divorce is not a tragedy. Her divorce is simply a time to admit that she was unhappy with her life, and a chance to change that and move on to something better.
Wilde was 18 when she married Tao Ruspoli in 2003. Ruspoli was 27 at the time. They filed for divorce in February after eight years together.
Sometimes it’s only eight years and it’s great, and you have to know when it ends ... The mark of a good marriage is partnership and continuing to feel inspired by your spouse. I had that with Tao. But the end is not necessarily the tragedy. Staying in a relationship that is no longer working is the tragedy. Living unhappily—that’s the tragedy.
Wilde was 18 when she married Tao Ruspoli in 2003. Ruspoli was 27 at the time. They filed for divorce in February after eight years together.
Read More: http://www.hollywoodlife.com/2011/05/05/olivia-wil...






















I hope for her next husband's sake that she never remarries.
Doubly so if you have kids.
Seems most here are just looking at the actual act of 'divorce' itself...... but, it's all about the big picture. Everything that leads up to the divorce is part of the equation.
People talking about how terrible their ex-spouse was... heck, you married them for a reason. And how many sides are there to a story? :-)
It is so true!!
Just thought that was a peculiar statement..... especially when following "I'm very straight."
Is there something you're not telling us?.. haha!
[edit] Also, i think there is too much weight put on the word D*I*V*O*R*C*E. It's basically nothing more than finalization of a partnership with financial and other benefits that just didn't work out. Emotions and expectations (betrayal, or a single/handed decision with no room for discussion or reconciliation) make it a tragedy.