Octomom Has a Boyfriend: Happy for Her or Bothered by It?

by SodaHead Celebs Posted 2012/06/26 13:00:00

Related Topics: octomom, Boyfriend, Porn, Church, Nadya Suleman

463 votes
Read all 360 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Happy for her	293 votes	63%
	Bothered by it	170 votes	37%

Porn seems to have done wonders for Nadya "Octomom" Suleman's love life. The same week Wicked Pictures released a trailer for her debut porn film, SheKnows reports that the 36-year-old mother of 14 has a new boyfriend named "Frankie G." And he's, uh, 23 years old. Nothing that Jennifer Lopez wouldn't do, right? He's also an amateur bodybuilder, and they reportedly met through church.

Frankie said, "It has its moments. Obviously she has a lot of kids, but it's wonderful. I enjoy it. And she's a wonderful person -- she has a wonderful heart." A wonderful heart? Maybe. But he'd better have a wonderful wallet to support her wonderful heart, or she's going to keep returning to porn. What does amateur bodybuilding pay these days? Anyway, are you happy for Nadya "Octomom" Suleman, or does this whole relationship rub you the wrong way?

+22

Add a comment above

Jersey Roze ♥Jwon's Cyar'ika ♥ 2012/06/26 14:10:53

Happy for her

+26
Why should I care about her love life enough for it to bother me? And please, somebody get him an application for The Jersey Shore!...
>> See Replies

More polls by SodaHead Celebs

Handel9652 2012/06/27 02:20:13

Bothered by it

+3
There needs to be a third option, because I'm not happy for her, since it's nothing about which to be happy, but I'm also not bothered by it, as that would require a degree of vested interest. It would have been better posed "Octomom Has a Boyfriend: For Love or For Attention".

I don't approve of it, as I have no faith in it being based on anything substantial. They're both getting what they want out of it: cheap publicity.

reply
~HopelessRomanticM17~ 2012/06/27 02:14:10

Bothered by it

+2
She should focus on her children. Not on sex.

reply
Saul Bo... to ~Hopele... 2012/06/27 04:58:46

That's funny... Not! Since when people that have kids, even single mom's, can't have a healthy sex life?

reply
dekecds to Saul Bo... 2012/06/27 06:06:29 (edited)

+1
yep, especially when the tax payers will keep on supporting your broke ass...... have another 14 kids and you'll be at around $8400/month.....that should be enough right? After all, it's your RIGHT to have a healthy sex life, but not my right to not have to pay for it..... (that's strange???)

reply
Helyn Behn to dekecds 2012/06/27 06:27:10

For your information, she did not have sex, when she got pregant with those, yes, all 14 children, she had invitro done to herself, you do know what that is don't you?

reply
Ms. Texas to Helyn Behn 2012/06/27 13:30:01

+1
Ummm...I don't think how the kids got here is in question. I think the fact that they are illegitimate and she can't support them on her own and the taxpayers are getting screwed is what is in question here. You do know that, don't you??

reply
Saul Bo... to Ms. Texas 2012/06/28 13:49:26

" illegitimate" ? Mate, this is not the 17th century. How can they be illegitimate, basically bastards, if their conception was by in-vitro? You are stretching the definition of the word.

reply
Ms. Texas to Saul Bo... 2012/07/04 10:15:23 (edited)

Mate, you are correct that this is not the 17th century. This is the 21st century and there is a thing called Google. Use it to look up illegitimate and two of the definitions you will find define illegitimate as: born of parents who are not married to each other, and born out of wedlock. That is exactly the situation in this case. Therefore, you are incorrect in saying I am stretching the definition of the word. Go correct someone else.

reply
dekecds to Helyn Behn 2012/06/27 18:20:17

+1
The result is the same. Just because I rob a store from the back door and get a light sentence for first offense doesn't mean that I get the same sentence when I return to rob it from the front door (because it's different right?). In my opinion she gave up her right to risk having more kids when she failed to support the first set.

reply
~Hopele... to Saul Bo... 2012/06/28 04:36:33

Well, when you have 8 kids...and are a fame whore....

reply
Saul Bo... to ~Hopele... 2012/06/28 13:51:16

And how exactly does having 8 children and being a fame whore impedes you from having a healthy sex life? Ladies and Gentleman, lets be a little more pragmatic, and a little less judgmental shall we?

reply
~Hopele... to Saul Bo... 2012/06/28 19:49:59

Well if she is capable of handling her children while having an active love life, she can go right ahead...but she should have her biggest priority be her family.

reply
Saul Bo... to ~Hopele... 2012/06/28 21:51:25

+1
Now we are in complete agreement. Indeed her foremost priority should be indeed her children.

reply
Liz Del Rey 2012/06/27 01:59:02

Happy for her

+1
i thought that was Pauly D! Ha..

reply
Karl 2012/06/27 01:53:51

Happy for her

+1
Maybe one day when I grow up, I'll be able to give a s***.

reply
Happy 2012/06/27 01:29:55

Bothered by it

+1
i just don't care.

reply
MIRANDDAAA :) 2012/06/27 01:24:27

Bothered by it

+2
I think it's great that she's found someone, but I'm bothered that this is considered major news.

reply
David 2012/06/27 01:21:06

Bothered by it

+2
Whore/Fame addict + Douche bag = big enough news to get on SodaHead.

reply
Elz 2012/06/27 00:45:29

Happy for her

+1
good for her i guess. it doesn't bother me at all.

reply
Will 2012/06/27 00:44:59

Happy for her

+1
Not that I care but happiness to her and her new beau.

reply
Rob 2012/06/27 00:33:27 (edited)

Bothered by it

+1
You know what...I wrote a long statement about this, but screw it. I just deleted it because people like her, and her supporters, will never change.

reply
Meako to Rob 2012/06/27 08:33:39

why care?

reply
EmoKiss:3 2012/06/27 00:16:44

Happy for her

+3

reply
rascal 2012/06/27 00:09:42

Happy for her

+1
she has every right to be happy just like everyone else.

reply
Ferηαηdσ [Clinton2016] 2012/06/27 00:06:37

Happy for her

+1
Don't care.

reply
katy.isodo 2012/06/27 00:01:56

Happy for her

+2
If she's happy, great for her - I'm still not sure why it's any of the public's business. If the children are not being abused or neglected, leave them be. She's made bad choices, mistakes.. but we all have. Consider yourself blessed that your dirty laundry isn't aired all over the media.

reply
Tennessee3501 2012/06/26 23:35:56

Bothered by it

+1
I am personally very jealous! I have always dreamed of marrying a woman with 14 children and then having 11 of our own. My wife would be known as the quarter century mom. LOL !

reply
Firefly 2012/06/26 23:34:18

Happy for her

+2
Good for her !

reply
Sachikø-the-shy-kunoichi 2012/06/26 23:13:32

Bothered by it

reply
Hopscotch 2012/06/26 23:04:01

Happy for her

+2
Where's her trophy?

reply
Firefly to Hopscotch 2012/06/26 23:33:28

Standing right next to her ;0 )

reply
Hopscotch to Firefly 2012/06/26 23:55:18

+2

reply
Firefly to Hopscotch 2012/06/27 00:02:06

+1

reply
Hopscotch to Firefly 2012/06/27 00:28:28

+1

reply
Crypt_H... to Firefly 2012/06/27 03:10:16

+1
Seconded...I found myself doing exactly that.

reply
Firefly to Crypt_H... 2012/06/27 03:39:50

reply
kudabux 2012/06/26 22:35:52

Bothered by it

+1
Eight more on the way! LOL

reply
Jannis 2012/06/26 22:34:00

Happy for her

+2
Aside from what she has been threw and her many kids....im glad that she met someone that may love her for who she is.

reply
kraftymomma1979 2012/06/26 22:30:16

Bothered by it

+3
She needs a therapist, not a boyfriend. Her children need a guardian ad litem, not a hanger-on.

reply
Saul Bo... to kraftym... 2012/06/27 05:04:06

Way to go! Do you think throwing some latim in a sentence will make your opnion more credible?
Anyway, therapists and boyfriends are not mutually exclusive, just so you know.

reply