Quantcast

No love for radical islam

iamnothere 2011/03/06 15:02:57
Ex-Rep, 'Gopher' Leaves Radio Show After Alleged Pressure Over Islam Comments

By Judson Berger

Published March 05, 2011

Fred Grandy, the former "Love Boat" star who served several terms in Congress before landing a gig as a radio host, resigned from his show this week after he was pressured to stop talking so much about radical Islam, his wife, Catherine, told FoxNews.com.

Catherine Mann-Grandy, who spoke with FoxNews.com extensively about the details of their split with WMAL management, confirmed that the couple's critical commentary on radical Islam was the driving factor behind Grandy's resignation.

"You're not allowed to talk about what's happening in your country," she said.

Fred Grandy, best known for his role as Gopher in "The Love Boat," had been on air as a host at Washington, D.C.'s WMAL since 2003. He worked most recently as host of "The Grandy Group" -- his wife made regular appearances on that show under the nickname "Mrs. Fred."

But while both of them started devoting more and more segments to the subject of Muslim influence in America over the past year, it was Catherine's comments that apparently led to an ultimatum.

Mann-Grandy, who did a regular segment called "domestic terrorism 101," hit a string of topics on their show last Friday. Though the segment was taken off the radio's site, she described it. She said that, on air, she quoted a rabbi who compared radical Muslims to Nazis, complained that President Obama was not doing enough to help Israel, warned that "Shariah-compliant" individuals work in the government and discussed several other Islam-related topics.

Perhaps sensing she might have stepped over a line, she warned on air about the possibility that she might not return the following week.

Sure enough, she didn't.

Mann-Grandy said her husband told her Tuesday that management told him she could no longer be on the show. Further, she said her husband was told to "really tone it down on the Islam stuff."

In response, Fred Grandy resigned.

Though he was not able to discuss his departure in detail for legal reasons, Fred Grandy also confirmed to FoxNews.com "it was my decision."

Jeff Boden, president and general manager of WMAL, disputed Mann-Grady's account.

"To be clear, at no time has WMAL told Fred that he was not allowed to discuss his views on Islam over the air," he said in a statement to FoxNews.com. "In fact, he has done so on numerous occasions. Further, WMAL has not been contacted by any organization seeking to restrict his broadcasts."

"WMAL remains committed to its goal of providing a forum for discussing a broad spectrum of issues while delivering compelling programming including Chris Plante, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Mark Levin," he added.

The sudden departure immediately triggered rumors that the Council on American Islamic Relations, the country's largest Muslim advocacy group, was somehow involved -- a charge CAIR denied. Mann-Grandy said she thinks that's what happened, though she doesn't have evidence.

"That is just my gut instinct," she said. Fred Grandy said he had "no conclusive evidence."

WMAL, which carries several programs featuring conservative pundits, dumped host Michael Graham several years ago following comments he made about Islam and a subsequent campaign against the station's advertisers by CAIR.

James Lafferty, chariman of the Virginia Anti-Shariah Task Force, accused WMAL of becoming "the first Shariah-compliant radio station in America."

Reached for comment, Lafferty said the host was told to tone it down and keep his wife off the program.

CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper attributed the charges against his group to the "extreme anti-Muslim blogosphere."

"That claim is as credible as any other claim these hate mongers make," he told FoxNews.com. "They make it up out of whole cloth."

Hooper said CAIR had not even made any complaints to the station about Grandy.

The Washington Post reported that Grandy's ratings had also been trailing those of other right-leaning hosts.

But Lafferty alleged that WMAL caved to pressure. The group called on listeners to call the station Monday and Tuesday to demand Grandy and his wife return to the show.

Mann-Grandy, claiming she and her husband have gotten hundreds of e-mails of support, said she doesn't think they'll be asked to return but suggested she'd go back on air.

"I would be happy if someone else did that segment ... but nobody's doing it," she said.

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • MIKEY 2011/03/07 14:05:24
    MIKEY
    +2
    all people left and right should be able to speak freely..thats what america is all about...as much as i might not agree with a person on an issue i would never want to silence them...human nature is to express an opinion or a feeling about something in some way...freedom of speak is key to the survival of humans...
  • Lobster Man 2011/03/07 12:35:30
    Lobster Man
    +1
    No love here screw the Bastards love screw bastards no terrorist
  • LTMeadows214 2011/03/06 18:16:32
    LTMeadows214
    +1
    Treason - Violations of allegiance toward one's sovereign or the betrayal of one's own country by waging war against it or by consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies.
    islam is America's enemy help them in anyway you are commiting treason.
  • none 2011/03/06 17:43:49
    none
    +4
    Someone has to tell America about the Muslim problem that is facing our country, most are afraid to talk about it. What happened to the First Ammendment.
  • micheleT BN-O 2011/03/06 16:21:32
    micheleT BN-O
    +2
    Why don't they let people have freedom of speech?
  • Frank 2011/03/06 15:46:51 (edited)
    Frank
    +1
    This is not a freedom of speech issue. He and his wife are allowed to say whatever they want. However,the radio station is under no obligation whatsoever to broadcast anything that they are uncomfortable with for any reason. A station that carries Rush Limbaugh who intentionally stirs the pot with inflammatory comments, sounds pretty lenient with regard to the comments that it allows to be broadcast. They have got to be pretty over the top to make this station uneasy. Just because comments are incendiary, does not mean that they are being represented accurately.

    Personally, I have an equal distrust for an extremist view of any religion.

    The best answer- the only answer to prevent any government (especially ours) from being infiltrated by any religion is secular government- a sound adherence to what Jefferson described as "constructing a wall of separation of Church from State"

    It seems to me that the elements out there that are most concerned- or vulnerable- to the rhetoric of establishment of Sharia Law in our culture and government- are those who would pave the way for such through hostility for our greatest founding principle established in the first amendment, and so eloquently defined by Jefferson.

    Afraid of Islam? Keep government secular. It's the only way- that ...
    This is not a freedom of speech issue. He and his wife are allowed to say whatever they want. However,the radio station is under no obligation whatsoever to broadcast anything that they are uncomfortable with for any reason. A station that carries Rush Limbaugh who intentionally stirs the pot with inflammatory comments, sounds pretty lenient with regard to the comments that it allows to be broadcast. They have got to be pretty over the top to make this station uneasy. Just because comments are incendiary, does not mean that they are being represented accurately.

    Personally, I have an equal distrust for an extremist view of any religion.

    The best answer- the only answer to prevent any government (especially ours) from being infiltrated by any religion is secular government- a sound adherence to what Jefferson described as "constructing a wall of separation of Church from State"

    It seems to me that the elements out there that are most concerned- or vulnerable- to the rhetoric of establishment of Sharia Law in our culture and government- are those who would pave the way for such through hostility for our greatest founding principle established in the first amendment, and so eloquently defined by Jefferson.

    Afraid of Islam? Keep government secular. It's the only way- that is not exactly consistent with the narrative of conservatives who want to appeal to evangilicals who want to legislate their religious viewpoints, and believe that the nation was established for them.
    (more)
  • InvaderXion420 2011/03/06 15:13:16
  • Ken 2011/03/06 15:07:20
    Ken
    +2
    Freedom of speech? More like media enablers.
  • Autarchic 2011/03/06 15:07:15
    Autarchic
    +5
    Don't tell the truth, or you're out of here!

Entertainment

2013/05/18 09:01:50

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals