Mila Kunis' GQ Photo Shoot: Sexy or Sleazy?

by SodaHead Celebs Posted 2011/07/13 12:00:00

Related Topics: Mila Kunis, GQ, Sexy, Photos, photo shoot, Black Swan, Natalie Portman, Oscar, SodaHead, Child, Date, Hollywood, Sex, Beauty, Icon

Read More

327 votes
Read all 197 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Sexy	294 votes	90%
	Sleazy	33 votes	10%

Mila Kunis might be a sex symbol, but she's certainly not known for taking it off.

In fact, like her "Black Swan" co-star Natalie Portman, she's one of Hollywood's more graceful beauties, minus that whole Macaulay Culkin thing... And no matter what you think of her looks, we think it's pretty cool she answered a Marine's call to attend the a ball with him.

Anyway, here's a taste of her latest photo shoot for GQ:

cool answered marines attend ball taste latest photo shoot gq

Damn. We didn't know she had it in her.

+15

Add a comment above

♠♠♠JeLLo♠♠♠ 2011/07/13 19:31:20

Sexy

+9
She is gorgeous. She has on a see through top with panties and a bra! That's less then you see on a beach, nothing sleazy at all! Hell if I had her body people would have to pay me to wear clothes. lol
>> See Replies

More polls by SodaHead Celebs

Logan 2012/07/19 14:12:39

Sexy

I don’t care what people are calling them. She is a very attractive woman and the more pics like this the better. If Mila feels comfortable presenting herself in this manner then my all means tear it up. How many of us out there could only dream of being so comfortable in our own skin to pose like this. Cong rates and good for her is what is say.

reply
bosshog22 2011/08/05 17:14:57

Sexy

And to think i thought she was a nerd with voiceover work for family guy

reply
cybernestical 2011/08/05 13:57:11

Sexy

Attractive

reply
Fluttershyfan 2011/07/24 06:11:46

Sexy

There have been worse.

reply
vivian 2011/07/24 04:34:25

Sexy

+1
mila is pretty

reply
Mark 2011/07/21 09:15:23

Sexy

+1
Hell yeah, she's hot! It's only those who think she's actually like Jackie from That 70s Show that can't stand her. Fools, the lot of them. XD

reply
Flutter... to Mark 2011/07/24 06:13:17

LOL! Very true. I love that show, but people are idiots to think that people are actually like their TV characters. Never mind. People are stupid, regardless.

reply
..::localeye::.. 2011/07/19 21:54:05

Sexy

+1
Its sitting here right next to me...great cover.

reply
Kayla 2011/07/19 21:25:57

Sexy

+1
Doesn't look sleazy. What you see at the beach is sleazy..or some are...She's very pretty.

reply
zebsmom 2011/07/19 21:24:13

Sexy

+1
Revealing without being "in your face" about it. Pretty tasteful actually.

reply
MunchKin-x 2011/07/19 20:57:24

Sexy

+1
daaayyumm.

reply
PJ 2011/07/19 20:41:55

Sexy

+1
She hot

reply
Flutter... to PJ 2011/07/24 06:12:03

very much so.

reply
Foxy Warrior Guru 2011/07/16 04:16:11

Sexy

+2
She could be sexy in a parka and snow boots.

reply
Incognito4Now 2011/07/16 03:53:58

Sexy

+1
i think any woman who would call this sleazy is just JEALOUS!!! so many non attractive women who are just jealous rule our society.....this woman is beautiful and those who arent jealous and insecure will agree!

reply
A Lionheart 2011/07/16 02:50:03

Sexy

Yuppers!

reply
Witty1 2011/07/14 20:07:01

Sexy

Wow, def sexy! If u found it sleazy, u should get out more.

reply
KittyKat 2011/07/14 14:43:41

Sexy

+1
lol. meow! :P

reply
Nat™ 2011/07/14 08:44:57

Sexy

+1
It's GQ, people. Everyone on the cover is dressed down and sexual.

reply
john rivera 2011/07/14 08:17:46

Sexy

;)

reply
Noobcake 2011/07/14 07:19:47

Sleazy

There should be an option for "sexy AND sleazy". Because obviously it is sexy. That doesn't mean it's not wholly crass.

I don't know why stars feel the need to expose themselves in deliberately provocative ways for men's magazines. It's pornographic. Sure, she's not NAKED but the picture is intended to excite sexual interest. That's porn. Leave it to the pornstars who have already relinquished their dignity entirely.

reply
Flutter... to Noobcake 2011/07/24 06:15:21

I don't disagree with everything you're saying, however, she is in underwear and a see-through shirt. That's less than you see on a beach.

reply
Noobcake to Flutter... 2011/07/25 06:30:11

+1
Whether you regard it as "sleazy" or not is dependent on the context. Generally people don't visit the beach for the sole purpose of provoking sexual excitement in others who view them. As she's in a men's magazine that can be her only motive. I don't think it's inherently *wrong* to do such a thing - she can't really be hurting or offending anyone by it - it's just that I, personally, find it distasteful.

reply
Flutter... to Noobcake 2011/07/25 16:23:34

Again, I do see your point, and as long as you can see mine, can we agree to disagree? :)

reply
Noobcake to Flutter... 2011/07/26 09:28:27

+1
As far as I've determined from reading your original post and responses (both to me and others) your point is that she's hot and I fully share that opinion. So, I agree with you. As for my point, well, it's only my opinion so I fully appreciate your right, and the rights of the rest of the 89 percentile, to feel differently.

reply
««zamboni»»Hellsoldier-BN0 2011/07/14 05:37:23

Sexy

Doubts?

reply
Charles Biscuits 2011/07/14 05:25:44

Sexy

+3

reply
Incogni... to Charles... 2011/07/16 03:16:23

+1
thats a really really cute picture! love it!

reply
Charles... to Incogni... 2011/07/16 03:24:44

+2
A beautiful woman in black boots with spiked heels...it doesn't get better than that.

reply
Flutter... to Charles... 2011/07/24 06:11:30

DAMN she's hot.

reply
Lilymoon 2011/07/14 04:58:43

Sexy

+1
I should only be so lucky to look so sleazy....

reply
Mrkando 2011/07/14 04:57:39

Sexy

+2
Oh yea....very sexy indeed.

reply
Flutter... to Mrkando 2011/07/24 06:16:11

+1
She's very pretty. She's got that natural beauty that would look good even without make-up. Not many celebrities have that.

reply
ernest debrew 2011/07/14 04:26:47

Sexy

+1
But not enough for me. If she can do it like some other women can, I will give her a plus.

reply
ernest ... to ernest ... 2011/07/14 04:28:20

+1

That is naturally sexy to me.

Heck yeah!

reply
ernest ... to ernest ... 2011/07/14 04:29:21

+1
I think that Mila Kunis should dance, wear something sexier, or do something unusually so that she can get my attention.

reply
Incogni... to ernest ... 2011/07/16 03:36:04

the one above here that looks like jennifer anniston makes me wana HURL!!! yuck!! but i love this girls look here..... i mean the one this articles about, what are YOU looking for?

reply
GoatHorns to ernest ... 2011/07/14 05:40:47

both of these girls have had plastic surgery. not so 'natural'

reply
Shadow 2011/07/14 04:26:27

Sexy

+1
Sleazy is when she is pulling off her bra and pushing her panties down. In Australia, the Ralph magazine is full of sleazy women. This does not get any close to it. It's modelling plus it's GQ for crying out loud.

reply
La 2011/07/14 04:13:49

Sleazy

+1
I don't like what she's doing with her mouth, you can see her bra but not a hint of her boobs, and she's got some weird indents along her midriff :/

Not sure if I'd call it "sleazy" but it's definitely not sexy.

reply