Michael Johnson says descendants of slaves have a "superior athletic gene". Was Jimmy the Greek right?
Rogue_Loner
2012/07/06 11:41:07
|
|
|||||
|
14 votes
|
|
41% | |||
|
3 votes
|
|
9% | |||
|
7 votes
|
|
21% | |||
|
6 votes
|
|
18% | |||
|
4 votes
|
|
12% | |||
*************************************************************...
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/olympics-fourth-place-medal/mic...
*************************************************************...
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/olympics-fourth-place-medal/mic...
*************************************************************...






















Why did you throw in all that proggressive stuff and social hypocrisy if that was the question you wanted the answer to. You make these odd logic leaps and expect people to read your mind. I don't know if Jimmy the Greek was right or not. I didn't even know who he was. So I don't know if anything is social hypocrisy or not. But that wasn't the question, was it?
I just think your questions would've been better stated, Why did everyone get mad at Jimmy the Greek and not Michael Johnson?
As written your question reads like, Do you think Jimmy the Greek is right about Genetics?
I just stopped by to say that, as someone who remembers the whole Jimmy the Greek ordeal, this is a very astute observation, and that the connection is indeed valid. Both men said exactly the same thing, about 25 years apart.