Michael Jackson/Debbie Rowe not the biological parents of any of the 3 children: Does this surprise you?

Question Entertainment

Michael Jackson/Debbie Rowe not the biological parents of any of the 3 children: Does this surprise you?

by Gramma Lil Posted June 30, 2009 15:39:53

20 answers
Read all 50 comments
+5 raves

Jackson/Rowe Not the Biological Parents
Posted Jun 30th 2009 10:00AM by TMZ Staff

We've learned Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro -- outside the womb.

Multiple sources deeply connected to the births tell us Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids. Debbie's eggs were not used. She was merely the surrogate, and paid well for her services in the births of Michael Jr. and Paris.

In the case of Prince Michael II (the youngest), we're told the surrogate was never told of the identity of the "receiving parent" -- Michael Jackson. Three days after Prince was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, Jackson's lawyer came to the hospital to pick the baby up and deliver him to Michael.

We do not know if Jackson chose the sperm or egg donors or if he even knew who they were.

Although Rowe is not the biological mother, it's not a slam dunk that she would lose a custody battle. This type of case has never been litigated in California courts. Since Rowe was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born, there's a presumption that she's the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence.

We know there are documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids. Nonetheless, it's still an open issue with the courts.

Answers
Results

		I knew it the whole time!
		I am shocked!
		This is what I think of this.....
		WTF?
		I think they should be checked by social services for sexual abuse!
		He is still their dad!
		Leave Michael alone!!

You!

Add Photos & Videos

Top Comment

+5 BaLou ~supporting our troops~ June 30, 2009 15:43:31

Answered: I knew it the whole time!
I'm not surprised. Those kids look nothing like Michael Jackson.
View thread

Sort By

Most Raves
Least Raves
Oldest
Newest

text size

Comments

+1
jimih67 July 01, 2009 13:43:37

Answered: This is what I think of this.....
I can't say I knew it the whole time, but I am not at all shocked. Look at the kids. There isn't a trace of black in them. I know it is possible for an interracial couple to have kids that look white, but 3? I know Michael Jackson looked white, but he still had black genes. So their paternity doesn't really surprise me.
+1
Gramma Lil to jimih67 July 01, 2009 20:02:16

I thought the same thing for the longest!
+1
Michele to Gramma Lil July 02, 2009 01:17:52

Me too.
+1
Fydo July 01, 2009 06:12:30

Answered: WTF?
I'm already sick of this Michael Jackson crap. Let the poor bastard rest in peace.
Student to Fydo July 21, 2009 00:04:20

Many people have told me the same thing. MJ is resting in peace. We won't let the matter rest. Others are making money off the situation. This could go on for a long time.
+1
skull July 01, 2009 02:17:07

Answered: This is what I think of this.....
The gold digger needs to get lost . Any women who give her kids away for money is nothing to me and my book. Give her more money that what she want she do not care about the kids . She is trash.
+1
hatshepsut123 June 30, 2009 23:25:42 (edited)

Answered: He is still their dad!
he was taking care of them, so that makes him a father.
Student to hatshep... July 20, 2009 23:45:32

The nanny was the other person taking care of the children.
hatshep... to Student July 20, 2009 23:50:13 (edited)

all rich kids have a nanny...maube the nanny is the onnly normal person there who can take care of children! lol
+1
Student to hatshep... July 21, 2009 00:09:33

You are so right.
+2
miranda June 30, 2009 19:53:11

Answered: I am shocked!
ewwwww. to the penis picture.
Gramma Lil to miranda June 30, 2009 21:01:46

OMG! I thought it was a pig....LOL!!
+2
felicia June 30, 2009 19:26:25

Answered: He is still their dad!
the mother gave up parental right of the two oldest children, he raised those three children on his own (well not really own his own but you know what i mean). the mother was never involved. he did everything for them, most parents today rarely ever spend time with their kids. he's their father.
+1
scarletsiren June 30, 2009 16:58:16

Answered: I am shocked!
Wow, was MJ sterile? :o

(I am also shocked at the picture you designated to this poll answer.)
+2
Gramma Lil to scarlet... June 30, 2009 17:14:05

I don't think he was sterile. I think he didn't want his children to have black genes in them. Sad to think that but i do believe he hated the fact that he was black. And why does the picture I disignated shock you...LOL!!
scarlet... to Gramma Lil June 30, 2009 20:59:07

I think you're right about that. He did a pretty good job of looking.. not black.

I guess you're right--there is no better place for googly eyes than on an uncircumcised penis. :)
+1
Gramma Lil to scarlet... July 01, 2009 01:26:50

OH now I see why...I am so sorry! I did not realize what the photo was. I only saw the wording when i chose it!
+2
Dave June 30, 2009 16:41:59

Answered: This is what I think of this.....
Just another example of how weird he was.
+1
flaca June 30, 2009 16:37:36

Answered: WTF?
Unfortunately those kids will be able to read this information as they get older and more curious. I doubt it will help their self-esteem to find out that they were "cultured" pearls and will possibly have no way of knowing who their bio parents are.
+3
spidermonkey™ ♀ June 30, 2009 16:33:45

Answered: This is what I think of this.....
I'm not surprised about Michael Jackson, but I did think Debbie Rowe was the biological mother........
+2
theresa June 30, 2009 16:04:42

Answered: He is still their dad!
So what if he's not there biological Dad?! The poor kids are still alive ain't they? They act fine and happy, even though the Dad that they grew up with is DEAD. They would have run away LONG before now if he had done something to them.
+4
Damaris June 30, 2009 15:57:56

Answered: He is still their dad!
he raised them took care of them gave them love...and a father isnt the one who has the children its the one who takes care of them
Student to Damaris July 20, 2009 23:50:02 (edited)

Your comment is fine. He is the father. His name is on the birth certificate.
Damaris to Student July 21, 2009 00:03:46

you fail at sarcasm
Student to Damaris July 21, 2009 00:20:00 (edited)

Alright.
Damaris to Student July 21, 2009 00:37:27

ok WTF does it matter if they dont like her....and why the frick did you start talking about the nanny? and who gives a frick about her heritage?....what does it matter what his mom told him?.....i dont usually judge people that i dont know...but your just one of those people......
+1
Student to Damaris July 21, 2009 05:22:24 (edited)

None of these things matter. LOL
+1
Student to Damaris July 21, 2009 05:41:35

Your comment was right on. I was not disputing your idea. His name is on the birth certificate and he has taken care of the children.
Damaris to Student July 21, 2009 05:48:48

LOLZ
my bad....i havent slept in like 2 days so sorry if i offended you
Student to Damaris July 21, 2009 05:58:53

That is ok. I thought you had a good comment. It was food for thought. Hope you get some rest.
Damaris to Student July 21, 2009 21:25:49

thanks ^_^
+2
KUDABUX June 30, 2009 15:55:35

Answered: I knew it the whole time!
Seeing no physical resemblance was my first hint.
Student to KUDABUX July 20, 2009 23:51:52

Interesting, all the Jacksons resemble each other.
+2
natabat June 30, 2009 15:48:22

Answered: I think they should be checked by social services for sexual abuse!
im not surprised at all, i was reading something earlier and it said that his kids were conceived out of the womb and that neither michaels sperm or debbies eggs were used so both of them arent even the biological parents
+2
Czar Saoirse~Socialist Extr... June 30, 2009 15:46:40

Answered: He is still their dad!
I read this...and just read an interview where Debbie Rowe said she wants nothing to do with the two kids she gave birth to. I'm not so sure though..because all three kids look remarkably a lot like Michael.
+2
KUDABUX to Czar Sa... June 30, 2009 15:54:52

One of us needs glasses. LOL I see no resemblance whatsoever.
+3
Czar Sa... to KUDABUX June 30, 2009 16:04:55

I do LOL.
+1
theresa to KUDABUX June 30, 2009 16:08:39

i do kinda,,the hair,,the eyes..humm...but the skin? Was Debbie white or black (in the start)?

hum..
+3
Czar Sa... to theresa June 30, 2009 16:26:05

Debbie was white and blonde.
+2
theresa to Czar Sa... June 30, 2009 16:35:39

aah ok so ya..the hair from mj...the skin from debbie..i see it. :D

thanks saoirse :)