Magazine Publishes Photos of Kate Middleton Sunbathing Topless: Biggest British Royal Family Scandal?
SodaHead Slideshows
2012/09/14 14:00:00
SLIDESHOW: Biggest British Royal Family Scandal?
3 of 7
Prince Charles' 'three-person marriage'
Charles married Diana Spencer in 1981, but as Diana famously put it, "there were three of us in this marriage," referring to Camilla Parker-Bowles. Charles and Diana divorced in 1996, and he married Camilla in 2005.
Magazine Publishes Photos of Kate Middleton Sunbathing Topless: Biggest British Royal Family Scandal?
|
|
|||||
|
28,426 votes
|
|
83% | |||
|
1,260 votes
|
|
4% | |||
|
1,372 votes
|
|
4% | |||
|
415 votes
|
|
1% | |||
|
522 votes
|
|
2% | |||
|
502 votes
|
|
1% | |||
|
1,697 votes
|
|
5% | |||
You might want to keep your top on from now on, Kate Middleton. The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are furious at a French magazine that published paparazzi photographs of Kate sunbathing topless in France.
Slamming Closer magazine for publishing the pics, the couple's office said Friday that "their royal highnesses have been hugely saddened to learn that a French publication and a photographer have invaded their privacy in such a grotesque and unjustifiable manner," The New York Times reports.
In the images, Kate was sunbathing at a villa in Provence (where sunbathing topless is de rigueur). But, the royal couple truly believed that nobody was watching them. "Their royal highnesses had every expectation of privacy in the remote house. It is unthinkable that anyone should take such photographs, let alone publish them. Officials acting on behalf of their royal highnesses are consulting with lawyers to consider what options may be available to the Duke and Duchess," the statement continued.
This is only the latest embarrassment for the royal family. Last month, various media outlets published photographs of Kate's brother-in-law, Prince Harry, partying naked in Las Vegas.
Well, the moral of the story is, if you're as famous as Kate Middleton, you're better off keeping your bikini top on! From Kate's topless pics to Prince Harry's various photo ops, click through our slideshow and let us know: What's the biggest British royal family scandal?
Slamming Closer magazine for publishing the pics, the couple's office said Friday that "their royal highnesses have been hugely saddened to learn that a French publication and a photographer have invaded their privacy in such a grotesque and unjustifiable manner," The New York Times reports.
In the images, Kate was sunbathing at a villa in Provence (where sunbathing topless is de rigueur). But, the royal couple truly believed that nobody was watching them. "Their royal highnesses had every expectation of privacy in the remote house. It is unthinkable that anyone should take such photographs, let alone publish them. Officials acting on behalf of their royal highnesses are consulting with lawyers to consider what options may be available to the Duke and Duchess," the statement continued.
This is only the latest embarrassment for the royal family. Last month, various media outlets published photographs of Kate's brother-in-law, Prince Harry, partying naked in Las Vegas.
Well, the moral of the story is, if you're as famous as Kate Middleton, you're better off keeping your bikini top on! From Kate's topless pics to Prince Harry's various photo ops, click through our slideshow and let us know: What's the biggest British royal family scandal?




















So how and can a poor bastard like me sign up for this team?
few months is unbecoming of a military officer. Much less a grandson of HRM Queen
Elizabeth . Come on, Your Royal Highness Prince Harry, and CHILL!!!
I feel sorry for celebrities.
Now, the Queen also pays tax (Voluntarily, legally she isn't required to). The crown estate brought in £203m but we'll leave that aside. It was stated by a Tourism and Branding research group that the Windsor/Royal Brand brings in £4.4x10 10 that's right £44,000,000,000 to Tourism retailers, merchandisers and so on. This figure doesn't take into account the finance the companies get in from having Queens Certificate of Approval or the Royal Seal emblazoned upon it and surprise surprise there is still a real difference that one little symbol makes. It's been calculated to bring in retailers over £100,000,000,000 a year according to Business Analysts in the private sector.
Now bearing in mind that the biggest expense from the Republican party we have is about £200,000,000. Even if you upped that by £600,000,000 accounting for extra security costs and how the public authority accommodates the royal family. There is STILL a huge benefit to the country.
Many private organisations work with the queen on a commercial basis and the royal family is always working around the world engaging business interests and bring more industry to both the commonwealth and the UK in particular.
If it wasn't for the obvious and practical benefits....
Now, the Queen also pays tax (Voluntarily, legally she isn't required to). The crown estate brought in £203m but we'll leave that aside. It was stated by a Tourism and Branding research group that the Windsor/Royal Brand brings in £4.4x1010 that's right £44,000,000,000 to Tourism retailers, merchandisers and so on. This figure doesn't take into account the finance the companies get in from having Queens Certificate of Approval or the Royal Seal emblazoned upon it and surprise surprise there is still a real difference that one little symbol makes. It's been calculated to bring in retailers over £100,000,000,000 a year according to Business Analysts in the private sector.
Now bearing in mind that the biggest expense from the Republican party we have is about £200,000,000. Even if you upped that by £600,000,000 accounting for extra security costs and how the public authority accommodates the royal family. There is STILL a huge benefit to the country.
Many private organisations work with the queen on a commercial basis and the royal family is always working around the world engaging business interests and bring more industry to both the commonwealth and the UK in particular.
If it wasn't for the obvious and practical benefits...I've personally benefited from Prince Charles...I'm currently benefiting from Princess Anne and I have also benefited from Queen Elizabeth through their direct actions... then I'd be of the same view as I am about Christianity. I'd be a complete Republican. As it is I value tremendously everything they do for me and my community. I guess half the time they don't even realise it.
There are a lot of rich people who are only interested in themselves and don't help anyone else and could be got rid of as parasites but the Royal family isn't one of them. For as long as this remains true, I'll remain a Royalist.