Kristen Stewart Says Going Topless for 'On the Road' Was 'Not a Big [Deal]': Agree or Disagree?
SodaHead Celebs
2012/09/17 14:37:18
|
|
|||||
|
230 votes
|
|
71% | |||
|
94 votes
|
|
29% | |||
Kristen Stewart's upcoming movie "On the Road" got mixed reviews coming out of Cannes, but here's one reason why some people might want to see it: she appears topless in the film.


But, the 22-year-old doesn't think the nudity was a big deal. "It didn't bother me," she told MTV News as the Toronto International Film Festival. "You can do no wrong with [director Walter Salles]. He puts so much inside of you. In the four-week rehearsal process, it was OK to ask any question, to bring up any story, to really overanalyze everything and intellectualize everything.
"Once we got on set, it was so about just breathing and letting it happen. He put so much trust in us," she continued. "So it was like, 'OK, so I have to take my clothes off?' It's so not a big [deal]."
That said, she's glad she's 22 now, as opposed to 17, the age she was when she agreed to play Marylou in the movie adaptation of Jack Kerouac's classic novel.
"I should have definitely been older than 17 while playing this part, absolutely," she told MTV. "[My performance] would have been done very differently if I was younger. I wouldn't have played the part, obviously." Do you agree with K-Stew that going topless for the right movie is "no big deal"?
Top Opinion
-
Emily Barrington 2012/09/17 15:32:50Disagree+12I love how she put 'he puts so much inside of you'. Pfft. Yeah like the last film director?
![Kristen Stewart Says Going Topless for 'On the Road' Was 'Not a Big [Deal]': Agree or Disagree? Kristen Stewart Says Going Topless for 'On the Road' Was 'Not a Big [Deal]': Agree or Disagree?](http://images.sodahead.com/polls/003178585/kstew-87892638635_xlarge.jpeg)





















Yes, as a role-model, but a good role model is always good to show people not to be embarrassed with what they have either clothed or in the nude.
And there are Americans (well, people from the USA) that are like you who feel more traditional with themselves and others. You are not alone
Your words. You implied that people must feel some shame for showing their bodies.
That doesn't make any sense. If you believe that god gave you a beautiful body, why would showing it in public be shameful?
"2nd of all, she shouldn't be doing that as being a role-model for many people."
Why not? What's wrong with nudity? It's humanity's natural state. We're not born with clothes on.
The point I'm trying to make is that there's nothing intrinsically shameful or immoral about nudity. You feel the way you do because society as a whole tells you you should. It was how you were raised. It doesn't mean you're right and everyone who doesn't agree with you is wrong or shameless.
As for your question about my theoretical daughter, once she's an adult she can do whatever she wants.
What you make of that is up to you, but it's plainly true.
No its not about wearing skinsuits (Naked or Nude same thing) in the movies, and its not about her either; its about how bout making some quality movies instead of overpaying folks who don't know how to act in movies and in real life as in social ettiquette.
Also, there are many groups around the world that are called "Nudists" where they live Free Nude around others just like them because they accept for who they are and have freedom over it