Kourtney Kardashian Names Baby Girl Penelope: Love It or Hate It?
SodaHead Celebs
2012/07/09 14:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
255 votes
|
|
71% | |||
|
104 votes
|
|
29% | |||
Finally -- a celebrity with a normal baby name. Kourtney Kardashian has named her baby girl Penelope Scotland Disick. (OK, Scotland is a little kooky, but you weren't expecting something totally boring, were you?) Kourtney Kardashian welcomed her second child (and first daughter) with boyfriend Scott Disick early Sunday in Los Angeles at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, E! News reports.
"Scott and I are overjoyed to welcome our precious angel Penelope Scotland Disick into our lives. We are forever blessed. Mommy and baby are resting comfortably," Kourtney, 33, tells E! News. "It was a great. She had an easy delivery," momma Kris Jenner tells E! "[Penelope] is so cute. She looks just like [her big brother] Mason. She's so beautiful. We are so happy." So ... what do you think of the name? It kind of goes with the whole "grandma" name trend going on right now, don't you think?
"Scott and I are overjoyed to welcome our precious angel Penelope Scotland Disick into our lives. We are forever blessed. Mommy and baby are resting comfortably," Kourtney, 33, tells E! News. "It was a great. She had an easy delivery," momma Kris Jenner tells E! "[Penelope] is so cute. She looks just like [her big brother] Mason. She's so beautiful. We are so happy." So ... what do you think of the name? It kind of goes with the whole "grandma" name trend going on right now, don't you think?
Top Opinion
-
Joey 2012/07/09 16:21:28
for example: couples that separate have more legal difficulties...
if unmarried
Martha and Tom are unmarried and have a son, David. Martha earns $1,000.00 gross monthly income while Tom earns $3,000.00 gross monthly income. David lives primarily with Martha during the week, but Tom maintains a close relationship with his son including visits every other weekend from Friday at 6:00 p.m. to Sunday at 6:00 p.m., one overnight every Wednesday night, split holidays and six weeks each summer. Martha and Tom have never obtained court orders regarding custody and visitation of their child.
In this example, if Martha attempts to obtain a child support order, Tom would be ordered to pay $403.00 per month assuming that custody and visitation orders are in place. However, without visitation being formally recognized by the court, the child support calculation would be based on a zero time-share, which would then result in Tom being ordered to pay $562.00 per month. That's a difference of $159.00 per month simply because Martha and Tom never bothered to insure that their agreement regarding their son was made an order of the court.
Tom is also in for another shock if, one day, Martha decides that the contact schedule tha...
for example: couples that separate have more legal difficulties...
if unmarried
Martha and Tom are unmarried and have a son, David. Martha earns $1,000.00 gross monthly income while Tom earns $3,000.00 gross monthly income. David lives primarily with Martha during the week, but Tom maintains a close relationship with his son including visits every other weekend from Friday at 6:00 p.m. to Sunday at 6:00 p.m., one overnight every Wednesday night, split holidays and six weeks each summer. Martha and Tom have never obtained court orders regarding custody and visitation of their child.
In this example, if Martha attempts to obtain a child support order, Tom would be ordered to pay $403.00 per month assuming that custody and visitation orders are in place. However, without visitation being formally recognized by the court, the child support calculation would be based on a zero time-share, which would then result in Tom being ordered to pay $562.00 per month. That's a difference of $159.00 per month simply because Martha and Tom never bothered to insure that their agreement regarding their son was made an order of the court.
Tom is also in for another shock if, one day, Martha decides that the contact schedule that David has been having with his father is no longer working. Without court orders, Tom has no enforceable rights to see David. Going to the police station will be a waste of time because police insist on seeing court orders before intervening in domestic disputes involving children.
This is not a pretty picture. Tom, like many unmarried fathers, is expected to pay child support and will be prosecuted by the District Attorney if he fails to do so. However, there is no one who will fight as rigorously for Tom should he attempt to enforce his right to be a part of his child's life. Tom's only recourse is to seek court orders that will insure that the time he spends with his child is both recognized and protected.
more difficult....
only one person can claim children on their tax return if unmarried.
An ad hominem attack is when you attack a person's motives rather than their beliefs. You're attacking Kourtney Kardashian's newborn baby and saying the unique name (which, by the way, isn't even that different apart from the "Scotland") must be some sick PR stunt. If you want to call her an idiot, talk about her wasteful spending.
And it doesn't even start with a K!
\v/