Kato Kaelin Denies Saying O.J. Simpson Murdered His Ex-Wife: Do You Think O.J. Did It?

by SodaHead Celebs Posted 2012/09/21 13:00:00

Related Topics: Kato Kaelin, O.J. Simpson

544 votes
Read all 252 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	457 votes	84%
	No	87 votes	16%

O.J. Simpson murdered his ex-wife Nicole Brown, or so Kato Kaelin reportedly told The New York Post. "The statute of limitations has now passed ... so I can now say ... yes, he did it," the Post quotes Kaelin, a witness in Simpson's infamous 1994-1995 murder trial, as saying. Kaelin also reportedly said that he was "too scared" to come forward with the truth during the trial.

BUT, Kato is telling TMZ he never said any such thing, explaining, "I would never say something like this" and adding, "I have no first-hand knowledge." Simpson was acquitted of murdering Brown and her friend Ronald Goldman. Kaelin was staying in a guest house on the Simpson property on the night Brown and Goldman were killed in 1994. All these years later, do you think O.J. did it?

+16

Add a comment above

MlssCue =Go Blue= 2012/09/21 16:33:31

Yes

+12
Do I breath? Yes!

Who smirks like this when the Mother of your children has been slain to death? It's ok, karma came back on him!
>> See Replies

More polls by SodaHead Celebs

Michael 2012/09/21 17:38:04

Yes

+5
There is no "statute of limitations" on murder, so first off that shows how kookie he is. But, yes, 104 different blood points of evidence convinced me!

reply
Rust 2012/09/21 17:35:56
american patriot 2012/09/21 17:22:08

Yes

+5
Absolutely! who else on this earth wanted those poor people dead. And murdered so savagely! This is one time the legal system flopped.

reply
Resp 2012/09/21 17:21:31

Yes

+5
I think O.J. got away with murder.

reply
Sherry 2012/09/21 17:13:47

Yes

+3
He didn't try to run because he was innocent. He either did it, or knew who did IMO.

reply
Ray the Dog! 2012/09/21 17:10:39

Yes

+3
From what I remember of the case I believe there was enough damning evidence against O.J. to suggest-to me,anyway-that he probably DID do it.
Personally,I think the most likely explanation for him getting 'away with it' was the fear that it would trigger race riots,especially since he was also a popular sports celebrity at the time...

reply
Luke 2012/09/21 16:55:46

Yes

+4
never had a doubt.

reply
Constant Commenter 2012/09/21 16:55:14

Yes

+4
And he has to live with it the rest of his life.

reply
Smokey 2012/09/21 16:54:45

Yes

+6
Of course he did it!

reply
Lerro DeHazel 2012/09/21 16:53:34

Yes

+2
You would be surprised how many Blacks believe that Kato Kaelin either did it, or was involved in a drug-deal that went sour, resulting in deaths; and for that reason, he knows who did it; but it was NOT O.J. . . . Btw, there is no Statute of Limitation on Murder in the State of California.

reply
kellendunk to Lerro D... 2012/09/21 17:13:06

+3
But OJs already been acquitted, they cannot bring the same charges agian anyway,

reply
Lerro D... to kellendunk 2012/09/21 17:49:21

I know . . . On some of these Murder Trial Court (Justice?) Fiasco's . . . Sometimes you feel like saying; "Then no one is dead?" The Prosicution has to be extremely cautious; especially in a high-profile case, to NOT make it appear as if the Defendant DID IT; but instead, there has to be proven that a victim (the deceased) lost his/her life, in the presence of the Defendant; and that IT IS POSSIBLE that the Defendant got a very close look at the Crime Scene immediately before, during, and just following the actual death of the victim . . . But whatever the Prosicutor does; DO NOT EVER SAY THAT THE DEFENDANT DID IT; or else the whole thing could be thrown-out, on some kind of Legality causing a mistrial.

reply
moiraregis 2012/09/21 16:48:43

Yes

+1
and not because of O.J.'s race; when i first heard of these grisly murders, it never crossed my mind to suspect O.J.; I actually felt sorry for him and the children; but once i saw that low-speed car chase, i changed my mind; the trial did not change it back; but the juice is behind bars now anyway--justice done, and all of it by O.J. himself--

reply
superangrymonkey 2012/09/21 16:45:54

Yes

+10
I think it's painfully obvious to anyone with a lick of sense that he did it. of course the thing got blown up into a racial issue when it was going on but honestly, he totally did it.

reply
Kitty to superan... 2012/09/21 17:41:47

+6
They always turn everything into a racial issue. The only reason Hussein Obama got elected too.........he was never elected because of his skills or experience. And now look at the mess.

reply
MlssCue =Go Blue= 2012/09/21 16:33:31

Yes

+12
Do I breath? Yes!

Who smirks like this when the Mother of your children has been slain to death? It's ok, karma came back on him!

reply
Kitty to MlssCue... 2012/09/21 17:52:40

+4
Not only a smirk but he actually looks a tad surprised that they didn't fit. Cochran is sitting there wondering if he had shrunk them enough from his tampering with them. It almost looks like he's trying to get two fingers into one glove finger. And you don't bend your hands while trying to pull on gloves. I'd have a hard time getting my own gloves to fit doing that. The defense should never have had free access to those gloves.

reply
MlssCue... to Kitty 2012/09/22 00:19:33

+2
EXACTLY! I will never forget him trying to put those stupid gloves on, of course they didn't fit! As if he's really going to put any effort into it anyway! grrr

reply
shadow76 to Kitty 2012/09/24 11:29:40

+1
Then the biased judge allowing him to cheat with the white gloves!

reply
Samanth... to MlssCue... 2012/09/21 20:57:46 (edited)

+1
They hung themselfs by have him try them on with the latex gloves on! Try to put on a leather glove with that glove and see what happens. The look on him face says hey people bend over I just got out of killing my ex THANKS!!!!!!

reply
MlssCue... to Samanth... 2012/09/22 00:20:25

Right! I still to this day wonder why was he freely doing this on his own, a bailiff could have very well done so! Oh that's right, this was a circus that's why!

reply
shadow76 to MlssCue... 2012/09/24 11:28:40

+1
More like butchered. but good point!

reply
Butch 2012/09/21 16:28:25

Yes

+2
I think Kaelin is a lying scumbag who was paid under the table to keep his mouth shut for the trial, and now has to stay silent for fear of being charged with perjury. There is no statute of limitations on murder. Seems to me that if a witness lied in court and it was proven so at a later date then said witness could be charged as some kind of accessory to said murder, therefore I would be surprised if there were a statute of limitations on any of the witness's testimony. It's only my ignorant opinion though.

reply
mikeeonly 2012/09/21 16:25:16

Yes

duh!

reply
BlackwinterG36C 2012/09/21 16:19:55

Yes

+3
DUH!! The evidence was overwhelming in that case. OJ only got off because of a hand picked biased/race card sequestered jury and crooked lawyer Johnny Cochran the guy that coud get ANY celeb out of jail.

reply
Kitty to Blackwi... 2012/09/21 17:45:04

+1
They're saying that Cochran tampered with the evidence as well. He did something to the gloves so they'd be too tight for O.J.'s hands.

reply
glass_butterfly ~YSU~ 2012/09/21 16:16:36

Yes

+2
The title originally didn't have "IF" in it.

reply
Stephen 2012/09/21 16:11:26

No

I think it was O.J.'s son.

reply
SuperCee 2012/09/21 16:11:18

Yes

+3
I have no busuness judging him but I always felt he had something to do with it but it's about what can be proven in court....he may have gotten away with murder but he has to answer to the heavenly father....

reply
Chris D 2012/09/21 15:55:18

Yes

+3
There is a 99.9% Chance that he did it.

reply
Christopher Kirchen 2012/09/21 15:50:43

Yes

+2
OF COURSE he did it! He should be on death row, or already have been executed.

reply
glen 2012/09/21 15:43:42

No

+2
the glove don't fit you must acquit !!!...........Really is he looking for a job or what !!!!

reply
moiraregis to glen 2012/09/21 16:53:01

+2
as a woman, i know what blood does to leather or fabric--it SHRINKS it, as anyone who has menstruated knows perfectly well, so that argument never convinced me; that said, johnnie cochran was just doing his job, which was to free his client; that the jury fell for this nonsense is what astonishes me--

reply
glen to moiraregis 2012/09/21 17:23:59

I know I was trying to pointing out that kato kaelin ( if that's his real name ) is looking for some camera time is all .

reply
Christo... to glen 2012/09/21 17:36:24

It isn't; Kato refers to the fact he was an "assistant" to OJ.

reply
smitty 2012/09/21 15:39:29

Yes

+3
Kato Kaelin

reply
Stevethinks 2012/09/21 15:37:06

Yes

As he said he has no first hand knowledge. So his guess is as good as yours or mine. But I guess yes he did. During the trial he was too scared to come forward with what truth, he has no evidence. He's looking to get money from someone, look out.

reply
Fran 2012/09/21 15:35:39

Yes

+2
Yes; O.J. did it and yes, Kato said it. I remember watching the Kato interview when he was asked and he said yes.

reply
J.MaisOui to Fran 2012/09/21 15:42:07

Me,too..he looked afraid...but it was so horrifying,who wouldnt?

reply
J.MaisOui 2012/09/21 15:33:19 (edited)

Yes

+1
Based on the actual evidence that was witheld from court. The prosecutors wrote books with a lot of detailed information. In the Casey Anthony trial they had no evidence,so made some up which was all proven to br fake. However,the media...namely Nancy Grace condemned her from day onr

reply