Quantcast

Katie Holmes Reportedly Sending Suri to Catholic School: Is It Better Than Scientology?

SodaHead Celebs 2012/07/16 15:00:00
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Call it another victory for Katie Holmes ... Suri Cruise will start school in September at Manhattan's Convent of the Sacred Heart, a fancy-shmancy private all-girls school in New York City, E! News reports.

suri

At the $38,000-a-year school, the previously home-schooled Suri will attend Catholic mass every Thursday. Past graduates of the elite school include Lady Gaga, Nicky Hilton and Caroline Kennedy.

Clearly, mama Katie Holmes, who reportedly got primary custody of the 6-year-old in the divorce, is calling the shots here. Papa Tom Cruise's religion, Scientology, seems to be completely off the menu. Holmes was raised Catholic, and so, in fact, was Cruise. Do you think the school is a good choice for Suri Cruise?
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Zoomie 2012/07/16 16:47:25
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    Zoomie
    +11
    Scientology is a cult, not a religion...

    So yes, Catholicism is definitely better. Better still, Catholicism (and I'm agnostic, raised Protestant) is a Christian faith which actually recognizes science (i.e. they accept evolution as factual science).

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • BigFig#9 2012/07/17 02:29:59
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    BigFig#9
    +1
    And I'm no Fan of any religion but at least you've got to respect tradition and the EXCELLENT STAGE SHOW that is Mass.
  • Leslie 2012/07/17 02:27:01
    No, Scientology is where it's at.
    Leslie
    +4
    I don't like either answer because I don't see either religion as better than the other. For 38 thousand a year I'd hope it'd be a good school for your kid.
  • ANGEL Leslie 2012/07/17 03:10:59
    ANGEL
    +2
    I appreciate your response, Leslie. The poll is based on a fallacy anyway - since there are no schools that teach the Scientology religion to 6 year olds, anyway! (LOL). It was obviously the intention of the person who created this poll to rig the poll because of their personal bias.
  • tncdel 2012/07/17 02:22:01
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    tncdel
    +3
    At least Catholic schools teach the basic reading, 'riting & 'rithmetic skills so lacking in most public schools.
  • TheBorg 2012/07/17 02:10:56
    No, Scientology is where it's at.
    TheBorg
    +3
    $38,000-a-year school? Wow, that is mighty Catholic of them.
    38000-a-year school wow catholic
  • ANGEL TheBorg 2012/07/17 03:12:41
    ANGEL
    +2
    Good point. You might find it interesting to know that this poll is based on a fallacy anyway - since there are no schools that teach the Scientology religion to 6 year olds, anyway! (LOL). It was obviously the intention of the person who created this poll to rig the poll because of their personal bias.

    Hypocrite - yes. Bigoted - certainly. But also: dumb
  • TheBorg ANGEL 2012/07/17 03:57:51 (edited)
  • reaper TheBorg 2012/07/20 05:51:08
    reaper
    lol, the scientolgist lied to you http://exscientologykids.com/... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    also at least with christians not all of them are jerks, scientologists on the other hand...

    scientolgist lied httpexscientologykids httpen wikipedia orgwiki christians jerks scientologists hand
  • reaper TheBorg 2012/07/20 05:47:42
    reaper
    you should hear how much scientology charges for courses, and how much to learn their beliefs.
  • chrystal97 2012/07/17 01:44:21
    No, Scientology is where it's at.
    chrystal97
    Either choice is bad. Why stand by a label that doesn't fit even 50 percent of its followers??
  • realist 2012/07/17 01:13:29
    No, Scientology is where it's at.
    realist
    they are both bs. ones just archaic.
  • Jalysa Ellis 2012/07/17 01:06:35
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    Jalysa Ellis
    Catholicism is alright. If it's like my parish- let's anyone in without discrimination- or a few others then it shouldn't be bad. Hope she pays attention better than I ever did. ^o^'
  • George Romney 2012/07/17 00:58:40 (edited)
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    George Romney
    +4
    Catholicism accepts that good deeds and actions ultimately get you into heaven (if there is such a place). Scientology holds that paying money gets you in spiritual good graces. There's a difference.
  • Kenneth... George ... 2012/07/17 07:10:12
    Kenneth Huang
    By good deeds and actions, do you mean slaughtering people by the cityload to satisfy a God with serious self-esteem and insecurity issues? (i.e. Book of Joshua and other parts of the Old Testament)
  • vinone 2012/07/17 00:44:34
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    vinone
    Scientology is a sci fi gathering...
  • Michelle vinone 2012/07/17 02:24:37
    Michelle
    +1
    Don't insult science fiction like that!
  • vinone Michelle 2012/07/17 02:46:44
    vinone
    L. Ron Hubbard was a science fiction writer, lol, but you make a good point, I should probably respect the genre a little more than that.
  • sharkhead 2012/07/17 00:44:11
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    sharkhead
    Anything's better than Scientology.
    I'm agnostic raised catholic and currently going to a catholic high school.
  • melissa 2012/07/17 00:43:25
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    melissa
    +1
    I GIVE Katie Holmes PROPS for standing up for what she believes is the best interest of herself and her daughter Suri. Katie is young and very independent I think this is the next chapter of her life and I wish her and daughter Suri nothing but the best. YOU ROCK :)
  • Merhabi Daham 2012/07/17 00:31:16
  • carlos c n 2012/07/17 00:30:46
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    carlos c n
    "The Bible calls people out on their wickedness. It takes God's light and shines it in the darkest places of our hearts, where we stash our pet sins, and declares us guilty of wrongdoing. It strips the veneer from sins that we have "redefined" or "renamed", preventing us from talking our way out of our moral perversity. Therefore, we as human beings have a motive for denying the truthfulness of the Bible, because if the Bible is true, then things do not look good for us."
  • MyPaperBleedsInk 2012/07/17 00:27:20
    No, Scientology is where it's at.
    MyPaperBleedsInk
    +1
    I wish there was a "they're both bad" option.
    Catholic can't be any better. Teaching children from the horrific bible? What kind of morals can they learn from a religion that oppresses people?
  • Michelle MyPaper... 2012/07/17 02:32:41
    Michelle
    As a non-Catholic speaking from 12 years of Catholic education, students don't just read the Bible during religion class: they're taught to interpret it. They carefully explain why we generally reject many of the horrific "teachings" in the old testament and generally teach what you can take out of the Bible, not the content itself. By high school level, 99% of the religion course is about the religion itself, not the Bible. Morality in Catholics is much better than the morality of many other Christian religions because Catholics are taught that there's good in all religions (in the Ontario Catholic system, there's a whole course on it that is needed to graduate)-- and Catholics (as a whole) accept scientific theory as fact, often reminding us that the Bible and science are not "at war" with each other like many seem to think. Yes, historically, Catholics have been a pretty oppressive bunch, but who hasn't at one point in time? You can't say that the American Constitution today is screwed up because it used to allow slavery. Today, the catechism of the Catholic Church specifically says the Church considers oppression of other religions to be wrong.
  • ANGEL MyPaper... 2012/07/17 13:39:22 (edited)
    ANGEL
    +3
    Soda Head management intentionally rigged the poll so that it would fall in favor of Catholicism. They obviously didn't want Atheists to have a voice and they also knew the majority of folks on SH were probably Catholic or Christian - and that the Scientologists were very, very few in number. Think about it - but providing only those 2 options - they were making Atheists choose in favor of Cathlicism! I think that is highly offensive and unethical for them to have created a poll so tainted.

    The other point is that to my knowledge - there are no schools that teach the Scientology religion to 6 year olds. There are schools that teach academics using the study methods that Hubbard came up with - but that has absolutely nothing to do with the religion. Therefore, the entire basis of the poll is a fallacy.
  • PDenoli 2012/07/17 00:09:47
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    PDenoli
    +1
    This question is certain to get the anti-Catholic trolls salivating for the opportunity to vote for Scientology and get some attention for themselves.

    Perhaps a better question might be: what *isn't* better than Scientology?
  • Chokmah 2012/07/17 00:04:10
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    Chokmah
    Catholicism is to Scientology as Judaism is to Papuan Cargo Cults.
  • RobHom 2012/07/16 23:58:10
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    RobHom
    Beats holding a couple of tin cans attached to string to see whassup in yo haid!!
  • Ev Rom 2012/07/16 23:50:39
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    Ev Rom
    +1
    Neither, she is going from one cult to another...
  • Chris 2012/07/16 23:43:37
    No, Scientology is where it's at.
    Chris
    +1
    They're both extremes.
  • trinity 2012/07/16 23:39:37
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    trinity
    +2
    catholicism is just better period
  • Michelle 2012/07/16 23:39:15
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    Michelle
    +2
    Did this question even need to be asked??
  • aibohphobia 2012/07/16 23:35:50
  • Jane 2012/07/16 23:29:21
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    Jane
    +1
    At least she will be able to walk away from it when she is old enough and smart enough to realize what religion really is.
  • The Sane One 2012/07/16 23:27:33
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    The Sane One
    +1
    Virtually any religion is better than Scientology, but they come pretty close when it comes to brainwashing of kids.

    It would be much better for Suri not to be inducted to ANY religion until she's old enough to be able to compare and contrast them herself as to which (if any) make the most sense to her.
  • Heisenberg 2012/07/16 23:23:30
    Yes, Catholicism is better.
    Heisenberg
    +1
    Definitely but even Scientology is better than being raised a Godless heathen.
  • Michelle Heisenberg 2012/07/17 02:35:17
    Michelle
    +3
    So being in a cult is better than being an atheist? Why is that?
  • Heisenberg Michelle 2012/07/17 08:44:58
    Heisenberg
    Don't have time to explain it to you.
  • tncdel Heisenberg 2012/07/17 16:53:27
    tncdel
    +1
    Although I respect your beliefs and will support your right to belief accordingly, I don't see it that way. Although Scientology attempts to substitute for mysticism, it is more an ideology.
    And mysticism is at odds with logic and reasoning.

    Religion evolved over the ages from primitive ignorance, as a way to explain what people didn't understand.

    But what sense does it make by asking a question, "Who created the Universe?" Then answering, "God created the Universe." Because then you must ask, "Well, then who created God." And the mystics cop out by saying, "No one created God, he just always was and always will be."

    [DUH!]

    Someone not afraid to question brainwashing activity, is not going to settle for such nonsense.

    Instead, they will see the obvious inference, in that, since it is a scientific fact that you cannot actually destroy matter, only change it's form [for example, if you burn a piece of paper, it isn't destroyed, it merely changes into gas, carbon, heat and light energy]. Therefore, if you trace the origin of the paper on back, to trees, then to a seed combined with soil, rain and sunlight, then you must keep on tracing back all the elements, and find NO beginning.

    Then common sense tells you it isn't any "god" that has always been and will always be, but MATTER that has...




































    Although I respect your beliefs and will support your right to belief accordingly, I don't see it that way. Although Scientology attempts to substitute for mysticism, it is more an ideology.
    And mysticism is at odds with logic and reasoning.

    Religion evolved over the ages from primitive ignorance, as a way to explain what people didn't understand.

    But what sense does it make by asking a question, "Who created the Universe?" Then answering, "God created the Universe." Because then you must ask, "Well, then who created God." And the mystics cop out by saying, "No one created God, he just always was and always will be."

    [DUH!]

    Someone not afraid to question brainwashing activity, is not going to settle for such nonsense.

    Instead, they will see the obvious inference, in that, since it is a scientific fact that you cannot actually destroy matter, only change it's form [for example, if you burn a piece of paper, it isn't destroyed, it merely changes into gas, carbon, heat and light energy]. Therefore, if you trace the origin of the paper on back, to trees, then to a seed combined with soil, rain and sunlight, then you must keep on tracing back all the elements, and find NO beginning.

    Then common sense tells you it isn't any "god" that has always been and will always be, but MATTER that has always been and will always be.

    Those who preach religion fall into three general categories:

    1.) The brainwashed who feel a need to recruit others to their beliefs, in order to obtain approval and emotional support for it.

    And

    2.) Those who make money off of religion.

    And

    3.) Those whose power is derived from religion [like in Arab countries, or the Pope, or Pat Robertson, etc., etc.]


    Religion is a BLIGHT UPON HUMANITY.

    Responsible for countless wars, deaths, rapes, other crimes and misery beyond imagining.

    Muslims fighting Christians, Muslims fighting Jews, Muslims fighting Hindus, Buddhists and other Muslims. Catholics against Protestants. Protestants against other Protestants. Etc., Etc. Etc.

    John Lennon had it right, when he wrote his song, "IMAGINE [there's no heaven ...]."

    Religion is also an instrument of oppression and subjugation. Particularly in Muslim countries, to keep women under control.

    How many people would have been "persecuted for their beliefs" if NO ONE HAD ANY MYSTICAL BELIEFS WHATSOEVER?

    How would people be towards each other if there was no animosity caused by "religious differences?"

    And what if people did good deeds simply BECAUSE IT WAS A GOOD AND RIGHT THING TO DO?...

    Instead of because they feared hell if they didn't, or they thought they would earn another "golden brick" in their "Mansion in the Sky?"

    I have more respect for people who do good for no more reason than because they enjoy doing it.

    Someone who believes religious mysticism has been HYPNOTIZED. Some hypnotized themselves without realizing it. Others were mesmerized by a slick-talking preacher. But most simply had it forced upon them when they were too young to realize what was going on.

    For mysticism to take hold, delusion and illusion must occur.
    (more)
  • L1 2012/07/16 23:16:17
    No, Scientology is where it's at.
    L1
    +3
    Actually neither one is, IMHO. I don't care for any organized religion....
  • january_girl 2012/07/16 23:05:41 (edited)
    No, Scientology is where it's at.
    january_girl
    +3
    neither of them are better than the other they are equal in my view. I am belive in a higher power but am not a part of any Organised religion I would call myself a spiritualist not a religious person.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Entertainment

2013/05/24 13:09:23

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals