Kate Middleton's Cousin Katrina Darling Does Playboy: Is She an Embarrassment to the Royal Family?

by SodaHead Celebs Posted 2012/08/16 16:25:54

Related Topics: Kate Middleton, Katrina Darling, Playboy

394 votes
Read all 187 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	111 votes	28%
	No	283 votes	72%

Kate Middleton has a cousin who's as pretty as she is -- and she's on the cover of Playboy. Katrina Darling wears black lingerie on the cover of the September issue, as you can see in this sexy shot:

Middleton and Darling are second cousins, once removed: Kate's great-grandfather and Katrina’s grandmother were brother and sister, "Extra" reports. But don't get too excited about the royal ties: Kate and Katrina have never met.

Darling, 22, will earn six figures for the cover and eight-page photo shoot, according to The Daily Mail. The banker-turned-burlesque dancer also raised some royal eyebrows when she performed her "God Save the Queen” act a London nightclub in honor of the Queen’s Jubilee, "Extra" reports. Do you think she's an embarrassment to the royal family? Or kinda ... hot?

+20

Add a comment above

Balladeer-PWCM-POTL 2012/08/16 17:38:04

No

+6
no more than THIS boob...

>> See Replies

More polls by SodaHead Celebs

jim 2012/08/17 05:26:18

No

+2
But Kate's still prettier.

reply
~[Rachel Mariee]~ 2012/08/17 05:13:48

No

Not at all

reply
Dickens 2012/08/17 04:59:54

No

+1
..I thought Camilla "Toilet" Bowles, otherwise known as "Best in Show" was the official "Royal Embarassment"

reply
Sybil 2012/08/17 04:27:28

No

Maybe in 1956. Luckily we have moved beyond that stuffy silliness. She's beautiful, she's young, and I see it as a celebration of that. Probably a nice fat pay-check too.

reply
Sybil to Sybil 2012/08/17 04:29:34

BTW, this is the country where the Sunshine girl was topless...I think this should fit right in!

reply
LunarRain 2012/08/17 03:29:02

No

Because she isn't blood related to the royal family.

reply
jai joshi to LunarRain 2012/08/17 12:04:22

and what if she has blood from a royal family??

reply
LunarRain to jai joshi 2012/08/17 18:42:21

Then maybe it's a little bit of an embarressment depending how you look at it. But she isn't so there is no need to think what if.

reply
jai joshi to LunarRain 2012/08/18 12:59:50

maybe if she has blood of royal family then she just ask for more dollars for this poster nothing else

reply
apachehellfire65 2012/08/17 03:02:02

No

+1
she is a distant cousin who did not even know she was related till after the marriage.

reply
mikewonaus 2012/08/17 02:07:03

Yes

Of course it is an em-bare-ass-ment! But we are okay wid it! After all, havin a horse fer a daughter-in-law iz kinda hard to top!

reply
I don't like Obama in office 2012/08/17 01:33:18 (edited)

No

I could care less..if she is or is not ,, The picture is teast fully done..She's beautiful ..

http://youtu.be/r_EMHo1_riY ..

reply
Medulla Oblongata 2012/08/17 01:19:14

No

I doubt anyone would know who she even is if it weren't for the caption next to her head.

She's beautiful, though. That family's got some good genes.

reply
Rob 2012/08/17 01:16:52

No

Kate Middleton will have plenty of chances to embarrss herself, so she worry too much about being outdone by a cousin.

reply
MIRANDDAAA :) 2012/08/17 01:09:54

No

+3
She's not really a member of the Royal Family, so it shouldn't matter.

reply
BlackwinterG36C 2012/08/17 00:36:07

No

Playboy is always a step up.

reply
bmxschoolbus 2012/08/17 00:17:51

No

she is not blood related to the royal family

reply
bmxscho... to bmxscho... 2012/08/17 00:25:21

+1
The Prince is probably masturbating to her nude pictures while Kate's not home.

reply
Rob to bmxscho... 2012/08/17 01:17:50

+1
LOL, yeah, let the scandles begin.

reply
Juanb to bmxscho... 2012/08/17 01:27:48

+1
shes way hotter than the other two i noticed they look like skinny hillbillies with ugly feet.yea hes gotta be unloading into paper towels

reply
frequent–antagonist 2012/08/17 00:09:20

No

She does not have relation to the Royal Family whatsoever. Kate was married in, not her family.

reply
imsmarter 2012/08/16 23:52:50

No

+3
She's not a member of the royal family.

reply
Sybil to imsmarter 2012/08/17 04:30:29

what is going on with those eyeballs????

reply
jacob crim 2012/08/16 23:48:30

No

+2
Who cares what cousins do.

reply
Tennessee3501 2012/08/16 23:35:39 (edited)

No

Queen Elizabeth herself should pose nude for Playboy! LOL!

reply
rereblue 2012/08/16 23:25:08

No

+2
They haven't even met, for one, and who really cares it's her life and it isn't like she is going to have any control. Who really cares?

reply
Torchy 2012/08/16 23:08:46 (edited)

No

+1
One, she's gorgeous; personally I'd rather be related to a Playboy centerfold than someone like, say, Amy Winehouse (and yes, I do know she's dead) -- someone who's destroying their lives. I am related to some like that and it's pretty awful. So she shows some skin, whoop-de-doo. Secondly, she's never even met them, she doesn't share the same last name (or she's using a stage name); how can you be embarrassed by someone you don't even know?

reply
Illjwamh 2012/08/16 22:37:50

No

+2
How is this even...? Gah??? It doesn't make any sense. @_@ She hardly qualifies as being "related" to the royal family, and the fact that she's never met them doesn't really add anything to the charge either.

reply
David (oYo) 2012/08/16 22:07:32

No

+1
I can't see why or how. One of our tabloid papers has got photos of Kate Middleton showing her knickers.

reply
frequen... to David (... 2012/08/17 00:13:45

Toronto Sun had one of Kate wearing no knickers at all.

reply
Sybil to frequen... 2012/08/17 04:31:34

Really?? I don't remember that!

reply
frequen... to Sybil 2012/08/17 14:40:23

Some people argue that she was wearing tiny microscopic underwear! Others say she was the first to test out "invisiundies". Better view in response below.

reply
David (... to frequen... 2012/08/17 08:30:15

That I must see lol. Princess Diana never did that to my knowledge.

reply
frequen... to David (... 2012/08/17 14:33:03

reply
Sybil to frequen... 2012/08/17 16:50:20

I would bet money she is wearing a thong. She has an awesome thong-worth body. What did they expect? Granny panties???

reply
frequen... to Sybil 2012/08/17 17:49:20

I'm quite sure by this angle it should be clear there is nothing there.

reply
David (... to frequen... 2012/08/17 22:17:01

So am I.

reply
David (... to frequen... 2012/08/17 22:16:33

Well for me she's not wearing any knickers. The way that dress opens up is deliberate is it and not the result of the wind.

reply
Sybil to David (... 2012/08/19 23:12:12

well, either way i still think she's a classy lady. i still like her.

reply
David (... to Sybil 2012/08/20 07:58:04

+1
I agree.

reply