Kate Middleton Now in 'Bottomless' Photo Scandal: Will It Damage Her Reputation?

by SodaHead Celebs Posted 2012/10/01 14:00:00

Related Topics: Kate Middleton, Bottomless, Photos

771 votes
Read all 285 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	130 votes	17%
	No	641 votes	83%

The Kate Middleton topless photo scandal is so last month. This month, it's all about her bottom. Danish gossip magazine Se og Hør told CNN that it did NOT publish bottomless photos of the Duchess of Cambridge changing her bathing suit. But somehow, the purported pics of the royal bride are out there.

E! News reported that the purported bottomless photos of Middleton, taken with a very long lens, show Prince William lathering lotion on his wife's back and rear as she pulls down her bikini. Like any nice husband would do.

Last month, French tabloid Closer published nude photos of Middleton sunbathing topless in France. Do you think the latest scandal will hurt Kate's rep even more? Are the paparazzi to blame for invading Kate's privacy? Or does Kate need to keep her clothes on in public?

+13

Add a comment above

imsmarter 2012/10/01 14:56:48

No

+25
They had a private moment... this doesn't tarnish HER reputation... It's the paparazzi who has no morals.
>> See Replies

More polls by SodaHead Celebs

Lena 2012/12/10 14:44:14

No

I suppose it might if they were shagging.

reply
Sidrah Zaheer 2012/11/11 23:21:13

Yes

She already has a damaged reputation.

reply
andrew 2012/10/19 02:08:06

No

no it wont

reply
Dydy 2012/10/08 04:24:40

No

It's not like she had then published, those photos weren't her idea. Ppl r over-reacting. It's her butt. I'm pretty sure we all have one, so get over it.

reply
Dave 007 2012/10/07 11:43:46

No

Where can I view these pics?

reply
Mutzi 2012/10/05 02:48:26

No

Don't be silly. On the other hand, a bottomless picture of Oprah, Kirstie Alley, or Val Kilmer...damage wouldn't even begin to describe it.

reply
lurch 2012/10/05 01:03:37

No

Leave it to predatory photographers to invade the privacy of ANYONE, all in an effort to score it big . . . . and at the expense of common decency.

reply
Wm Kabrich 2012/10/05 00:43:27

No

She is a very Beautiful woman. And what a husban and wife do on their time should be no ones buisness but their own. Paparazzi need to get real life and real jobs.

reply
PM 2012/10/04 13:49:12

No

+1
I suggest that all entertainers and famous people should ban together and start an Anti-Paparazzi magazine and have Paparazzi-Paparazzi (that's paparazzi who follow other paparazzi) follow them and snap deplorable shots of them and make up stories and publish them and the bosses of the magazines that publish the photos.

reply
sarah 2012/10/04 13:26:06

No

So what's the point? She's a human too.

reply
Tre 2012/10/04 11:45:02

No

Its not like she was streaking in the street for everyone to see. She was under the impression they were alone. What will damage her is if you fools in the media keep talking about it and making it a big deal.

reply
Catherine 2012/10/04 11:41:32

No

Topless didnt hurt much. Vag may be ok also

reply
John 2012/10/04 11:08:34

No

No, won't hurt her rep, like people said SHE did nothing wrong....

And probably won't hurt photographer's rep either, because everyone already knows they are scum sucking bottom feeders to do something like that.

reply
Bilingual required sucks 2012/10/04 10:57:40

No

+1
As long as Will is the only one tapping that, I doubt it.

reply
Epistemically Justified -- BN7 2012/10/04 05:43:15

No

+1
Unlikely.

From my perspective, it seems like her and her husband's privacy was invaded by the paparazzi. I don't think that she did anything wrong.

reply
Cricket 2012/10/04 04:08:18

No

She's done nothing wrong!

reply
kitsunejewel 2012/10/03 21:36:08

No

why is it any of anyone's business what she does in her private spare time? I find it disgusting that the paparazzi would invade Kate's personal space and take pictures of her changing in the first place.

reply
EdVenture 2012/10/03 17:12:55

No

Big deal, why is this a scandal? The photographer should be the scandal, no ethic.

reply
Brooke 2012/10/03 16:20:05

Yes

ooops pressed the wrong one many europeans go to the beach topless whats the prob

reply
KamalMadkour 2012/10/03 14:56:53

No

The Duchess is very beautiful, classy & well liked lady by many nations all over the world , she is A real R.H. wife to A real R.H. Prince , and her private & personal life is her own , The media should not at any level make that fuss over the Duchess . Please enough is enough. Kamal Madkour , uk Hotelier Group British National , resident presently in Cairo , Egypt .

reply
ivegotloveinmypants 2012/10/03 14:08:30

No

Shouldn't there be an I don't know option, Sodahead?! Poor Kate.

reply
sunniday 2012/10/03 13:33:00

Yes

It will hurt her,I do not believe she was ready for the microscope she married into,most seem to have an abnormal fascination with movie stars,politicians,royals,it comes with the territory,like it or not.I said yes not that it will hurt her reputation but it may hurt her as a person not used to the attention she is getting.Its funny because Princess Dianna had same problem.

reply
Bella 2012/10/03 13:13:38

No

Of course not. She was in the privacy of her home and those photographers invaded in their privacy. That is why I don't want to be famous because no matter what you do, someone will have something on you. If she was doing this in public I would understand but she was not.

reply
oldhouseMD 2012/10/03 12:36:20

Yes

The large amount of people who say "NO, it won't hurt Kate" are proof that they only want to exploit her by standing up for the people who are respondsibile for the photos. Kate has lost a certain amount of qualtity as a human that could have served the needs of many people. She is now damaged in that the people who perfer to see "her bottom" only need her for that reason. They are careless in their actions and opinions to undersand just how really bad this act is, they lack the capacity.

reply
seahawk665 2012/10/03 12:33:28

No

+1
The photographer is at fault here. This was clearly an invasion of privacy.

reply
James 2012/10/03 12:32:41

No

+1
She was having a private moment with her husband in a private setting. Leave it alone!

reply
das 2012/10/03 10:47:46

Yes

She is a whore like all healthy women in our world. Now people are surprised about it.

reply
Rdtourist to das 2012/10/03 19:11:03

So you are comparing the Duches with the welfare queens out there with 14 boyfriends, 6 kids and not a clue who daddy is?

reply
das to Rdtourist 2012/10/03 20:29:03

aren't all humans equal?

reply
Rdtourist to das 2012/10/10 13:08:39

You have a strange set of values, a woman hater by all indicators, "All healthy women are whores" sure seems to point in that direction.

reply
DANNY59 2012/10/03 10:42:07

No

+1
It sure shouldn't. People have to get over this body issue. You were either born a man or a woman, we all have bodies, and granted we don't all look exactly alike. But when it comes down to it were all human beings, so why should we be embarrassed about our bodies. Beside that, a woman has less to see with her bottoms off compared to a man. I always say, if a man can walk around without a shirt on, a woman should be able to go without the bottoms. Bodies our beautiful, and it's too bad they're mostly hidden.

reply
Theresa 2012/10/03 07:33:12

No

+1
Who cares!

reply
Cat 2012/10/03 06:26:23

Yes

+1
I think by now Kate has shown the world that she's ready to start hanging with Paris Hilton.

reply
mae 2012/10/03 06:14:49

No

Will and Kate have a right to expect privacy and took extensive precautions. It is the paparazzi who are taking this to extremes.

reply
MonaDeMark 2012/10/03 05:16:50
☆stillthe12c☆ 2012/10/03 04:58:08

No

I doubt it!

reply
santosh umap 2012/10/03 04:28:35

No

+1
She has a nice figure but now lives under the microscope

reply
nicesteve 2012/10/03 04:14:59 (edited)

No

+2
Let's hope not! I wish only the best for Kate and Will. And may the fleas of ten
thousand camals infest the armpits of that idiotic papparazzi. Kate is a good, decent, and
wholesome individual, like countless others who likes to shuck her kit every now and then
She deserves a lot more respect than she's reciving. And don't even wish any of it from
any of those bufoons with the papparazzi. They're only concerned about fattening their
bank accounts rather than earning an honest living like most of us.

reply
NotTargetMaterial 2012/10/03 01:53:44

No

You can't sink much lower than whore.

reply
Vintage... to NotTarg... 2012/10/03 02:08:32

+2
Huh??

reply