since when is a " dude " in the women's pagent ?
he wacked off his wienner and now claims to be a chick ?
how about wack off your bank account and claim to be rich ? LOL
a dude with out a penis is still a dude ,
Is the Miss universe pageant dead now that it is for transexuals?
RoyJLores
2012/04/07 23:32:53
|
|
|||||
|
16 votes
|
|
37% | |||
|
10 votes
|
|
23% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
5% | |||
|
11 votes
|
|
26% | |||
|
4 votes
|
|
9% | |||
Donald Trump has made the decision that the pageant is for transsexuals therefore naturally born women should have no reason to apply anymore, there were pageants for transsexuals before this happen and some still exist for naturally born women at least for now. So what do you think does this bring the Miss Universe to an end?
Read More: http://features.rr.com/article/00VyfeY7Ml0CA?q=Don...
Top Opinion
-
Patric 2012/04/09 11:06:53Yes I believe this brings the pageant to an end.






















people like to watch something that piques their interest.
In gender studies, cisgender (play /ˈsɪsdʒɛndər/) is a class of gender identities where an individual's gender identity matches the behavior or role considered appropriate for one's sex.[1] There are a number of derivatives of the term in use, including "cis male" for a male with a masculine gender identity, "cis female" for a female with a feminine gender identity, and "cissexual".
Kristen Schilt and Laurel Westbrook defined "cisgender" as a label for "individuals who have a match between the gender they were assigned at birth, their bodies, and their personal identity", complementing "transgender".[2] A similar adjective is "gender-normative"; Eli R. Green wrote, "The term 'cisgendered' is used [instead of the more popular 'gender normative'] to refer to people who do not identify with a gender diverse experience, without enforcing existence of a 'normative' gender expression
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
it's most commonly used by the LGBT crowd and the PC crowd which you belong too.
I'm not defending my point of view tooth and nail. This is fairly casual conversation, actually.
"Definition of POLITICALLY CORRECT
: conforming to a belief that language and practices which could offend political sensibilities (as in matters of sex or race) should be eliminated"
It would be much less offensive to not speak of such things at all. And yet we do, because until we actually become a country that treats all people equally, we will need to keep pushing for this.
According to Joani and you Heterosexuals don't have the right to sexual gratification of any kind that's something exclusively reserved for the LGBT crowd alone.
Your conspiracy theories are entertaining, though. Hope there is a tinfoil sale in your area!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
They also must not be married, pregnant, and have to fill out a more comprehensive form if they meet the basic requirements.
There is no mention of rules regarding sex-changes or cosmetic surgery."
Source: http://www.theprovince.com/ne...
No mention of it? No right to disqualify.
How is it equality to:
Not allow women over 27 to compete?
Not allow women that are married, pregnant and/or have children to compete?
Why should all the women be same height as it has been the case on previous MU contests?
If this was really about equality all those issues would have been raised but alas it is not it's all about publicity and political correctness.
Overhere up until an official ruling comes they do not intend to do away with how the pageant has been traditionally done.
The rules remain the same. I know that the organization is concerned about the situation, like us, because it is a sensitive situation. Gay and transgender community has supported us a lot, but this changes the game completely, "he said.
Lowry added that supports the LGBT community, but not in favor of transgender participation in the contest.
"In my personal character, I think that Miss Universe has a 61-year career with naturally born female participants and is part of a tradition, like the Boy Scouts is a tradition that only men are. Tradition, I understand, is what gives identity to the event and the organization,...
How is it equality to:
Not allow women over 27 to compete?
Not allow women that are married, pregnant and/or have children to compete?
Why should all the women be same height as it has been the case on previous MU contests?
If this was really about equality all those issues would have been raised but alas it is not it's all about publicity and political correctness.
Overhere up until an official ruling comes they do not intend to do away with how the pageant has been traditionally done.
The rules remain the same. I know that the organization is concerned about the situation, like us, because it is a sensitive situation. Gay and transgender community has supported us a lot, but this changes the game completely, "he said.
Lowry added that supports the LGBT community, but not in favor of transgender participation in the contest.
"In my personal character, I think that Miss Universe has a 61-year career with naturally born female participants and is part of a tradition, like the Boy Scouts is a tradition that only men are. Tradition, I understand, is what gives identity to the event and the organization, and understand that to be a change so drastically change the competition, "said Lowry.
For Deborah Carthy Deu, the second Puerto Rican to become Miss Universe, this decision is primarily a publicity Donald Trump to give attention to an event "that is down."
"I believe this is a strategy of Donald Trump, who finds it difficult to sell the event each year, and wants to make a profit while he is willing to whatever it is," said Miss Universe 1985, who disagree with the participation transsexuals in the contest.
"I do not feel well, not discriminating against transgender people, but I think it is unfair to the other girls because obviously these people will receive more publicity," he said.
Similar to Deborah Carthy Deu, said the expert in beauty pageants Hector Joaquin Colon for whom this decision is also filtered by advertising.
"I understand that advertising is a strategy building on the momentum no matter what happens next because you do not know," he reported.
Héctor Joaquín said that supports the LGBT community, but that "equality is one thing and the events is another."
"The question is whether they would stop in contests involving transsexual women. And talk about equality, then why not accept Miss Universe women over 30 years, married, divorced and single mothers, because if we talk about transgender equality, we must talk of equality to women, "he said
http://www.primerahora.com/%C...
http://voices.yahoo.com/moniq...
But more importantly what if any or all of those pageants tell you to STFU because what they do is their business alone and no one else's as opposed to MU's Donald Trump's catering to Special interests.
Why is it OK for certain races and groups to have something and not for others. Imagine if somebody made a "White" only pageant and you know what would happen it proves the tremendous hypocrisy of people like you.
What about participating Muslim countries do you honestly think they will go along with this because if you do you are insane.
http://www.glad.org/
Truth is this will turn off a lot of viewers on religious and moral grounds as well here and abroad, you might say "We don't need them" but guess what Christians and people of other faiths that would object to this do form the majority in this country and the world over. In the end this move will hurt the franchise were it hurts the most it's pockets.
That is off course when GLAD and the hardcore LGBT community will demand government intervention in the form of subsidies to save their newly acquired property. (property in the sense that they would not accept the franchise to fail if it comes to that as is a conquered frontier and symbol to them but off course as usual it will be easier to do it using other people's money)