Quantcast

Is Elton John a pedophile?

Curious E 2007/09/26 16:30:54
No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
Yes, anybody who enjoys owning naked pictures of young children (aside from their own kids) can be considered pedophiles.
He has the tendencies...owning naked pictures of children isn't natural.
Undecided
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Rocker says he's owner of seized photo

LONDON - Elton John said Wednesday that he owns a photo of two naked girls taken by award-winning photographer Nan Goldin that was seized by police at a British gallery over concerns it amounted to child pornography.

John confirmed ownership of "Klara and Edda Belly-Dancing" in a statement on his Web site. He said it is among 149 images comprising Goldin's "Thanksgiving" installation.

Northumbria police said the photo was taken from the BALTIC Center for Contemporary Art in Gateshead, northeastern England. They confirmed Tuesday that an image had been taken from an exhibit "to assess whether or not an offense had been committed."

Both Goldin and the gallery have declined to comment. The gallery alerted police to Goldin's photo on the eve of an exhibition featuring her work that opened Friday.

"The photograph exists as part of the installation as a whole and has been widely published and exhibited throughout the world," the 60-year-old rocker said.

"It can be found in the monograph of Ms. Goldin's works entitled `The Devil's Playground' (Phaidon, 2003), has been offered for sale at Sotheby's New York in 2002 and 2004, and has previously been exhibited in Houston, London, Madrid, New York, Portugal, Warsaw and Zurich without any objections of which we are aware."

John purchased the "Thanksgiving" installation in 1999, his statement said.

Goldin's frank and often sexually explicit work has drawn critical acclaim, as well as police attention.

In 2001, London police demanded that the Saatchi Gallery remove one of Goldin's photographs, saying it was indecent. The gallery refused, and officials later backed down, saying there was no realistic prospect of securing a conviction in the case.
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Smokey 2007/09/26 21:04:39
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    Smokey
    +3
    I don't know Elton John personally, but I think people get so worked up over nothing. If it's art then it's art. There's a huge difference from kiddie porn and art.

    Eric

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Spike123 2012/10/13 19:47:30
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    Spike123
    I thought he was into under age boys, not girls.
  • ɟʇʇoɔs 2009/09/22 22:45:54
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    ɟʇʇoɔs
    I don't think there is any evidence of him being a pedophile
  • Spike123 ɟʇʇoɔs 2012/10/13 19:48:36
    Spike123
    +1
    Give it time.
  • Icarus326 2009/09/22 19:13:28
    He has the tendencies...owning naked pictures of children isn't natural.
    Icarus326
    in my eyes hes not a pedophile until he makes a move
  • Spike123 Icarus326 2013/01/17 00:01:43
    Spike123
    The British establishment, won't arrest him yet because he is earning big bucks for the country, when he is bankrupt and not productive anymore the powers that be will arrest the old pedo!
  • Nate 2009/09/22 16:35:29
    Yes, anybody who enjoys owning naked pictures of young children (aside from t...
    Nate
    Look at the main pic, it answers this question itself.
  • debby 2009/09/21 17:35:11
    He has the tendencies...owning naked pictures of children isn't natural.
    debby
    that doesn't make him a pedophile per se but i do personally think he is lol
  • twin 2008/04/22 01:27:19
    He has the tendencies...owning naked pictures of children isn't natural.
    twin
    I was wondering if he have messed with young boys because he is known to like men.
  • I'm Left, You're Wrong 2008/02/24 13:10:44
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    I'm Left, You're Wrong
    No, but his priest probably is...
  • Maria 2008/02/04 06:35:23
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    Maria
    can't be right but he is gay.
  • babeygirl21 2008/02/01 03:40:19
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    babeygirl21
    he's gay..come on
  • marekgothgather 2008/01/15 04:56:09
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    marekgothgather
    so when any parent has a picture of their child naked on a fur rug in that classic pose everyone has had done, does that make them all pedophiles too?
  • reed 2007/11/26 11:49:06
    Undecided
    reed
    haven't u heard it's not a sin to look at what god created ?- the human body is beautiful!!!! come out of the cave and into the light!!!
  • NICKI70 2007/10/24 23:22:50
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    NICKI70
    I truly belive it is art maybe not everyone tast but to each there own.
  • patchesm27 2007/10/22 01:41:41
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    patchesm27
    I would not want a picture of naked children, but I have not seen this picture. I would like to see the picture to decide for sure. Parents take pictures of their kids naked in the bathtub are they pedophiles.
  • Curious E patchesm27 2007/10/22 06:42:56
    Curious E
    Yes, but I doubt they sell it for exhibition.
  • DELETED 2007/10/16 01:44:20
  • Angel41 2007/09/30 06:12:23
    Undecided
    Angel41
    +1
    I would have to see the picture, but I agree with Smokey's comment. If it's art it's art.
  • Smokey 2007/09/26 21:04:39
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    Smokey
    +3
    I don't know Elton John personally, but I think people get so worked up over nothing. If it's art then it's art. There's a huge difference from kiddie porn and art.

    Eric
  • La Saria 2007/09/26 19:15:57
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    La Saria
    +3
    Gimme a break. He's gay. He's not interested in little girls. Nan Goldin is famous. It's art.
  • highlatte La Saria 2007/09/28 05:33:13
    highlatte
    +1
    Give me a fu@#ing break. Dumb ass! Anybody, anybody, anybody. am I Clear?, looks at children with clothing removed, legs spread and tells us it is art...............Pervert. Does not matter what the sexual orientation

    Nan Godin is famous. So What? So is Hitler and Stalin. No accounting for taste and the ability to reason.

    Try talking to people who had their lives destroyed by the likes of your perverted mind.

  • Angel41 highlatte 2007/09/30 06:14:18
    Angel41
    I think you missed the point highlatte....or maybe you've seen the picture.
  • highlatte Angel41 2007/09/30 13:21:24
    highlatte
    +1
    What is the point?
  • La Saria highlatte 2007/10/01 17:19:06
    La Saria
    +1
    There really is a fine line between art and pornography. I don't have a perverted mind at all. I'm obviously against child pornography. But a photo that shows someone nude doesn't make it necessarily sexual.
  • highlatte La Saria 2007/10/02 13:46:42
    highlatte
    +1
    Well dear, most mental health care professionals, mediatiors, counselors and law enforcement officials that I have worked with would disagree. Most of my life I have been involved with victims of child abuse and the abusers. Also, I am a victim of child sexual abuse. You do not understand the correlation between enjoying a child's nude body and sexual perversion. One need not be a practicing pedophile either. As long as you and those like you choose to look at this issue with a liberal "it's all good" view " this society will see a continued increase in sexually based crimes against children.

    Hmm.... all the beautiful and interesting subjects to enjoy in the world , and some of you want to look at and defend taking pics of young children in the nude. Frankly I have grave concerns for the children within your families. And no it is not obvious that you are against child pornograghy, your are defending it.

  • La Saria highlatte 2007/10/03 21:25:05
    La Saria
    +4
    No. I am not "defending child pornography". I totally appreciate your concern for children and I sympathize with your abuse. As someone who was molested for 2 years by a family member, I can relate. But have you seen these pictures? I have not. So I can't say whether they're child pornography or not. But what I do know is that they were taken by a very respected artist and purchased by the very gay Elton John. I don't think a gay man would buy girl kiddie porn. I think that there is a difference between art and child exploitation. I havn't seen the pics (and dont plan on it) so I'm in no place to judge. I just hope you realize that not everything is so black and white.
  • twin La Saria 2008/04/22 01:41:52
    twin
    he might have brought it for his lesbian friends to enjoy, sorry it's not cute or art for children to be nude in a pic or how they are depicted in this type of picture
  • patchesm27 highlatte 2007/10/22 01:44:17
    patchesm27
    What about parents who take pictures of their kids in the bathtub.
  • Curious E patchesm27 2007/10/22 06:43:21
    Curious E
    I doubt they exhibit them for public consumption.
  • highlatte patchesm27 2007/10/22 12:25:36
    highlatte
    Very different from taking a naked child and posing them with their legs open.

    Have you seen the pics? I have. And no one, on one, will convince me that a healthy adult would want to view these type of renderings of children.

  • Hola 2007/09/26 18:07:48
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    Hola
    +1
    It is art. Art can be perceived differently to any one's eye.
  • Ginny 2007/09/26 18:02:56
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    Ginny
    +1
    He's controversial, she's controversial....seems natural to me he would be interested in her art. I would think they maybe even be friends. He has a gay lover husband/wife whatever who is much younger, but of legal age. Why do you ask if he's a pedophile?
  • Curious E Ginny 2007/09/26 20:33:51
    Curious E
    +1
    just to get a conversation going...
  • Ginny Curious E 2007/09/26 20:36:13
    Ginny
    Gosh! Silly of me, of course with your name as "Curious E's". I do not think he is a pedophile, but he is definately odd.
  • MaryAnachronism 2007/09/26 17:20:23
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    MaryAnachronism
    +1
    It's art. It's controversial. Everyone has a different opinion about it. He's not a pedophile.
  • The Hand of John 2007/09/26 17:13:49
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    The Hand of John
    +1
    I think, given his background, that girls are not his thing so I'm more inclined to think he was collecting art nudes. Besides there is a distinction between nudes and porn...although it can be a slippery slope.
  • ~Robin~ 2007/09/26 16:38:29
    No of course not, he just considers these photos as art.
    ~Robin~
    +2
    I think Elton likes boys not girls and in his mind I'm sure this is about art. The police didn't file charges against Goldin or the Gallery so why question if John is a pedophile?
  • Curious E 2007/09/26 16:31:52
    Undecided
    Curious E
    +1
    You just never know these days...

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Entertainment

2013/06/19 12:06:57

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals