Is Dakota Fanning Too Young to Be on Cover of Cosmopolitan?
☆WillThompson☆
2012/01/05 15:14:29
|
|
|||||
|
6 votes
|
|
25% | |||
|
16 votes
|
|
67% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
8% | |||
Read More: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2012/01/05/is...
Sort By
- bye im out sodahead 2012/01/06 10:03:33Undecidedwho cares i already answered this with a name like that she should call her self DEKOTA FANNY AND GO IN PLAYBOY don't worry about this bookreply
- Dave In Cali 2012/01/05 19:24:59NoA new born baby is old enough for Cosmo. It's not a porn rag - it's just salon literature. Stop wasting our time whining about young women who want to stop being seen as little girls. They are growing up. Deal with it.reply
- Sinister Ken Doll™ 2012/01/05 19:14:30Noif anything she's too awesome!reply
- Sprout 2012/01/05 18:43:40Noshe's adorable!!!reply
- 2226693 2012/01/05 17:06:45
- Hobbitt / Oldsquid 2012/01/05 17:00:11UndecidedNormally I would say that she is too young, However, Miss Fanning is not like MOST Hollywood stars at her age. She is a complete class act and has a good head on her shoulders. She has consistently made good decisions and I think she will continue to do so. I think this cover is a way for her to show the world that she is not the little girl that played in Dreamer anymore and is ready for more fulfilling roles and perhaps a leading lady part.reply
- overdog001 2012/01/05 16:02:45NoShe'll be 18 next month. How old do you have to be?reply
-
Yes+1My personal belief is that she is too young because I would not allow my daughters to read Cosmo, let alone be on the cover. However, I will not judge her because she is and has been in mainstream media most of her life and has yet to show poor judgement herself.reply
- Laura Lovegood 2012/01/05 15:20:29
















