Is Dakota Fanning Too Young to Be on Cover of Cosmopolitan?

by ☆WillThompson☆ Posted 2012/01/05 15:14:29

Related Topics: Dakota Fanning

Read More

24 votes
Read all 9 opinions
View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	6 votes	25%
	No	16 votes	67%
	Undecided	2 votes	8%

Add a comment above

bye im out sodahead 2012/01/06 10:03:33

Undecided

who cares i already answered this with a name like that she should call her self DEKOTA FANNY AND GO IN PLAYBOY don't worry about this book

reply
Dave In Cali 2012/01/05 19:24:59

No

A new born baby is old enough for Cosmo. It's not a porn rag - it's just salon literature. Stop wasting our time whining about young women who want to stop being seen as little girls. They are growing up. Deal with it.

reply
Sinister Ken Doll™ 2012/01/05 19:14:30

No

if anything she's too awesome!

reply
Sprout 2012/01/05 18:43:40

No

she's adorable!!!

reply
2226693 2012/01/05 17:06:45
Hobbitt / Oldsquid 2012/01/05 17:00:11

Undecided

Normally I would say that she is too young, However, Miss Fanning is not like MOST Hollywood stars at her age. She is a complete class act and has a good head on her shoulders. She has consistently made good decisions and I think she will continue to do so. I think this cover is a way for her to show the world that she is not the little girl that played in Dreamer anymore and is ready for more fulfilling roles and perhaps a leading lady part.

reply
overdog001 2012/01/05 16:02:45

No

She'll be 18 next month. How old do you have to be?

reply
☆WillThompson☆ 2012/01/05 15:24:40

Yes

+1
My personal belief is that she is too young because I would not allow my daughters to read Cosmo, let alone be on the cover. However, I will not judge her because she is and has been in mainstream media most of her life and has yet to show poor judgement herself.

reply
Laura Lovegood 2012/01/05 15:20:29