Does Joe Paterno’s Statue Need to Be Removed?
Chris D
2012/07/13 20:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
372 votes
|
|
67% | |||
|
182 votes
|
|
33% | |||
There has been new damaging evidence brought to light in the past few days that Joe Paterno covered up what he knew about child molester Jerry Sandusky in order not to tarnish the reputation of Penn State University and its sacred football program. It seems that Joe Paterno has tarnished his entire legacy, the football program and the university itself by not doing the right thing and turning Jerry in to authorities.
Bobby Bowden, the longtime Florida State football coach, and close friend of Joe Paterno says that the statue of Paterno on the Penn State campus should be removed. Do you agree with him?
SPORTS.YAHOO.COM reports:

Bobby Bowden, the longtime Florida State football coach, and close friend of Joe Paterno says that the statue of Paterno on the Penn State campus should be removed. Do you agree with him?
SPORTS.YAHOO.COM reports:
When news surfaced of Joe Paterno's connection with a child sex scandal at Penn State, former Florida State coach Bobby Bowden proclaimed that he only wanted to remember the good things about his friend of 50 years.

Read More: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/bo...
Top Opinion
-
Yes, take it down!+14All the records in the world won't give those boys their innocence back. We should not idolize people who don't protect children from preditors. When an athlete is found to be doping, they strip them of all their medals. This is no different.






















Depresses me at times to know I belong to the same species. I wonder if you can opt out into another one. Ah, there’s probably a long waiting list.
I think there is something else behind the 'hampering'. There must be a WILLINGNESS to disregard the priority of the welfare of children being sexually abused. It resembles the disregard shown by the people involved in the matter. There is a duty to report, especially by people in such positions of authority and trust over the children. Ben Zander is a good example. There are consequences.
Paterno knew of a real, current danger to children in allowing Sandusky to use university property. He knew Sandusky had raped children, yet he did nothing to stop him. That makes him an accomplice of sorts to what Sandusky did. If he had forbidden him access to the university and reported him to authorities, some of those children wouldn’t have been raped. That shows an unconscionable lack of morality. And what he did was a criminal offence: blatant child endangerment.
I don’t mean to diminish what Zander did, but I do want to make utterly clear the distinction between the two situations. I do not consider Zander to be completely lacking in moral character, as I d...
Paterno knew of a real, current danger to children in allowing Sandusky to use university property. He knew Sandusky had raped children, yet he did nothing to stop him. That makes him an accomplice of sorts to what Sandusky did. If he had forbidden him access to the university and reported him to authorities, some of those children wouldn’t have been raped. That shows an unconscionable lack of morality. And what he did was a criminal offence: blatant child endangerment.
I don’t mean to diminish what Zander did, but I do want to make utterly clear the distinction between the two situations. I do not consider Zander to be completely lacking in moral character, as I do Paterno. I do think he made a grievous error in judgement. His punishment was/is having lost a position he held and loved for 45 years. In my mind, that punishment is sufficient for his ‘crime’.
Let that sink in, $150 million. Penn State was second after Texas.
http://aol.sportingnews.com/n...
I am going to make another wild assumption, that you, even with below average intelligence, should have the people responsible for these incidents, and these continued incidences be held accountable. If someone was raping your son, I would trust that you would want him protected by the supervisors of the man doing the raping, not turning a blind eye to rapes in the coach's facilities, but I perhaps I have misread you, you would not mind your son being repeated raped on a university campus, because people felt the football program was more important than your son.
As to what Joe really knew, luckily he is dead, and idiots like you can suggest he was a ...
Let that sink in, $150 million. Penn State was second after Texas.
http://aol.sportingnews.com/n...
I am going to make another wild assumption, that you, even with below average intelligence, should have the people responsible for these incidents, and these continued incidences be held accountable. If someone was raping your son, I would trust that you would want him protected by the supervisors of the man doing the raping, not turning a blind eye to rapes in the coach's facilities, but I perhaps I have misread you, you would not mind your son being repeated raped on a university campus, because people felt the football program was more important than your son.
As to what Joe really knew, luckily he is dead, and idiots like you can suggest he was a great man, but in actuality, he was a poor leader and poor manager if these things were happening under his nose for 20 years.
You can play stupid, I suspect you are not as stupid as you sound, but you remind me of a teenager who says, I do not know, when asked how the window was broken, standing there with a baseball glove and bat and his friends bugging out of the back yard.
I hope that someday one of your family members isn't in a similar situation with people only thinking and saying the owrst when they don't know.
Enough said.
Go ahead and persecute his family for assuming the worst. You're a saint. Have you been reporting all of the pedophiles in your neighborhood? They are right across your street and you know they are, but you would rather dwell on a 72 year old man that wasn't told the entire story.
BTW, if he hadn't committed a crime, why are people saying that if he were alive today he would be brought up on charges?
Like I said before, IF he knew everything, he's rotting in hell.
Life is for the living, Joe is dead, you appear more concerned with his legacy than the boys that were raped on his watch, even when he said, He did not do enough. I agree with Joe. You can argue all you wish, but the facts, the testimony, the reports, eye witnesses, more victims emerging as the days pass, and common sense all point to the fact he was in possession of the facts, and he did nothing. Nothing. If you would do the same same thing, then you too will rot in hell. Goodbye.
Brilliant!!!