And even if there were no such signs in place at the Pittsburgh Zoo, it's common sense to not put your kids on the rails above wild animals in the first place. What is the zoo supposed to do, hold IQ checks on people entering?!
Do you think the zoo is to blame in this tragic case?
L.A. Times
2012/11/05 15:38:00
- 9,302 votes
- Read all 520 opinions
- Lightning Report + View Demographics
|
|
|||||
|
744 votes
|
|
8% | |||
|
8,558 votes
|
|
92% | |||
The 2-year-old Pennsylvania boy who died at the Pittsburgh Zoo over the weekend bounced two times on a protective netting after falling off a railing and into an African painted dog exhibit, where the dogs then attacked and killed him, the zoo's chief executive said Monday.
Read More: http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/nationnow/la-na...
Question Closed
Top Opinion
-
No
+17FŪC NO. Most zoos have signs in place warning against putting your kids on the rail, and I highly doubt the Pittsburgh Zoo is one of those zoos that doesn't.
And even if there were no such signs in place at the Pittsburgh Zoo, it's common sense to not put your kids on the rails above wild animals in the first place. What is the zoo supposed to do, hold IQ checks on people entering?!
no 2 year old would've been allowed up there on their own.
it's tragic yes but the zoo's fault? no!!!
but, that being said - i do send out all my love and sorrow for her serious loss... no mother should have to witness this let alone feel any sort of guilt for it being her fault.
But I do feel sorry for the kid though, and pray for the safety of any other kids she may have.
She would never see the light of day again for killing her child.
If a baby falls into the hyena pit, I'll be fighting some dogs.
Humans have big brains, but not all of us use them.
That's why God created people like me ;)