Christina Aguilera's Nude W Magazine Cover: Tasteful or Tacky?

A woman who is truly secure in her self and her body, doesn't need to show it off in any form of nudity!

She's Mona Lisa by today's standards!!!

The nudity is fine. You really don't see much, so it's not in bad taste. But why the hell is she trying to become Lady GaGa? Does she not see that everybody sees this?

Actually somewhere in between. Not exactly tasteful, but not deeply tacky either.

Well I think it looks to...white. Put a little more color in it.

But her hair has to go.....YUCK!!!

I think it's tastefully done...

I agree with Feisty, they had to have done A LOT of work, b/c she has WAY more curves then what the picture shows....

She's not nude on the cover.

She's not showing anything except for the curve of her butt.

Sorry, prudes...nothing there...

this lesbian woman looks better than shown on the title.of this mag, but hey do I care???

the cover look amazing :D

She is not exactly repulsive you know.

uggg..whats up with that hair though??!!

THESE STARS MAKE ME SICK THE THINGS THEY WANT DO FOR MONEY I WOULD STAY POOR THAN TO DO WHAT THEY DO THATS WHY THINGS ARE HAPPING NOW LOOK THESE BAD STORMS ALL STORMS BIG OR SMALL ALL OVER THE WORLD GOD SAID DONT LET ME CATCH YOU WITH YOUR WORK UNDONE

She's always the BEST!!!

Oooooooooo

She's not even that naked. She has a drape or something on her chest. No big deal.

Christina is the queen.................

... but what the hell is up with her hair??

exactly what I said...the hair is a mess

she's so beautiful and look how famous she is...she dosnet need a nude pic

While I don't really think it's tasteful, I know it's not tacky.

The new pinnacle? Between this, and pink haired attention whores doing vigilante video's, we now suffer (for their art), nude covers acknowledging (according to "them" whoever they are) this as the "standard fare".

I suppose I'm old school, but whatever happened to placing the likes of a Jaime Escalante on a cover?.......someone who pushed the downtrodden and disenfranchised to understanding and realizing their potential----that they HAVE all the tools to be equal if they will just work hard and be diligent!

Instead.....we wink and acknowledge this as the best hope and aspiration we can obtain and emulate......an Aguilera exclusive where she bares both her tits and her pain. Can we chant "self absorption class?"

I'll stop here lest I be accused of being a misogynist or void of any understanding concerning the new reality. Just please tell me which better manifests itself as that hope for a better tomorrow. I'd like to know.

It's nice, though it could use a little bit more improvement.

She's as covered as she can be for a sexy magazine shoot. I think it's tasteful. Only problem is that she's not really that skinny right now. I mean maybe that photo was taken before she packed on a few pounds idk. But on the voice she's not that skinny. Not fat either though. She also looks kinda sick in this picture. And the hair..uuuh yeaaa.

.... pic looks .. uumm .. well, maybe it gets an ' Okay ', but that's being generous.

Do ya' think she would pay cash for an autographed picture of me ... I don't come cheap ?

Her face isn't so good in that picture...

sexy!!!!!

more like disturbing

Not because of the nudity... because of the Aguilera-ness.

I picked tacky, but would have preferred the option "unattractive". Were they trying to make her look as homely as possible?

Its tasteful she is completely covered

I think this is badly phrased. It is tasteful, because she's being tasteful in the way she's covered up. But it's still tacky.

Ok leave the nude photo shoots to Playboy magazine please. This women is grown and is a mother she does NOT need to be showing her ass (literally) to the general public. I mean what if her son gets a hold of this when he's a teenager?

But a little too much Photoshop touch up.

"A little???"

Check the pics;

http://www.sodahead.com/fun/p...

Thanks for helping me make my point. The only reason I know better is the other night when we were in the sack, I noticed a little spare tire and some dimpeling in her thighs. Didn't throw her out of bed though, she's quite good.

De nada.

And what a vivid imagination you have...

*lolz