Angelina Jolie's Dad Says She Shouldn't Have More Children: Is Six Kids Too Many?

by The Big Question Posted 2012/04/25 21:27:47

Related Topics: Angelina Jolie, Dad, Angelina, Jolie

Read More

295 votes
Read all 133 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	164 votes	56%
	No	131 votes	44%

+11

Add a comment above

Meako 2012/04/25 23:34:40

No

+8
BUT THIS IS...

>> See Replies

More polls by The Big Question

Sir Bud 2012/04/25 23:32:38

No

+2
Jon Voight actualy said according to NYDailyNews.com:-Quote; "..."I love kids," the Oscar winner reportedly told Radar Online, adding that "six is quite a group, you know..".End Quote.Yet to find where he is supposed to have said that his daughter shouldn't have more children."Fox News"strikes again!?.

reply
aherbert to Sir Bud 2012/04/26 00:04:23

+4
Now that does not surprise me .....

reply
gregaj7 2012/04/25 23:32:19

No

+2
She can have all the children she and Brad can afford.

reply
Jon Peter 2012/04/25 23:31:39

No

+2
Will she beat octomom if she cheats?

reply
Dee4mee 2012/04/25 23:29:28

No

+3
Who the hell is anyone to tell someone how many kids they can have.... If you take care of them and love them and can afford it, it's nobody's business!!!!

reply
LisaSmith 2012/04/25 23:20:57

No

+3
She didn't have 6 children, she adopted children that were orphans, any child she adopts probably has a much better life then it would have if she didn't adopt them. If she wants to give birth to more children that is up to her, she has enough money to pay for them herself, she will never beg for money from big daddy government.

reply
Griegg 2012/04/25 23:15:56

No

+2
They can afford it.

reply
Jill 2012/04/25 23:11:32

Yes

+1
I don't think she should because she's seems like she's a fake and a nut.

reply
aherbert to Jill 2012/04/26 00:06:43

+3
Really.... just because you think that does not make it true.... she adopted several kids and giving them a life style that their biological parents couldn't. I think that is admirable.

reply
Jill to aherbert 2012/04/26 00:26:03

It is, however that doesn't mean that she is an awesome person or a person that should have those kids just because she could afford it. Don't get me wrong, I want kids to have the best situations they can, however, just because somebody wants to adopt doesn't automatically mean they are super parent.

reply
RoseyRhod to Jill 2012/04/26 00:14:26

+1
That's your opinion, which matters even less than Jon Voight's. Actually, she puts her money where her mouth is instead of just giving lip service to doing good works.

reply
Jill to RoseyRhod 2012/04/26 00:26:32

Enjoy your Angelina Jolie fest...your opinion doesn't really show good deeds. It shows lip service itself.

reply
KilrQueen 2012/04/25 23:06:24

No

+2
As long as she can take care of them and love them, then it's her business.

reply
SceneQueen❤Rose+Rachel❤ 2012/04/25 23:05:31

No

+1
its her choice

reply
Blackberry 2012/04/25 23:00:16

Yes

+1
It's selfish and unnecessary to have so many kids. People can fill their esteem holes by doing other things that don't impact the planet and society as much.

reply
Anna to Blackberry 2012/04/26 00:19:32

+3
3 of their children are adopted. Not seeing how that's selfish.

reply
Blackberry to Anna 2012/04/26 18:55:44

I stand corrected. I totally forgot about that.

reply
janet 2012/04/25 22:53:18

No

+2
It is really up to her and Brad : )

reply
Jack's Pearl 2012/04/25 22:51:34

No

+2
That is not for me to judge for someone else. Personally, way too many, but other like very big families.

reply
Brother Bo 2012/04/25 22:50:07

Yes

+3
She's only had one that I know of, she bought all the rest...

reply
Dee4mee to Brother Bo 2012/04/25 23:31:09

+2
She actually gave birth to 3......1 and then twins.

reply
Brother Bo to Dee4mee 2012/04/26 22:13:04

I didn't know about the twins...

reply
Meako to Brother Bo 2012/04/25 23:32:50

+2
She has given birth to three.

reply
Brother Bo to Meako 2012/04/26 22:12:34

I guess that just shows how much I follow Hollywood...

reply
tweet_tweet 2012/04/25 22:25:21

Yes

+2
This woman is so thin, I think it's fair to say that she is probably not healthy. I don't think she should have anymore.

reply
Jimmy Lucky 2012/04/25 22:23:29

Yes

+2
TOO MUCH TO HANDLE FOR A OLD MAN

reply
Bulanova (Team Hargitay) 2012/04/25 22:21:25

Yes

+3
It is for me and for me only. I cannot answer for anyone else.

reply
gunner 2012/04/25 22:16:07

No

+4
They are a blessing and if she wants more, so be it.

reply
Dima 2012/04/25 22:15:51

No

+2
they are not too many for a fortune holder
they would be many for a poor family
i think celebrities have to do such things instead of getting substances abusers , you know how they spend their money
so bravo Angleina keep going in adoption

reply
relic 2012/04/25 22:15:14

Yes

She needs to consider just how fast a hollywood celebrity can become an unknown has-been.

reply
Meako to relic 2012/04/25 23:33:20

+2
What?

reply
tobe to relic 2012/04/25 23:59:57

+1
shes been acting for god knows how long and so has brad pitt. their loaded. as long as they stick with acting theyll have jobs.

reply
Anna to tobe 2012/04/26 00:21:25

Even if they don't by now they probably have enough for several glamorous lives with 50 kids.

reply
MiinaNiemi03 2012/04/25 22:03:20

No

+3
Not for her, but for me it is.

reply
Lyssa Clark 2012/04/25 22:00:32 (edited)

No

+1
Hey she has the money...just wish she would take in some of our own U.S. babies who need homes. As long as she is giving them equal time and attention and not being raised by nanny's. Look at J-Lo..had twins then divorced and you never see them together..happens all the time in Tinsel Town.

reply
star 2012/04/25 21:50:43

Yes

+2
We know she can care and love 6 shes proven that over and over so i really think its up to her and brad if they want more.. myself i would stop i stoped at 3 thats as much as i could afford.. but hey they got it so i think they can do as they please!!!

reply
nico touched the butt 2012/04/25 21:50:32

Yes

+2
Ooh, well it depends on the circumstances. If the parents or parent can provide for the child in all aspects of their life than I think it's alright to have as many children.

reply
Medulla Oblongata 2012/04/25 21:46:59

No

+1
Nineteen kids, on the other hand...

reply
tobe 2012/04/25 21:45:49

No

+2
If you can take care of them and she seems to be doing quite well as a multi child parent. What I think is her daddys needs to learn when to keep his nose out of stuff that isnt his problem. I remember when he had a problem with her adopting her first child. Shes a big girl and shes got her own money and to me thats a big sign that says its none of his business. Ive got people like that in my family. Ones that tell everybody how to live.

reply
Bibliophilic 2012/04/25 21:44:59

Yes

Maybe she can afford to care for their needs, but there be time for their emotional needs as well? More than one sounds like a lot to me, but as long as they are adequately cared for it sounds okay to me.

reply